Surgical Site Infections in Posterior Lumbar Surgery: A Controlled-Cohort Study of Epidural Steroid Paste.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression between 2007 and 2013 was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of surgical site infection between matched cohorts of patients undergoing lumbar surgery with and without intraoperative application of epidural steroid pastes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidural steroid agents reduce postoperative pain and inflammation following lumbar surgery, reducing the use of postoperative narcotics and improving McGill pain scores. Preliminary studies have, however, suggested an increase in surgical site infections following the use of these steroid-containing pastes. METHODS: We reviewed 758 patients undergoing decompression performed at a single center by surgeons who either routinely used or never used an analgesic steroid paste. Patients undergoing instrumentation or revision surgery were excluded, and surgical and postoperative protocols were uniform. Two hundred eighty-three patients met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were assessed and correlated to the incidence of postoperative infections. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for confounding characteristics and identified independent predictors of postoperative surgical-site infections. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative protocols were similar between groups. There were six acute infections among 103 patients receiving steroid paste (5.83%), and two infections among 180 patients not receiving paste (1.11%), a statistically significant difference which remained after controlling for confounding characteristics (odds ratio 6.74, P = 0.01). All but one infection occurred among patients with identifiable preoperative risk factors for infection. CONCLUSION: The observed increase in infection among patients receiving pain paste is clinically significant, but infection was primarily observed among at-risk patients. The present study confirms suspicions raised in preliminary studies, and we recommend caution when treating patients with identifiable, comorbid risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion for Severe Deformity and Bone Loss.

Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion is an effective salvage procedure for combined end-stage ankle and subtalar arthrosis and for the management of severe planar deformities of the ankle and hindfoot. Although the procedure results in a rigid ankle and hindfoot, it is often the only means of providing patients with a stable and painless foot and ankle for ambulation. Some patients who require the procedure have substantial bone loss that can be managed with a variety of autograft and allograft options. Options for tibiotalocalcaneal fixation include both internal and external devices, the selection of which depends on the underlying pathology, amount of bone loss, and type of bone graft selected. Relatively high complication rates associated with tibiotalocalcaneal fusion have been reported, with complications ranging from superficial infection to ultimate amputation; however, proper patient selection and careful graft and fixation planning can minimize the postoperative complications of the procedure.

Synovial inflammation in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy: molecular characterization and relationship to symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic and degenerative meniscal tears have different anatomic features and different proposed etiologies, yet both are associated with the development or progression of osteoarthritis (OA). In established OA, synovitis is associated with pain and progression, but a relationship between synovitis and symptoms in isolated meniscal disease has not been reported. Accordingly, we sought to characterize synovial pathology in patients with traumatic meniscal injuries and determine the relationships between inflammation, meniscal and cartilage pathology, and symptoms. METHODS: Thirty-three patients without evidence of OA who were undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy for meniscal injuries were recruited. Pain and function were assessed preoperatively; meniscal and cartilage abnormalities were documented at the time of surgery. Inflammation in synovial biopsy specimens was scored, and associations between inflammation and clinical outcomes were determined. Microarray analysis of synovial tissue was performed, and gene expression patterns in patients with and those without inflammation were compared. RESULTS: Synovial inflammation was present in 43% of the patients and was associated with worse preoperative pain and function scores, independent of age, sex, or cartilage pathology. Microarray analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed a chemokine signature in synovial biopsy specimens with increased inflammation scores. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that in patients with traumatic meniscal injury undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without radiographic evidence of OA, synovial inflammation occurs frequently and is associated with increased pain and dysfunction. Synovia with increased inflammation scores exhibit a unique chemokine signature. Chemokines may contribute to the development of synovial inflammation in patients with meniscal pathology; they also represent potential therapeutic targets for reducing inflammatory symptoms.