Development and Evaluation of a Community Advisory Board for Family Violence.

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important risk factor for child physical abuse, most IPV-exposed children are not evaluated for abusive injuries. A Community Advisory Board (CAB) was formed to (a) optimize a program to evaluate IPV-exposed children for abusive injuries and (b) inform research methods to engage IPV victims and their children. The objectives of this study were to implement and to evaluate the family violence CAB. Following best practices on CAB formation, we recruited local stakeholders with key roles as service providers, community leaders, and knowledge experts in IPV, child abuse, and emergency care. Fourteen members met bimonthly to develop a family-centered intervention and to inform research and advocacy activities. A shared memorandum of understanding outlined goals and objectives. One year after the CAB's implementation, a research assistant interviewed CAB members to understand their experiences, perceived benefits of participation, and desired improvements. Eleven CAB members, including an IPV survivor, participated. Emerging categories included (a) motivations to join the CAB (victim advocacy), (b) benefits of participation (development of relationships among members and increased acceptability of research methods), (c) facilitators of sustainability (program adaptability and development of trust), and (d) desired improvements (case-based follow-up). The CAB was successfully implemented and facilitated the development of collaborative relationships among stakeholders with key roles in IPV and child abuse. The CAB led to community member-proposed changes in research activities and clinical care for victims of IPV.

Disclosure Is an Essential Component of Ethical Practice: "I Am the Child Abuse Pediatrician".

This Viewpoint explains the role of child abuse pediatricians and makes specific recommendations for communicating their role in medical care.

Hospital Admissions for Abusive Head Trauma Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: Several studies have demonstrated a decrease in the occurrence of child abuse in the US since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding has generated concern for missed cases due to the initial lockdowns and lack of childcare resources. Determining the association of the pandemic on hospitalizations for severe forms of abuse is essential to focus preventive efforts. Objective: To examine trends in abusive head trauma (AHT) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, multicenter, repeated cross-sectional study, conducted January 1, 2016, through April 30, 2022, with data from tertiary care children's hospitals and contributors to the Pediatric Health Information System. Data were obtained for 2380 hospitalizations of children younger than 5 years with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for both abuse and head trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly hospitalizations were analyzed using interrupted time-series analysis. Hospitalization severity (eg, intensive care unit stay) and clinical characteristics (subdural hemorrhages and retinal hemorrhages) were compared before and after the start of the pandemic. Results: We identified 2380 hospitalizations due to AHT (median age, 140 [IQR, 75.0-325.5] days) from 45 hospitals. The mean (SD) monthly incidence of AHT was 34.3 (5.8) before the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 25.6 (4.2) during COVID-19 (a 25.4% decrease). When the pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 periods were compared, there were no significant differences in severity or clinical characteristics. On interrupted time-series analysis, there was a significant decrease in the number of monthly hospitalizations (-8.1; 95% CI, -12.41 to -3.72; P < .001) in the first month of the pandemic. In the subgroup of children younger than 1 year, there was a significant decrease in monthly hospitalizations at the onset of the pandemic (-8.2; 95% CI, -12.02 to -4.43; P < .001) followed by a significant temporal increase across the COVID-19 period (P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest there was a significant decrease in monthly hospitalizations for AHT following the start of the pandemic in March 2020. Although there was no corresponding increase in hospitalization severity, the decrease during the pandemic may have been transient, as monthly hospitalizations for children younger than 1 year increased significantly over time during COVID-19, after the initial decrease.

Using Child Abuse Specialists to Reduce Unnecessary Child Protective Services Reports and Investigations.

This Viewpoint informs clinicians of the potential harms of unnecessary reporting of child abuse and highlights the possibility of consulting a child abuse pediatrician prior to reporting in a subset of cases in which the concern for child abuse is low.

How Antiscience Creates Confusion About the Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma.

This Viewpoint exposes the antiscience and misinformation used to generate skepticism about abusive head trauma in young children, putting this vulnerable population at risk.

Frequency of injuries in a voluntary program evaluating young children exposed to intimate partner violence.

OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects 1 in 4 American women, and physical child abuse is reported to occur in 10-67 % of homes with IPV. Routine evaluation of physical abuse in IPV-exposed children is neither widespread nor informed by clinical guidelines. Thus, the true frequency of detectable injuries in IPV-exposed children remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of injuries in children <3-years-old reported for IPV to a regional child protective services (CPS) office. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we reviewed encounters of children whose caregivers agreed to an evaluation for injuries (physical exam and imaging, if indicated) from July 2019-June 2022. Children were included if: 1) a CPS investigator referred a child for evaluation for injuries ("non-acute" evaluation) or 2) a child presented immediately after an IPV incident ("acute" evaluation). RESULTS: Of 326 children <3-years-old reported to the CPS office after IPV exposure, 90 (27.6 %) were evaluated: 81(90 %) presented for a non-acute evaluation, and 21(23 %) were reported to have sustained trauma during the IPV event. Of the 90 children evaluated, 3 (3.3 %, 95 % CI 0.7-9.4) were found to have cutaneous injuries, fractures, and/or intracranial findings. Each was <6-months old and had an "acute" evaluation. CONCLUSION: In this study of children reported to CPS for IPV exposure, a small percentage was found to have injuries. A multi-center study that examines the frequency of and factors that increase the risk of abusive injuries in IPV-exposed children may ensure that testing targets children at highest risk.

Bruising in Infants: An Approach to the Recognition of Child Physical Abuse.

Infants (children <12 months of age) are maltreated at more than twice the rate of any other child age group, and infants die because of maltreatment at 3 times the rate of any other age group in childhood. The incidence of hospitalization for serious physical abuse in children also is highest for infants. Successful recognition of medically mild signs of physical abuse in infants, such as certain bruising patterns, can, therefore, lead to lifesaving interventions. The importance of the recognition of medically mild injuries due to physical abuse is underscored by the finding that a high percentage of infants (27.5%) hospitalized with serious physical abuse were found to have previously sustained milder injuries, such as bruising. Clinicians must be aware of patterns of bruising suggestive of abuse to distinguish between infants who have been abused and those who have been accidentally injured. To maximize the likelihood that abused infants will be identified and protected, as well to minimize the likelihood that an accidentally injured infant will be mischaracterized as abused, the application of an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of bruised infants should be applied. A consistent, evidence-based practice in this setting also may reduce the influence of racial and socioeconomic bias and decrease disparities in care.

Proxy Detection of Resident Burnout by Program Directors and Domestic Partners.

BACKGROUND: Resident burnout is associated with increased incidence of depression, suicide, and poor patient outcomes, yet identification of it is difficult. This study was designed to compare how well program directors (directors) and a resident's spouse or domestic partner (partner) can serve as a proxy to identify burnout in the resident. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic survey, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory, was distributed to residents, their partners, and directors of all ACGME-accredited residencies at a single university-affiliated hospital. Burnout rates were compared with McNemar's test. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization rates were compared with Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: The response rate by respondent type was 33% (292 of 876) for residents, 48% (55 of 114) for partners, and 57% (13 of 23) for directors. Residents' self-reported burnout rate was 51% (148 of 292), while partners' proxy predicted burnout rate was 25% (14 of 55), and directors' was 5% (9 of 174). There was moderate correlation of partners' prediction of resident emotional exhaustion (ρ = 0.537, p < 0.01), depersonalization (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.01), and personal accomplishment (ρ = 0.416, p < 0.01). There was poor correlation of directors' prediction of residents' emotional exhaustion (ρ = 0.361, p < 0.01) and depersonalization (ρ = 0.223, p < 0.01). Partners had a 50% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 86% positive predictive value, and 71% negative predictive value in predicting resident burnout. Directors had a 6% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 56% positive predictive value, and 54% negative predictive value in predicting resident burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Directors are not skilled in detecting burnout in their trainees. Partners are an underused group for detecting burnout and may represent an important target audience for awareness of available resources to benefit residents.

Effect of a Novel Mindfulness Curriculum on Burnout During Pediatric Internship: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Mindfulness curricula can improve physician burnout, but implementation during residency presents challenges. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a novel mindfulness curriculum implemented in the first 6 months of internship reduces burnout. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pragmatic, multicenter, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial of a mindfulness curriculum randomized 340 pediatric interns to the intervention or control arm within program pairs generated based on program size and region. Fifteen US pediatric training programs participated from June 14, 2017, to February 28, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention included 7 hour-long sessions of a monthly mindfulness curriculum (Mindfulness Intervention for New Interns) and a monthly mindfulness refresher implemented during internship. The active control arm included monthly 1-hour social lunches. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was emotional exhaustion (EE) as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory 9-question EE subscale (range, 7-63; higher scores correspond to greater perceived burnout). Secondary outcomes were depersonalization, personal accomplishment, and burnout. The study assessed mindfulness with the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and empathy with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index subscales of perspective taking and empathetic concern. Surveys were implemented at baseline, month 6, and month 15. RESULTS: Of the 365 interns invited to participate, 340 (93.2%; 255 [75.0%] female; 51 [15.0%] 30 years or older) completed surveys at baseline; 273 (74.8%) also participated at month 6 and 195 (53.4%) at month 15. Participants included 194 (57.1%) in the Mindfulness Intervention for New Interns and 146 (42.9%) in the control arm. Analyses were adjusted for baseline outcome measures. Both arms' EE scores were higher at 6 and 15 months than at baseline, but EE did not significantly differ by arm in multivariable analyses (6 months: 35.4 vs 32.4; adjusted difference, 3.03; 95% CI, -0.14 to 6.21; 15 months: 33.8 vs 32.9; adjusted difference, 1.42; 95% CI, -2.42 to 5.27). None of the 6 secondary outcomes significantly differed by arm at month 6 or month 15. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A novel mindfulness curriculum did not significantly affect EE, burnout, empathy, or mindfulness immediately or 9 months after curriculum implementation. These findings diverge from prior nonrandomized studies of mindfulness interventions, emphasizing the importance of rigorous study design and suggesting that additional study is needed to develop evidence-based methods to reduce trainee burnout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03148626.

Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Identify Injuries in Infants Associated With Abuse.

OBJECTIVES: Medically minor but clinically important findings associated with physical child abuse, such as bruises in pre-mobile infants, may be identified by frontline clinicians yet the association of these injuries with child abuse is often not recognized, potentially allowing the abuse to continue and even to escalate. An accurate natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify high-risk injuries in electronic health record notes could improve detection and awareness of abuse. The objectives were to: 1) develop an NLP algorithm that accurately identifies injuries in infants associated with abuse and 2) determine the accuracy of this algorithm. METHODS: An NLP algorithm was designed to identify ten specific injuries known to be associated with physical abuse in infants. Iterative cycles of review identified inaccurate triggers, and coding of the algorithm was adjusted. The optimized NLP algorithm was applied to emergency department (ED) providers' notes on 1344 consecutive sample of infants seen in 9 EDs over 3.5 months. Results were compared with review of the same notes conducted by a trained reviewer blind to the NLP results with discrepancies adjudicated by a child abuse expert. RESULTS: Among the 1344 encounters, 41 (3.1%) had one of the high-risk injuries. The NLP algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.0%-98.1%) and 98.1% (95% CI: 97.1%-98.7%), respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 60.3% and 99.8%, respectively, for identifying high-risk injuries. CONCLUSIONS: An NLP algorithm to identify infants with high-risk injuries in EDs has good accuracy and may be useful to aid clinicians in the identification of infants with injuries associated with child abuse.

The impact of a child abuse guideline on differences between pediatric and community emergency departments in the evaluation of injuries.

BACKGROUND: Although child physical abuse is missed more frequently in community (CEDs) vs. pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), little information exists describing how evaluations of high-risk injuries differ between these settings. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in evaluations of infants for abuse between a PED and CEDs and whether a child abuse guideline reduced these differences. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Infants presenting to one PED (n = 162) and three CEDs (n = 159) with 3 injury categories: 1) Injuries for which the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends skeletal survey (SS) testing (infants <5-months with an oral injury or bruising, <9-months with a non-skull fracture, and < 12-months with an intracranial hemorrhage); 2) an oral injury or high-risk bruising in older infants; and 3) multiple types of high-risk injuries. METHODS: We assessed differences in SS testing and child protective services (CPS) reporting between the PED and CEDs before and after implementation of a child abuse guideline. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age was 4 months (2-7). Before guideline implementation, infants with injuries in categories 1 and 2 had an increased odds of SS testing in the PED vs. the CEDs (Category 1: aOR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.01-8.10; Category 2: aOR 10.1, CI: 1.2-88.0) and CPS reporting (Category 1: aOR 7.96, CI: 2.3-26.7; Category 2: aOR 12.0, CI: 1.4-103.5). After guideline implementation, there were no statistically significant differences in testing and reporting for any injury category. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a child abuse guideline minimized differences between a PED and CEDs in the evaluation of infants with injuries concerning for abuse.

Characteristics and scope of humanitarian relief forensic medical evaluations for immigrant children in the US.

According to US Customs and Border Protection, over 473,000 family units and 76,000 unaccompanied children were apprehended in 2019, a multi-fold increase from previous years. Thus, the number of children who may be eligible for humanitarian relief has increased significantly. For those claiming humanitarian relief, forensic medical evaluations performed by health professionals can provide critical evidence to bolster claims. In this cross-sectional, nationwide survey-in which we sought to characterize specialties, forensic training, capacity, and scope of humanitarian relief evaluations for immigrant children under eighteen-years-old-only 28 providers, half of whom were Child Abuse Pediatricians, reported performing humanitarian relief evaluations. The most common reported type of humanitarian relief evaluation conducted was for asylum. We found that the current training for forensic medical evaluations for humanitarian relief in pediatrics is likely varied not well-defined, and not pediatric-specific. In order to protect the rights of children who are eligible for humanitarian relief, pediatric and family medicine forensic medical evaluation training standards and curricula need to be developed; validated humanitarian relief screening tools need to be tested and utilized; and residents and attending physicians, including specialists with expertise in forensic evaluations, need to be actively recruited to perform these evaluations in collaboration with legal aid organizations.