A novel p53 mutant found in iatrogenic urothelial cancers is dysfunctional and can be rescued by a second-site global suppressor mutation.

Exposure to herbal remedies containing the carcinogen aristolochic acid (AA) has been widespread in some regions of the world. Rare A→T TP53 mutations were recently discovered in AA-associated urothelial cancers. The near absence of these mutations among all other sequenced human tumors suggests that they could be biologically silent. There are no cell banks with established lines derived from human tumors with which to explore the influence of the novel mutants on p53 function and cellular behavior. To investigate their impact, we generated isogenic mutant clones by integrase-mediated cassette exchange at the p53 locus of platform (null) murine embryonic fibroblasts and kidney epithelial cells. Common tumor mutants (R248W, R273C) were compared with the AA-associated mutants N131Y, R249W, and Q104L. Assays of cell proliferation, migration, growth in soft agar, apoptosis, senescence, and gene expression revealed contrasting outcomes on cellular behavior following introduction of N131Y or Q104L. The N131Y mutant demonstrated a phenotype akin to common tumor mutants, whereas Q104L clone behavior resembled that of cells with wild-type p53. Wild-type p53 responses were restored in double-mutant cells harboring N131Y and N239Y, a second-site rescue mutation, suggesting that pharmaceutical reactivation of p53 function in tumors expressing N131Y could have therapeutic benefit. N131Y is likely to contribute directly to tumor phenotype and is a promising candidate biomarker of AA exposure and disease. Rare mutations thus do not necessarily point to sites where amino acid exchanges are phenotypically neutral. Encounter with mutagenic insults targeting cryptic sites can reveal specific signature hotspots.

EB1 is required for spindle symmetry in mammalian mitosis.

Most information about the roles of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) and its binding partner EB1 in mitotic cells has come from siRNA studies. These suggest functions in chromosomal segregation and spindle positioning whose loss might contribute to tumourigenesis in cancers initiated by APC mutation. However, siRNA-based approaches have drawbacks associated with the time taken to achieve significant expression knockdown and the pleiotropic effects of EB1 and APC gene knockdown. Here we describe the effects of microinjecting APC- or EB1- specific monoclonal antibodies and a dominant-negative EB1 protein fragment into mammalian mitotic cells. The phenotypes observed were consistent with the roles proposed for EB1 and APC in chromosomal segregation in previous work. However, EB1 antibody injection also revealed two novel mitotic phenotypes, anaphase-specific cortical blebbing and asymmetric spindle pole movement. The daughters of microinjected cells displayed inequalities in microtubule content, with the greatest differences seen in the products of mitoses that showed the severest asymmetry in spindle pole movement. Daughters that inherited the least mobile pole contained the fewest microtubules, consistent with a role for EB1 in processes that promote equality of astral microtubule function at both poles in a spindle. We propose that these novel phenotypes represent APC-independent roles for EB1 in spindle pole function and the regulation of cortical contractility in the later stages of mitosis. Our work confirms that EB1 and APC have important mitotic roles, the loss of which could contribute to CIN in colorectal tumour cells.

Bladder tumour-derived somatic TSC1 missense mutations cause loss of function via distinct mechanisms.

More than 50% of transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder show loss of heterozygosity of a region spanning the TSC1 locus at 9q34 and mutations of TSC1 have been identified in 14.5% of tumours. These comprise nonsense mutations, splicing mutations, small deletions and missense mutations. Missense mutations are only rarely found in the germline in TSC disease. Therefore, we have examined six somatic missense mutations found in bladder cancer to determine whether these result in loss of function. We describe loss of function via distinct mechanisms. Five mutations caused mutually exclusive defects at mRNA and protein levels. Of these, two mutations caused pre-mRNA splicing errors that were predicted to result in premature protein truncation and three resulted in markedly reduced stability of exogenous TSC1 protein. Primary tumours with aberrant TSC1 pre-mRNA splicing were confirmed as negative for TSC1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression was also significantly reduced in a tumour with a TSC1 missense mutation resulting in diminished protein half-life. A single TSC1 missense mutation identified in a tumour with retained heterozygosity of the TSC1 region on chromosome 9 caused an apparently TSC2- and mTOR-independent localization defect of the mutant protein. We conclude that although TSC1 missense mutations do not play a major role in causation of TSC disease, they represent a significant proportion of somatic loss of function mutations in bladder cancer.

Examination of actin and microtubule dependent APC localisations in living mammalian cells.

BACKGROUND: The trafficking of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumour suppressor protein in mammalian cells is a perennially controversial topic. Immunostaining evidence for an actin-associated APC localisation at intercellular junctions has been previously presented, though live imaging of mammalian junctional APC has not been documented. RESULTS: Using live imaging of transfected COS-7 cells we observed intercellular junction-associated pools of GFP-APC in addition to previously documented microtubule-associated GFP-APC and a variety of minor localisations. Although both microtubule and junction-associated populations could co-exist within individual cells, they differed in their subcellular location, dynamic behaviour and sensitivity to cytoskeletal poisons. GFP-APC deletion mutant analysis indicated that a protein truncated immediately after the APC armadillo repeat domain retained the ability to localise to adhesive membranes in transfected cells. Supporting this, we also observed junctional APC immunostaining in cultures of human colorectal cancer cell line that express truncated forms of APC. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that APC can be found in two spatially separate populations at the cell periphery and these populations can co-exist in the same cell. The first localisation is highly dynamic and associated with microtubules near free edges and in cell vertices, while the second is comparatively static and is closely associated with actin at sites of cell-cell contact. Our imaging confirms that human GFP-APC possesses many of the localisations and behaviours previously seen by live imaging of Xenopus GFP-APC. However, we report the novel finding that GFP-APC puncta can remain associated with the ends of shrinking microtubules. Deletion analysis indicated that the N-terminal region of the APC protein mediated its junctional localisation, consistent with our observation that truncated APC proteins in colon cancer cell lines are still capable of localising to the cell cortex. This may have implications for the development of colorectal cancer.

Phenotypic changes associated with DYNACTIN-2 (DCTN2) over expression characterise SJSA-1 osteosarcoma cells.

DYNACTIN-2 (DCTN2) localises to chromosome 12q13-q15, a region prone to stable amplification in several cancers. Transient DCTN2 overexpression has a significant impact on cellular phenotype primarily due to disruption of the DYNEIN-dynactin motor. Changes reported include alterations of microtubule-directed movement of molecular (e.g. TP53) and organelle (e.g. Golgi) cargoes towards the nucleus, centrosome biology, cellular movement and mitosis with a potential predisposition to mitotic block and polyploidy. These changes would be expected to be of relevance to carcinogenesis. To investigate this, we report the first study of DCTN2 genomic amplification and sustained DCTN2 overexpression in cancer cells. QFMPCR was employed to characterise the extent of chromosome 12q13-q15 amplicons in SJSA-1, SJRH30, U373MG and CCF-STTG1 cancer cells. DCTN2 amplification was present in SJSA-1, U373MG and SJRH30 cells, yet was incomplete at the 5'-end in SJRH30 cells. Only SJSA-1 cells were characterised by DCTN2 overexpression on Western blot analyses. Microscopy studies distinguished SJSA-1 cells by greater DCTN2 immunofluorescence and diminished centrosome and 58K protein Golgi-marker focus compared to SJRH30 cells. Indirect evidence derived from the published work of others indicated that TP53 transport into the nucleus was unimpaired. Furthermore, we observed that SJSA-1 cells were easy to propagate. In conclusion, persistent DCTN2 overexpression can be tolerated in SJSA-1 cancer cells despite phenotypic abnormalities predicted from transient overexpression studies. This preliminary study does not support a major role for DCTN2 overexpression in carcinogenesis, although further studies would be necessary to confirm this.

Trapping of normal EB1 ligands in aggresomes formed by an EB1 deletion mutant.

BACKGROUND: EB1 is a microtubule tip-associated protein that interacts with the APC tumour suppressor protein and the p150glued subunit of dynactin. We previously reported that an EB1 deletion mutant that retains both of these interactions but does not directly associate with microtubules (EB1-DeltaN2-GFP) spontaneously formed perinuclear aggregates when expressed in COS-7 cells. RESULTS: In the present study live imaging indicated that EB1-DeltaN2-GFP aggregates underwent dynamic microtubule-dependent changes in morphology and appeared to be internally cohesive. EB1-DeltaN2-GFP aggregates were phase-dense structures that displayed microtubule-dependent accumulation around the centrosome, were immunoreactive for both the 20s subunit of the proteasome and ubiquitin, and induced the collapse of the vimentin cytoskeleton. Fractionation studies revealed that a proportion of EB1-DeltaN2-GFP was detergent-insoluble and ubiquitylated, indicating that EB1-DeltaN2-GFP aggregates are aggresomes. Immunostaining also revealed that APC and p150glued were present in EB1-DeltaN2-GFP aggregates, whereas EB3 was not. Furthermore, evidence for p150glued degradation was found in the insoluble fraction of EB1-DeltaN2-GFP transfected cultures. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that aggresomes can be internally cohesive and may not represent a simple "aggregate of aggregates" assembled around the centrosome. Our observations also indicate that a partially misfolded protein may retain the ability to interact with its normal physiological ligands, leading to their co-assembly into aggresomes. This supports the idea that the trapping and degradation of co-aggregated proteins might contribute to human pathologies characterised by aggresome formation.

Expression of BUB1 protein in gastric cancer correlates with the histological subtype, but not with DNA ploidy or microsatellite instability.

During mitosis, the spindle checkpoint delays the onset of anaphase until all chromosomes have attached properly to the mitotic spindle, preventing chromosome missegregation. BUB (budding uninhibited by benzimidazole) 1 is one of the key components of this checkpoint. BUB1 mutations are rare in cancer tissues and no mutations have been identified in gastric cancer. In mice, immunodepletion of BUB1 abolished the spindle checkpoint. Thus, aberrant expression of BUB1 protein could impair mitotic checkpoint function, resulting in aneuploidy, a common phenomenon in gastric cancer. In the present study, an antibody was generated against BUB1 and its expression was studied in gastric cancer tissue sections (n = 80) by immunohistochemistry. Nuclear BUB1 expression was found in all gastric cancer cases. The proportion of tumour cells expressing BUB1 was significantly greater in diffuse-type than in intestinal-type gastric carcinoma (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between BUB1 expression and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ploidy, microsatellite instability or any other histopathological parameters investigated. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study of BUB1 protein expression in gastric cancer tissues. Different BUB1 protein expression levels in intestinal- and diffuse-type gastric cancer may provide further evidence of a potential link between different genetic pathways and morphological phenotype in gastric carcinogenesis. However, further studies are needed to establish whether there is an association between BUB1 protein expression level and mitotic spindle checkpoint function in gastric cancer.