Is thoracic ultrasound a viable alternative to conventional imaging in the critical care setting?

Thoracic imaging is regularly performed on the majority of critical care patients. Conventionally, this uses a combination of plain radiography and computed tomography. There is growing enthusiasm for the use of ultrasound to replace much of this radiology and provide more immediate, point-of-care imaging with reduction in patient transfers, ionizing radiation exposure and cost. This article explores the diagnostic performance of thoracic ultrasound in the imaging of pleural effusion, consolidation, extra-vascular lung water (EVLW), and pneumothorax. Current evidence suggests that, in expert hands, thoracic ultrasonography has similar diagnostic accuracy to computed tomography in pleural effusion, consolidation and pneumothorax. The technique also has potential to identify the cause of increased EVLW and accurately quantify pleural effusions. More large-scale studies are required in these areas however. Ultrasonography outperforms bedside chest radiography in all cases.

"Why haven't you taken any pain killers?" A patient focused study of the walking wounded in an urban emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the proportion of patients of triage category 3-5 presenting to the minor side of an urban emergency department who present without taking prior pain relief, and (2) to describe the reasons why they do not take pain relief for their presenting complaint METHOD: By patient interview of a convenience sample of 60 adult patients in the setting of an urban emergency department. RESULTS: Fifteen of 60 patients had taken analgesia and 45 of 60 (75%) had not. Sixteen reasons were volunteered to the interviewer. Most patients offered one reason only 39 of 45 (87%). The three commonest single reasons cited for not taking pain relief were "don't like taking tablets" 10 (22%), "run out of tablets" 10 (22%), five (11%) said their "pain not bad enough". Six (13%) patients cited two reasons for not taking pain relief. Only three (6%) patients indicated that they "did not think about pain relief". Six (13%) of patients had inappropriate perceptions of how pain killers may interfere with their care. CONCLUSION: Most patients presenting with painful conditions to the minor side of an urban emergency department had not taken pain relief. The study highlights there are many different reasons for this and staff should not presume that it was because the patient "did not think about it". Ongoing education of staff and patients is needed.