Dual suppression with oral contraceptive pills in GnRH antagonist cycles for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with or without oral contraceptive pill (OCP) pretreatment, in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, 410 infertile patients with PCOS were assessed in their first ICSI cycles between January 2006 and June 2013. In Group A (n=208), patients underwent a long luteal GnRH agonist protocol, and in Groups B (n=143) and C (n=59), patients underwent a GnRH antagonist protocol. The patients in Group C also received OCPs containing 30mg of ethinyl oestradiol and 3mg of drospirenone prior to treatment. The main outcome measures were pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates. RESULTS: Demographic features, body mass index, duration of infertility, serum baseline hormone levels, cycle outcomes, multiple pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, OHSS rates, total number of Grade A embryos and total number of transferred embryos were comparable between the groups. Clinical pregnancy rates were 27.4%, 26.6% and 23.7% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p=0.853). CONCLUSIONS: OCP pretreatment was found to have no beneficial or adverse effects in patients with PCOS undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol for ICSI, but can be used for cycle scheduling.

Impact of unilateral tubal blockage diagnosed by hysterosalpingography on the success rate of treatment with controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rates of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in infertile women with unilateral proximal and distal tubal blockage. A total of 161 couples with unilateral tubal blockage and unexplained infertility were included. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR). The CPRs after three cycles of IUI were 26.3% (10/38) in patients with unilateral tubal blockage, and 44.7% (55/123) in patients with unexplained infertility (p = 0.043). CPRs were similar in patients with proximal unilateral tubal blockage and unexplained infertility (38.1% vs 44.7%, respectively, p = 0.572). CPR was significantly lower in patients with distal unilateral tubal blockage than in patients with unexplained infertility (11.7% vs 44.7%, respectively, p = 0.01). In conclusion, IVF instead of IUI may be a more appropriate approach for distal unilateral tubal blockage patients.

Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels correlate with ovarian response in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

PURPOSE: The role of serum AMH levels in prediction of ovarian response in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) was evaluated. MATERIAL METHOD(S): Twelve patients with IHH underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF were enrolled in this prospective study. Serum AMH levels were studied on the 2nd or 3rd day of an induced menstrual cycle by a preceding low-dose oral contraceptive pill treatment. A fixed dose (150-300 IU/day) of hMG was given in all COH cycles. Correlations between serum AMH levels, COH outcomes and embryological data were investigated. RESULTS: Mean serum AMH levels was 3.47 ± 2.15 ng/mL and mean serum peak estradiol was 2196 ± 1705 pg/mL. Mean number of follicles >14 mm, >17 mm on hCG day and MII oocytes were 4.14 ± 3.2, 4 ± 2.5 and 7.28 ± 3.5, respectively. Mean number of grade A embryos and transferred embryos were 3.28 ± 2.4 and 2.5 ± 0.7, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate per patient was 41.6 % (5/12). Positive correlations were observed between serum AMH levels and MII oocytes (r = 0.84), grade A embryos (r = 0.85), serum peak estradiol levels (r = 0.87), and number of follicles >14 mm (r = 0.83) and >17 mm (r = 0.81) on hCG day, respectively. CONCLUSION: AMH appears as a promising marker of ovarian response in patients with IHH undergoing IVF.

Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain.

We evaluated the effect of closure or non-closure of parietal and visceral peritoneum during caesarean section (CS) on post-caesarean pain and analgesic requirement. A total of 94 primigravidas planned for elective CS were prospectively enrolled into closure (n = 46) and non-closure (n = 48) groups. Analgesia was provided by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Total dose of analgesics administered through PCA and times of analgesia demand and additional analgesics were also assessed. VAS and VRS scores were similar between the groups. The total dose of analgesics administered were similar (p = 0.095) between groups, however the mean number of analgesic demand (p = 0.020) and the additional analgesics (p < 0.001) were higher in the closure group. As a conclusion, the closure or non-closure of the peritoneum does not have any impact on postoperative pain intensity, however the analgesia demand and additional analgesia requirement decreases with non-closure.

Outcomes after early or midfollicular phase LH supplementation in previous inadequate responders.

Second cycle outcomes of 75 patients who had previous inadequate ovarian response with recombinant FSH (rFSH)-only ovarian stimulation during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) down-regulated cycles were evaluated retrospectively. In these second cycles, both rFSH and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in GnRHa long down-regulation were given to all patients, HMG initiated either on day 1 (group A, n=37) or day 5-6 of the ovarian stimulation (group B, n=38). Total HMG dose was higher (1198+/-514 IU versus 726+/-469 IU; P<0.001), cumulative rFSH consumption was lower (1823+/-804 IU versus 2863+/-1393 IU; P=0.001) and duration of stimulation was shorter (8.94+/-1.15 days versus 10.37+/-1.80 days; P<0.001) in group A than in group B. No significant differences were found regarding fertilization, implantation or pregnancy rates and embryo quality between the groups. Further analysis by supplementary HMG dose (75 IU versus 150 IU) revealed that total gonadotrophin and HMG consumption was lower in 75 IU-supplemented subgroups. Notably, pregnancy rate was higher in patients where 75 IU HMG was supplemented on day 5-6 of ovarian stimulation, which deserves further evaluation.

Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves ovarian response and cycle outcome in poor responders.

The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on cycle outcome was assessed in patients with poor ovarian response. In total, 19 poor responder patients who were scheduled to undergo a second intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/embryo transfer cycle were enrolled and first ICSI/embryo transfer cycles were taken as the control group. All subjects were given DHEA supplementation (25 mg t.i.d.) for at least 3 months prior to their second ICSI/embryo transfer cycle. In both cycles a fixed dose of rFSH (300 IU/day) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) (75 or 150 IU/day) along with a flexible gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol were administered. A favourable decrease was noted in mean day 3 serum oestradiol concentrations after DHEA supplementation (75.14 +/- 28.93 versus 43.07 +/- 11.77; P < 0.01). Increased number of >17 mm follicles (3 +/- 0.7 versus 1.9 +/- 1.3; P < 0.05), MII oocytes (4 +/- 1.8 versus 2.1 +/- 1.8; P < 0.05), top quality day 2 (2.2 +/- 0.8 versus 1.3 +/- 1.1; P < 0.05) and day 3 embryos (1.9 +/- 0.8 versus 0.7 +/- 0.6; P < 0.05) were achieved in DHEA-supplemented cycles. Cycle cancellation rates were reduced (5.3% versus 42.1%; P < 0.01), and the pregnancy rate per patient and clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (47.4% versus 10.5%; P < 0.01 and 44.4% versus 0%; P < 0.01) were improved after DHEA supplementation. DHEA supplementation might enhance ovarian response, reduce cycle cancellation rates and increase embryo quality in poor responders.