Modeling policy development: examining national governance of stem cell-based embryo models.

Researchers can now coax human pluripotent stem cells to imitate the structure and spontaneous self-organization of the developing human embryo. Although these stem cell-based embryo models present an advantageous alternative to embryo research, they also raise ethical and policy challenges. In 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research revised its Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, providing contemporaneous best practices for ethical conduct in the field. The Guidelines complement national governance frameworks; however, they also contain contentious and aspirational norms that might catalyze change in research practice and in the enactment of national policies. Using a sample of 11 research-intensive countries, the authors compare research policy frameworks against the International Society for Stem Cell Research Guidelines to showcase how developments in global and national policies might affect stem cell-based embryo model research governance and illustrate fertile areas for ethical reflection and policy development.

Following scientific advances, researchers can induce stem cells to model the development of the human embryo with increasing accuracy. The International Society for Stem Cell Research Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation provide contemporary standards for research on so-called stem cell-based embryo models (SCB-EMs). However, because SCB-EMs are not mentioned in national policies and do not fit neatly into existing regulatory categories, it is unclear how countries intend to regulate them. In this article, the authors compare policy frameworks in 11 research-intensive countries to analyze how the influential Guidelines both complement and catalyze change in national policies. The Guidelines provide specific instructions for assessing and monitoring different kinds of SCB-EM research proposals, serving as a useful reference to bolster open-ended national policy requirements. However, in some areas the Guidelines appear to conflict with national policies governing stem cell and embryo research, reflecting divergent priorities and ethical assessments. Without policy review to address regulatory and ethical uncertainty, researchers may default to adherence to the Guidelines, a global standard that does not necessarily reflect local historic, legal and cultural influences. Evidence from France and Israel indicates that comprehensive legislative review is both useful and can proceed without eroding compromises designed to uphold plural beliefs regarding the moral status of the human embryo. As exemplified in countries such France and Israel, mandated legislative review processes are useful tools that can be deployed in manner that upholds pluralistic beliefs regarding the human embryo's moral status. They can serve as a pathway to re-engage the public and ensure diverse viewpoints are reflected in governance of SCB-EM research, ultimately facilitating public trust in science.

Roles and responsibilities in stem cell research: a focus group study with stem cell researchers and patients.

Background: The perspectives of researchers and patients regarding roles and responsibilities in stem cell research are rarely studied, but these could offer insights about responsible research conduct. Method: We have conducted a qualitative study consisting of focus groups with both early- (n = 7) and late-career stem cell researchers (n = 11) that are primarily based in Europe, and with Dutch patients with chronic lower back pain (n = 9). These focus groups have been analyzed thematically. Results: Four themes were identified: 1) roles and responsibilities in the laboratory, 2) responsibilities of and toward patients and the public, 3) the role of regulation and 4) structural hurdles for responsibility. Discussion: The results suggest that responsible research conduct could be improved by addressing grant application procedures, publication pressure and by providing support of dissemination activities for researchers. Conclusion: Responsibility in stem cell research could be enhanced by embracing open science initiatives and targeted training.

What researchers and patients think about roles and responsibilities in stem cell research is not well known, but this information could help to deal with the ethical aspects of stem cell research. We have conducted focus groups with early and late career stem cell researchers based in Europe and with Dutch patients. Four overarching themes were identified: 1) roles and responsibilities in the laboratory, 2) responsibilities of and toward patients and the public, 3) the role of regulation and 4) structural hurdles for responsibility. The results suggest that responsible research conduct could be improved by addressing grant application procedures, publication pressure and by providing support for communicating the progress and results of research. More generally, open science initiatives and targeted training could help to improve dealing with the ethical aspects of stem cell research.

Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope.

The ethical implications of stem cell research are often described in terms of risks, side effects, safety, and therapeutic value, which are examples of so-called hard impacts. Hard impacts are typically measurable and quantifiable. To understand the broader spectrum of ethical implications of stem cell research on science and society, it is equally important to recognize soft impacts. Soft impacts are the effects on behavior, experiences, actions, moral values, and social structures; these are often indirect effects of stem cell research. The combined notions of hard and soft impacts offer a broader way of thinking about the social and ethical implications of stem cell research and can help to steer stem cell research into a sociable desirable direction. Soft impacts enable researchers to become more aware of the broad range of significant implications involved in their work and deserve equal attention for understanding such ethical and societal effects of stem cell research.