Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Tedizolid Phosphate Compared to Linezolid for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Tedizolid and linezolid have antibacterial activity against the most important acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (ABSSSIs) pathogens. The objective of this work was to apply PK/PD analysis to evaluate the probability of attaining the pharmacodynamic target of these antimicrobials based on the susceptibility patterns of different clinical isolates causing ABSSSI. Pharmacokinetic and microbiological data were obtained from the literature. PK/PD breakpoints, the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. PTA and CFR are indicative of treatment success. PK/PD breakpoints of tedizolid and linezolid were 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Probability of treatment success of tedizolid was very high (>90%) for most staphylococci strains, including MRSA and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Only for methicillin- and linezolid-resistant S. aureus (MLRSA) and linezolid resistant (LR) CoNS strains was the CFR of tedizolid very low. Except for LR, daptomycin-non-susceptible (DNS), and vancomycin-resistant (VRE) E. faecium isolates, tedizolid also provided a high probability of treatment success for enterococci. The probability of treatment success of both antimicrobials for streptococci was always higher than 90%. In conclusion, for empiric treatment, PK/PD analysis has shown that tedizolid would be adequate for most staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci, even those LR whose linezolid resistance is mediated by the cfr gene.

Adverse reactions to antipsychotics in Parkinson disease: an analysis of the Spanish pharmacovigilance database.

PURPOSE: Although antipsychotics are well known for causing a plethora of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the main concern when used to treat psychosis in Parkinson disease (PD) has traditionally been motor function worsening. The limited number of patients included in clinical trials contributes to underreport less common ADR. The aims of this study were to describe ADR to antipsychotics occurring in patients with PD notified to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System and to contrast them with published reports. METHODS: All notifications from the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for the last 30 years (1984-2014) where an antipsychotic was considered suspicious of the ADR in patients who were also on dopaminergic therapy were reviewed. In addition, a systematic search of MEDLINE (1966-2014) was conducted with the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: "Parkinson disease" and "antipsychotic agents" or "psychotic disorders" and "drug-related side effects" or "adverse reactions." RESULTS: Forty-four notifications were selected for evaluation. Quetiapine was the most frequently implicated drug since 2002, and previously clozapine was the drug implied in higher number of notifications. The most severe ADR was neuroleptic malignant syndrome, which was described in 5 patients (3 cases related to quetiapine, one to haloperidol, and another to olanzapine). CONCLUSIONS: Some previously unreported ADRs caused by antipsychotic drugs in patients with PD have been described for the first time in this study, although there are in general well-known antipsychotic adverse effects. It is remarkable that some notifications involve the use of drugs not recommended in these patients.