Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 15(12): e51250, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38288225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability. Stroke survivors may have a wide variety of sensorimotor, cognitive, perceptual, and behavioral dysfunctions. The majority of long-term care for stroke survivors in residential settings is provided by informal caregivers, such as family members. This study was conducted to assess the burden of caregiving on caregivers of stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted by the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in a tertiary care institute in Western India. Patients were evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Caregiver strain among caregivers was assessed using the Modified Caregiver Strain Index Questionnaire (MCSI). The Katz index was used to assess activities of daily living. RESULTS: The inclusion and exclusion criteria were fulfilled by 125 primary caregivers of stroke patients. Among stroke survivors, the majority were male (57.6%), and caregivers were wives of stroke survivors (28.8%). There was a significant statistical difference in the median of the modified caregiver strain index when the stroke survivor was male (p=0.034), fully dependent (p<0.001), and had a hemorrhagic stroke (p<0.001). There was no significant statistical difference in the median of the MCSI based on the sex of caregivers (p=0.928). There was a positive correlation between the age of the patient and MCSI (r=0.373, p<0.001). No correlation was found between the MCSI and age of caregivers (r=-0.108, p=0.230) and duration of stroke (r=-0.089, p=0.321). CONCLUSION: The findings in our study provide evidence that caregivers of stroke survivors experience significant levels of strain. It is desirable to recognize caregiver strain during the rehabilitation of stroke survivors and manage it appropriately.

2.
Cureus ; 14(1): e21591, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35228949

RESUMO

Introduction Perineural corticosteroid injection is an extensively used and accepted treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, to this date, there is no guideline as to which corticosteroid has to be used as the standard treatment for CTS. Triamcinolone acetonide is a commonly used particulate steroid that can cause permanent nerve injury if it is accidentally injected into the nerve. Conversely, dexamethasone sodium phosphate is a nonparticulate steroid that would not cause permanent nerve damage following accidental injection. Methods Mild to moderate cases of CTS, confirmed by nerve conduction studies (NCS), with symptoms greater than three months were recruited. The participants received one session of ultrasound-guided perineural injection by the in-plane axial ulnar-sided approach with 4 mL of either dexamethasone (dexamethasone sodium phosphate 8 mg (2 mL) + 2 mL 0.5% bupivacaine) or triamcinolone (triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/mL (1 mL) + 2 mL 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mL normal saline) solution. The parameters assessed were Phalen's test time (in seconds), visual analog scale (VAS), and Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ) scores at baseline and two and four months, and NCS changes in sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and distal motor latency (DML) of the median nerve at baseline and four months. Statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Independent samples t-test was used for comparison between groups and the paired t-test for improvement within each group. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The mean age was 42.64 ± 10.99 in the dexamethasone and 45.22 ± 10.602 in the triamcinolone group cases (P = 0.324).There were 58 females (84.06%) and 11 males (15.94%). Each of Phalen's test time, VAS, and BCTQ scores significantly improved within both dexamethasone and triamcinolone groups at the second and fourth months after injection (P < 0.05). The NCS parameters (SNCV and DML) also significantly improved in both groups at the fourth month after the injection (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the improvement of Phalen's test time between the two groups (P = 0.745), VAS score (P = 0.319), BCTQ score (P = 0.137), SNCV (P = 0.511), or DML (P = 0.753). Postprocedural pain lasted significantly longer in the triamcinolone group (P < 0.05). No major complications were noted in either of the two groups. Conclusion Dexamethasone is as effective as triamcinolone in improving the symptoms of CTS and can be used as a safer and more effective alternative in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS cases.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...