A comparison of concentric and eccentric glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inferior scapular notching following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is due to mechanical impingement and, in some studies, has been associated with poorer functional scores, lower patient satisfaction, and more limited shoulder motion. We aimed to test the hypothesis that inferior positioning of the center of rotation with eccentric glenosphere designs decreases the adduction deficit before impingement occurs and improves clinical outcome. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial was performed. According to the results of a power analysis, fifty patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy were randomized intraoperatively to receive either a concentric or eccentric glenosphere. The glenoid baseplate was positioned flush to the inferior border of the glenoid before the glenosphere was then attached. Notching was assessed using an anteroposterior radiograph, and clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analog pain scale score, shoulder function rating, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Oxford shoulder score. Active forward elevation and external rotation were assessed. The outcome assessor was blinded to the treatment group. The mean follow-up period for the groups was forty-three and forty-seven months. RESULTS: Patient demographics and preoperative scores were similar between the groups. At the time of the final follow-up, four patients (14.8%) in the concentric group had developed inferior scapular notching (two with Nerot grade I and two with Nerot grade II), ranging in size from 1.1 to 7.4 mm, compared with one patient (4.3%; Nerot grade I) in the eccentric group (p = 0.36). No notching occurred in any patient with glenoid overhang of >3.5 mm. No significant difference between the groups was seen with respect to functional outcome scores, patient satisfaction, or shoulder motion. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in notching rates or clinical outcomes between concentric and eccentric glenospheres following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Inferior glenosphere overhang of >3.5 mm, however, prevented notching. This may be achieved with a modified surgical technique, but eccentric glenospheres provide an additional option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a relatively recent concept that provides further options in the management of cuff-deficient shoulder disorders. While early results utilizing the Delta III prosthesis (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) have been promising, there is limited data in the literature on outcomes utilizing differing prosthetic designs. We report on the outcomes of Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) utilizing a previously unreported prosthesis, the SMR Modular Shoulder System (Systema Multiplana Randelli, Lima-LTO, Italy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 49 arthroplasties in 48 patients who underwent Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with the SMR prosthesis were available for follow up. There were 10 males and 38 females with a mean age of 78.9 years (55-94) at time of operation. The most common indications were cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis with cuff deficiency (66%), followed by fracture and fracture sequelae (16%). RESULTS: At a mean 38 months follow up, 89% of patients rated their outcome as good or excellent. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score was 70.1 (range 3-100), and the mean Oxford Shoulder Score 22.0 (12-47). The mean active anterior elevation was 122 degrees (range 45-180) and the mean external rotation 14.7 degrees (25-75). Inferior glenoid notching was seen in 24% of patients. There was no radiological evidence of component loosening and no reoperations. CONCLUSION: Modern RSA designs give encouraging results in the treatment of cuff deficient shoulder conditions. Our early experience with the SMR RSA shows favourable outcomes and a low rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 Retrospective case series, no control group.

Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a treatment option for cuff tear arthropathy. Scapular notching remains a concern. This biomechanical study compared the range-of-motion in different designs of glenospheres and hence the relative risk of scapular notching. METHOD: A precision coordinate device was used to investigate four different designs of glenospheres (SMR prosthesis); 36 mm concentric (Standard), 36 mm eccentric, 44 mm concentric, and 44 mm eccentric glenospheres. The centre of rotation in each design was first established. The position of the humeral prosthesis was recorded in the plane of the scapula to compare the degree of adduction and the total range-of-motion. RESULTS: Eccentric glenospheres were found to improve range-of-motion by allowing a higher degree of adduction. Larger diameter glenospheres were found to improve range-of-motion by increasing adduction and abduction. Compared to the 36 mm concentric (standard) glenosphere, the 36 mm eccentric glenosphere improved adduction by 14.5 degrees, the 44 mm concentric glenosphere improved adduction by 11.6 degrees, the 44 mm eccentric glenosphere improved adduction by 17.7 degrees. CONCLUSION: Eccentric glenospheres with a center-of-rotation placed more inferiorly were shown to improve adduction. This design may reduce the clinical incidence of scapular notching.