RESUMO
Background: Glucocorticoids may grant a protective effect against postoperative complications. The evidence on their efficacy, however, has been inconclusive thus far. We investigated the effects of preoperatively administered glucocorticoids on the overall postoperative complication rate, and on liver function recovery in patients undergoing major liver surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL in October 2021, and repeated the search in April 2023. Pre-study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021284559). Studies investigating patients undergoing liver resections or transplantation who were administered glucocorticoids preoperatively and reported postoperative complications were eligible. Meta-analyses were performed using META and DMETAR packages in R with a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2. Results: The selection yielded 11 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 964 patients. Data from nine RCTs (n = 837) revealed a tendency toward a lower overall complication rate with glucocorticoid administration (odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.31, p = 0.23), but it was not statistically significant. Data pooled from seven RCTs showed a significant reduction in wound infections with glucocorticoid administration [odds ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.92 p = 0.02]. Due to limited data availability, meta-analysis of liver function recovery parameters was not possible. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of glucocorticoids did not significantly reduce the overall postoperative complication rate. Future clinical trials should investigate homogenous patient populations with a specific focus on postoperative liver recovery.
RESUMO
Critically ill patients are at risk of developing acute liver dysfunction as part of multiorgan failure sequelae. Clearing the blood from toxic liver-related metabolites and cytokines could prevent further organ damage. Despite the increasing use of hemoadsorption for this purpose, evidence of its efficacy is lacking. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence on clinical outcomes following hemoadsorption therapy. A systematic search conducted in six electronic databases (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022286213) yielded 30 eligible publications between 2011 and 2023, reporting the use of hemoadsorption for a total of 335 patients presenting with liver dysfunction related to acute critical illness. Of those, 26 are case presentations (n = 84), 3 are observational studies (n = 142), and 1 is a registry analysis (n = 109). Analysis of data from individual cases showed a significant reduction in levels of aspartate transaminase (p = 0.03) and vasopressor need (p = 0.03) and a tendency to lower levels of total bilirubin, alanine transaminase, C-reactive protein, and creatinine. Pooled data showed a significant reduction in total bilirubin (mean difference of -4.79 mg/dL (95% CI: -6.25; -3.33), p = 0.002). The use of hemoadsorption for critically ill patients with acute liver dysfunction or failure seems to be safe and yields a trend towards improved liver function after therapy, but more high-quality evidence is crucially needed.
