Early revision rotator cuff repair: an analysis of outcomes and function.

PURPOSE: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly performed and can have good functional outcomes. However, failure of RCR surgery can be challenging for both patient and surgeon alike. This study examines the outcomes of early revision RCR for the management of clinically failed RCRs. METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing revision RCR within 1 year of primary surgery were evaluated. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were assessed at baseline, post-primary RCR, and post-revision RCR. RESULTS: Patients with a documented repair failure after primary RCR failed to improve in both ROM and PROMs compared to before primary RCR. Following early revision, RCR SANE (p = 0.024, p < 0.001), ASES (p = 0.004, p < 0.001), and SST (p < 0.001, p = 0.001) scores improved significantly compared to pre-primary and pre-revision scores, respectively. Documentation of a new traumatic injury did not affect clinical or functional outcomes compared to atraumatic re-tears. Number of tendons torn was positively correlated with higher SANE scores (r = 0.638, p = 0.008) and negatively correlated with SST score (r = -0.475, p = 0.03) and improvement in forward elevation (r = -0.368, p = 0.03) after primary RCR. There were significant correlations between number of tendons torn and improvement in SANE (r = 0.664, p = 0.007) and ASES scores (r = 0.468, p = 0.043) from post-primary RCR to post-revision RCR. CONCLUSION: Early revision after failed RCR can lead to clinically significant improvement in functional outcomes. The presence of a traumatic re-injury does not appear to affect revision RCR outcomes as it does in the primary setting. Patients with early clinical failures of primary RCR may benefit from early revision RCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III: Retrospective Case Series.

Surgical Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries in Polytrauma Patients.

The management of thoracolumbar spine injuries in patients with multiple traumatic injuries is a challenge complicated by multiple competing medical and surgical demands. Safe and effective treatment of polytrauma patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves surgical and critical care teams. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score, which was developed to facilitate consistent surgical decision making in patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury, provides objective criteria for the classification and management of thoracolumbar spine injuries. The AOSpine study group recently developed a comprehensive thoracolumbar injury classification system that was subsequently used to create the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score, which helps guide thoracolumbar spine injury management via objective criteria. These scoring systems have been effectively used in clinical practice and allow for a focused and objective assessment of thoracolumbar spine injuries. Both the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score and the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score should be routinely used in treatment decision making to optimize outcomes and avoid unnecessary surgical treatment in polytrauma patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury.