MRI overestimates articular cartilage thickness and volume compared to synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging.

Accurate evaluation of morphological changes in articular cartilage are necessary for early detection of osteoarthritis (OA). 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has highly sensitive contrast resolution and is widely used clinically to detect OA. However, synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging computed tomography (SR-PCI) can also provide contrast to tissue interfaces that do not have sufficient absorption differences, with the added benefit of very high spatial resolution. Here, MRI was compared with SR-PCI for quantitative evaluation of human articular cartilage. Medial tibial condyles were harvested from non-OA donors and from OA patients receiving knee replacement surgery. Both imaging methods revealed that average cartilage thickness and cartilage volume were significantly reduced in the OA group, compared to the non-OA group. When comparing modalities, the superior resolution of SR-PCI enabled more precise mapping of the cartilage surface relative to MRI. As a result, MRI showed significantly higher average cartilage thickness and cartilage volume, compared to SR-PCI. These data highlight the potential for high-resolution imaging of articular cartilage using SR-PCI as a solution for early OA diagnosis. Recognizing current limitations of using a synchrotron for clinical imaging, we discuss its nascent utility for preclinical models, particularly longitudinal studies of live animal models of OA.

Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids.

Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with "reduced bone," which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro-CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of "reduced bone": bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non-icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non-icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, "reduced bone" in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that "reduced bone" in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non-icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony.

Mineralized Cartilage and Bone-Like Tissues in Chondrichthyans Offer Potential Insights Into the Evolution and Development of Mineralized Tissues in the Vertebrate Endoskeleton.

The impregnation of biominerals into the extracellular matrix of living organisms, a process termed biomineralization, gives rise to diverse mineralized (or calcified) tissues in vertebrates. Preservation of mineralized tissues in the fossil record has provided insights into the evolutionary history of vertebrates and their skeletons. However, current understanding of the vertebrate skeleton and of the processes underlying its formation is biased towards biomedical models such as the tetrapods mouse and chick. Chondrichthyans (sharks, skates, rays, and chimaeras) and osteichthyans are the only vertebrate groups with extant (living) representatives that have a mineralized skeleton, but the basal phylogenetic position of chondrichthyans could potentially offer unique insights into skeletal evolution. For example, bone is a vertebrate novelty, but the internal supporting skeleton (endoskeleton) of extant chondrichthyans is commonly described as lacking bone. The molecular and developmental basis for this assertion is yet to be tested. Subperichondral tissues in the endoskeleton of some chondrichthyans display mineralization patterns and histological and molecular features of bone, thereby challenging the notion that extant chondrichthyans lack endoskeletal bone. Additionally, the chondrichthyan endoskeleton demonstrates some unique features and others that are potentially homologous with other vertebrates, including a polygonal mineralization pattern, a trabecular mineralization pattern, and an unconstricted perichordal sheath. Because of the basal phylogenetic position of chondrichthyans among all other extant vertebrates with a mineralized skeleton, developmental and molecular studies of chondrichthyans are critical to flesh out the evolution of vertebrate skeletal tissues, but only a handful of such studies have been carried out to date. This review discusses morphological and molecular features of chondrichthyan endoskeletal tissues and cell types, ultimately emphasizing how comparative embryology and transcriptomics can reveal homology of mineralized skeletal tissues (and their cell types) between chondrichthyans and other vertebrates.

Bone-like features in skate suggest a novel elasmobranch synapomorphy and deep homology of trabecular mineralization patterns.

Bone is a defining characteristic of the vertebrate skeleton, and while chondrichthyans (sharks, skates, and other cartilaginous fishes) are vertebrates, they are hypothesized to have lost the ability to make bone during their evolution. Multiple descriptions of a bone-like tissue in neural arches of vertebrae in various shark species (selachians), however, challenge this hypothesis. Here, we extend this argument by analyzing vertebrae of two members of the batoids (the little skate Leucoraja erinacea and Eaton's skate Bathyraja eatonii), the sister group to selachians within elasmobranchs. Micro-CT images showed a bone-like mineralization pattern in neural arches of each skate species, and histological analyses confirmed that this bone-like tissue surrounded a cartilage core, exactly as described in sharks. Another mineralization pattern identified in skate vertebrae was distinct from the polygonal tesseral and areolar patterns that classically are associated with the chondrichthyan endoskeleton. Many regions of the vertebrae, including the neural spine and transverse processes, showed this perichondral mineralization pattern, termed here trabecular tesseral. Other than the cartilage core of the neural arch, all mineralized tissues in skate vertebrae had flattened cells surrounded by matrix with bone-like histology. Analyses of quantitative microstructural parameters revealed that, compared to rat vertebrae, the bone-like mineralization pattern in the neural arches of skate vertebrae was more similar to compact bone than trabecular bone. In contrast, the thickness of the trabecular tesseral pattern was more similar to trabecular bone than compact bone of rat vertebrae. In conclusion, a bone-like tissue in neural arches of skate vertebrae appears to be a novel elasmobranch synapomorphy. We propose that the trabecular tesseral mineralization pattern in the skate might have deep homology to the mineralization pattern utilized in trabecular bone. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Mineralization patterns of skeletal tissues have not been investigated thoroughly in all vertebrate clades. Despite their designation as 'cartilaginous fish', chondrichthyans clearly evolved from ancestral vertebrates that made bone. The consensus that chondrichthyans lost the ability to make bone during their evolution, however, is challenged by reports of bone and bone-like tissues in the neural arches of vertebrae in extant sharks (selachians). Here, we provide evidence from micro-CT imaging and histological analyses to support our hypothesis that a bone-like tissue is present in the neural arches of batoids (the sister group to selachians within elasmobranchs). These results argue strongly that the neural arch bone-like tissue is a previously unknown synapomorphy of elasmobranchs. In addition to the bone-like mineralization pattern identified in the neural arches, micro-CT images also showed a novel mineralization pattern which we described as trabecular tesseral. Quantitative microstructural features shared between trabecular tesseral pattern and trabecular bone (from homologous rat vertebrae) suggest that both patterns might derive from an ancestral gene network driving trabecular mineralization (i.e., deep homology).