Assessing the impact of a leadership and advocacy elective course in a college of pharmacy curriculum.

INTRODUCTION AND LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK: While the scope of a pharmacist's work has grown, continued advocacy is needed to ensure that their skillset is used to the best advantage of the patient. To accomplish this aim, the University of Utah College of Pharmacy created an elective advocacy and leadership class to train students in leadership and advocacy methods, with a focus on enabling students to practice advocacy within the state of Utah throughout the class. EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT AND METHODS: In addition to traditional lectures, this class asked students to apply the knowledge learned in class to projects within their sphere of influence. Activities included drafting their own bill, writing to a legislator, attending state legislative and board of pharmacy meetings, and a longitudinal quality improvement project. Students answered a pre- and post-class survey to assess their attitudes towards advocacy efforts and how those attitudes were affected by participation in the class. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: As expected, a positive change in attitude towards advocacy was observed, and students indicated that they were more likely to engage in advocacy activities in the future after participating in the course. Moreover, a real legislative outcome has been observed as the result of class projects. IMPLICATIONS: Enabling students to engage in advocacy activities and guiding them to effect real change is a valuable technique in pharmacy education. Similar efforts can be replicated in other institutions, and similar training should be expanded to required portions of the pharmacy curriculum.

Implementation of radio-frequency identification technology to optimize medication inventory management in the intraoperative setting.

PURPOSE: Manual restocking and tracking of noncontrolled medications in anesthesia workstations (AWSs) is complicated and time intensive, provides several opportunities for error, and lacks perpetual inventory transparency regarding expiration and lot number. This pre-post study assessed the impact of radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology on restocking of noncontrolled medications in AWSs in relation to workflow, improved patient safety due to reduced restocking errors, and restocking accuracy and efficiency, as well as the estimated costs of on-site medication RFID tagging versus purchase of pretagged products. SUMMARY: Pre- and postimplementation process steps were mapped. Randomized AWS tray audits were conducted to assess patient safety, and AWS tray restocking efficiency was measured through stopwatch studies. Time and costs associated with purchase of manufacturer RFID tagged medications versus manually tagging medications on-site were estimated. Pre-post comparisons were completed using descriptive statistics. Prior to implementation, manual AWS restocking took a mean (SD) of 37.9 (24.7) seconds (range, 4.6-135.9 seconds), compared to 145.9 (50.6) seconds (range, 43.4-314.3 seconds) after implementation. The automated workflow took technicians an average of 108 seconds (1.8 minutes) longer than the baseline time. However, restocking errors were reduced by 64.7% and outdated and missing medications eliminated. Manually applying tags to packages containing 25 vials took a mean (SD) of 174.8 (19.8) seconds (range, 131-218 seconds) for smaller vials, compared to 128.1 (21.6) seconds (range, 102-166 seconds) for larger vials. Manual tag application was also more expensive than purchasing of pretagged vials. CONCLUSION: Automated RFID technology for AWS restocking decreased restocking errors but increased the length of time to complete the restocking process.