Transgastric biologic mesh delivery and abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Incisional abdominal wall hernias currently require repair with open or laparoscopic surgery, which is associated with wound complications and recurrent hernia formation. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques may have the potential to decrease the morbidity associated with hernia repair. The aim of this study was to repair a chronic ventral hernia with a biologic mesh placed transgastrically in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six pigs underwent creation of an incisional abdominal wall hernia. At least 4 weeks later, transgastric repair was done using an underlay biologic mesh with at least 5 cm of overlap from the hernia fascial edge. The mesh was secured with transfascial sutures and the stomach was closed with a sutured gastropexy. Pigs were evaluated 2 weeks later by laparoscopy. Pigs were sacrificed and necropsy wa s performed 4 weeks after the repair. RESULTS: Six pigs underwent hernia repair lasting a mean (+/- SD) of 204 +/- 123 minutes, with one perioperative death. At 2 weeks after hernia repair, laparoscopy showed significant adhesions in all pigs; one pig had extensive mesh infection and was sacrificed. Necropsy on one pig at 2 weeks and four pigs at 4 weeks showed complete coverage of the hernia defect in all pigs. All pigs had mesh abscesses or a positive mesh culture. CONCLUSION: Transgastric repair of a chronic ventral hernia is technically feasible. Difficulties with mesh delivery and infection need to be overcome before this approach can be used in humans.

Evaluation of a novel endoluminal stapling procedure to restrict the lower esophageal sphincter and reduce reflux.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: An effective, safe, and long-lasting endoluminal treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) would be an attractive prospect. We developed an endoluminal technique to restrict and tighten the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), by using a transoral endoscopic stapling device in a porcine model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-interventional evaluation comprised endoscopy, manometry, and 48-hour pH measurement of the distal esophagus using the catheterless BRAVO pH capsule. By placing the endoluminal stapling device at the LES and firing a 2.5-cm staple line, a vertical plication was created. In five pilot pigs (phase 1), plications were placed in various locations at the LES. In another five pigs (phase 2), plications were placed uniformly at the mid level of the LES on the lesser curvature side. Measurements were repeated 2 weeks after the procedure. Necropsy and histological analysis were performed. RESULTS: Endoluminal stapling was successfully completed in all animals. In phase 2, the median procedure time was 15 minutes (range 10-55 minutes). LES pressure increased from 10.5 mmHg (+/- 2.5 mmHg) to 14.3 mmHg (+/- 3.8 mmHg) (P = 0.038). Median percentage of time with pH below 4 decreased from 6.6% (range 2.9%-48.8%) to 2.2% (range 0%-10.4%) (P = 0.043). Histology showed the staple line involving the muscular layer in all pigs. A gap was present in the central part of the staple line in three pigs resulting in a mucosa-muscular bridge of tissue. This bridge did not influence the results. CONCLUSION: This novel endoluminal technique is feasible and safe in a porcine model over 2 weeks. It is appealing due to its simplicity and ease of application. Further studies aimed at eliminating the gap in the staple line and investigating more animals over longer survival periods are needed.

Endoscopic colotomy closure after full thickness excision: comparison of T fastener with multiclip applier.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Safe, reliable, and efficient endoscopic closure of a colotomy is paramount for endoscopic full thickness excision of the colon. Two newly developed devices, the Tissue Apposition System (TAS) and the InScope Multi-Clip Applier (IMCA), may help to achieve this. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using each device to close colotomies after full thickness wall excisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 pigs were used in the study. After laparoscopic full thickness excision of the colonic wall, the defect was closed using either the TAS or the IMCA. Closure was performed under laparoscopic vision. Success of colotomy closure, time taken for colotomy closure, postoperative infections, and complication rates were recorded. RESULTS: Complete closure was achieved in 6/6 pigs in the TAS group. In 5/6 pigs in the IMCA group closure was successful; in one pig laparoscopic assistance was used. Median closure time (range) was significantly lower in the TAS group at 48 minutes (15 - 51) vs. 76 minutes (43 - 145) in the IMCA group. There were no postoperative infections or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic closure after full thickness colonic wall excision is feasible with both the TAS and the IMCA. Closure times are significantly shorter and handling is easier with the TAS. Combined use of both systems might be beneficial.