Nonpharmacological Complementary Interventions for the Management of Pain after Third Molar Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Current Meta-Analyses.

Objectives: To provide a nonbiased, complete assessment of what the evidence from meta-analyses informs us about complementary and nonpharmacological treatment options for the management of pain after third molar surgery, as well as highlight any discordancy, gaps, or lack of evidence among meta-analyses. Methods: The quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed using the ROBIS tool. Corrected covered area (CCA) was calculated for pairs of similar meta-analyses to identify the amount of overlap. Reviews that were the most recent, comprehensive, and had adequate quality were considered for analyses when reviews showed a high overlap. In cases with a low amount of overlap among meta-analyses, all eligible studies were included. Also, citation matrices were constructed to address overlap. A network meta-analytical approach was adopted to rank different interventions. Results: Ten meta-analyses were included for quantitative synthesis. The quantitative analysis revealed that platelet-rich fibrin and its derivatives as well as ozone therapy reduce early and late pain better than the other complementary interventions compared to control (no complementary intervention). Conclusions: Despite the shortcomings of included meta-analyses, consolidated evidence suggests that platelet-rich-fibrin and its derivatives as well as ozone therapy outperform the other nonpharmacological complementary interventions in reducing early and late postsurgical pain following third molar extraction. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to an unclear risk of bias and lack of firm evidence in the included meta-analyses. Moreover, there is a need for a standard protocol for the application of nonpharmacological complementary interventions.

Residency Education in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A New Curriculum Framework.

Residency education in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) exists in an environment of transformation unlike anything seen in the past. Changes in American society accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic are impacting all of health-care education and demand a comprehensive response by OMS programs and in standards for education. The oral health in America report of the National Institutes of Health and actions of the American Council on Graduate Medical Education provides a new framework for structuring and adapting OMS programs. These include incorporating the Quadruple Aims and ACGME core competencies into OMS education. The evolution of clinical education is being adapted to changes in technology and the American higher education environment. A changing workforce and practice model combined with today's technology revolution are being incorporated into OMS residency education.

Education Solutions to the Medical-Dental Divide.

Arbitrarily cordoning off the mouth from the rest of the body is the educational approach that, since 1840, has been responsible for the medical-dental schism that persists today, preventing oral health's integration with overall health. This divide has also thwarted oral disease prevention initiatives, access to services, and health equity. This article offers an educational plan for reunifying medicine and dentistry, which involves interprofessional education, dual degree training, integrating oral health into medical education, and integrated residency training.

For preventive medicine to include oral health care, the dental profession, licensing agencies, payers, and the public must effect change.

Dentistry is represented to the US public in large part by the various professional associations, which speak for the interests of general and specialized dentists, mostly in private proprietary practice. Unfortunately, the interests of dental professional associations may often be in conflict with those of the public. To resolve this continued disparity, it behooves the dental leadership to become more involved with the overall health care system than continuing to enhance the economic interests of the profession without sufficient regard for the world-wide burden of unmet dental needs. An assessment of policy failures is provided with some recommendations for greater involvement of organized dentistry in the integration of oral and general health care. Dentistry must recommit itself to being a health profession rather focusing on the business aspects of health care. Another aspect to be considered is a reorganization of the American Dental Association to better represent the oral health care workforce.

Current Status of Postdoctoral and Graduate Programs in Dentistry.

Advanced dental education has evolved in the context of societal needs and economic trends to its current status. Graduate programs have positioned their role in the context of health systems and health science education trends in hospitals, interprofessional clinical care teams, and dental schools and oral health care systems. Graduate dental education has been a critical factor in developing teams in trauma care, craniofacial disorders, pediatric and adult medicine, and oncology. The misalignment of the mission of graduate dental programs and the demands of private practice has posed a challenge in the evolution of programs as educational programs have been directed towards tertiary and indigent care while the practice community focuses on largely healthy affluent patients for complex clinical interventions. Those seeking graduate dental education today are smaller in number and include more international dental graduates than in the past. Graduate dental education in general dentistry and in the nine recognized dental specialties now includes Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) recognition of training standards as part of its accreditation process and a CODA accreditation process for areas of clinical education not recognized as specialties by the American Dental Association. Current types of programs include fellowship training for students in recognized specialties. This article was written as part of the project "Advancing Dental Education in the 21st Century."

Preventing Wrong-Site Surgery in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

This article discusses the risk for wrong-site surgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery and the development and utility of checklists. The intent of checklists and the specific applicability of each of them to ambulatory oral and maxillofacial surgery are presented. Checklists and other considerations to mitigate the risk of wrong-site surgery are evaluated. The role of interprofessional teams in improving patient care outcomes with the checklist as a vehicle is evaluated. Recommendations for the use of checklists and related methods in the ambulatory oral and maxillofacial surgery setting are made.

Bisphosphonates and oral health: primer and an update for the practicing surgeon.

Oral and intravenous bisphosphonates have been in clinical use for two decades for the treatment of patients with malignancy, osteoporosis, and other diseases affecting bone metabolism. The purpose of this article is to review the features of these drugs, their effect on the diseases they treat, the oral findings associated with their use, and the assessment of osteonecrosis incidence, pathophysiology, with some insights into treatment.