Evaluation of the ImmuView RSV Test for Rapid Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adult Patients with Influenza-Like Symptoms.

Rapid antigen tests may enhance the diagnostic yield of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections, but studies have shown low sensitivity in adults. We evaluated the novel ImmuView RSV test in adult patients with influenza-like symptoms who were prospectively enrolled at three emergency departments in two Swedish hospitals during two influenza seasons, 2017 to 2018 and 2018 to 2019. The ImmuView RSV test was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs and results were compared to those of the BinaxNOW RSV test. In the first season, tests were performed on frozen samples, while unfrozen samples were used in the second season. For comparison, tests were also performed on selected samples from children. Of 333 included adult patients, the sensitivity of ImmuView and BinaxNOW was 27% for both tests and specificities were 98% and 100%, respectively. The interassay agreement was good (κ = 0.61). There was no significant difference in test performance between frozen and unfrozen samples. In samples from children, the sensitivities of ImmuView and BinaxNOW were 67% and 70%, respectively. In conclusion, the ImmuView RSV test showed low sensitivity and high specificity for identifying RSV in adult patients with influenza-like symptoms, comparable with the BinaxNOW RSV test. Rapid RSV testing is of limited value for diagnosing RSV infection in adults. IMPORTANCE By timely RSV diagnosis among patients with influenza-like symptoms, especially when influenza diagnostics turn negative, it is possible to prevent unnecessary antibiotic usage as well as reduce diagnostic testing, nosocomial transmission, and hospital stay. Previous rapid RSV tests have demonstrated poor sensitivity in adults, and we could demonstrate that the novel ImmuView RSV test similarly showed limited value for diagnosing RSV infection in adult patients. However, in contrast to many other studies, we investigated patient characteristics in cases with false-positive tests and we compared the performance between unfrozen and frozen samples. Thus, our results are important, as they generate new knowledge about rapid antigen tests.

Comparison of the ImmuView and the BinaxNOW antigen tests in detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila in urine.

The use of urinary antigen tests (UATs) may provide early etiology in pneumonia, and facilitates rapid and directed antibiotic treatment. In this study, we evaluated the novel lateral flow ImmuView Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila UAT, which detects pneumococcal and L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigens in a combined test. We compared the ImmuView UAT with the BinaxNOW S. pneumoniae UAT and the BinaxNOW L. pneumophila UAT in 147 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia (n = 48), non-pneumococcal non-Legionella bacteremia (n = 93) and Legionella infections in the lower airways (L. pneumophila, n = 5; L. bozemanii, n = 1). In three cases, the ImmuView test was invalid before and after boiling while the BinaxNOW tests were valid in all cases. In 144 cases, the three UATs demonstrated a very good inter-assay agreement for detection of pneumococcal antigen (κ = 0.86) and L. pneumophila antigen (κ = 1.00). The ImmuView and BinaxNOW S. pneumoniae tests had similar sensitivities (62% vs 60%; p = ns) in 48 cases with pneumococcal bacteremia and both tests had specificities of 97% in 96 cases with non-pneumococcal infections. Furthermore, the ImmuView and BinaxNOW L. pneumophila tests were positive for Legionella antigen in five patients with confirmed L. pneumophila serogroup 1 infections, and negative in all non-L. pneumophila cases. The ImmuView and BinaxNOW tests performed similarly when evaluated on urine samples from bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients with identified etiology.

Rapid identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae in blood cultures by using the ImmuLex, Slidex and Wellcogen latex agglutination tests and the BinaxNOW antigen test.

Rapid identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae in blood culture (BC) bottles is important for early directed antimicrobial therapy in pneumococcal bacteraemia. We evaluated a new latex agglutination (LA) test on BC bottles, the ImmuLex™ S. pneumoniae Omni (Statens Serum Institut, Denmark), and compared the performance with the Slidex® pneumo-Kit (bioMérieux, France) and the Wellcogen™ S. pneumoniae (Remel, UK) LA tests, as well as the BinaxNOW® S. pneumoniae (Alere, USA) antigen test. The four tests were directly applied on 358 positive BC bottles with Gram-positive cocci in pairs or chains and on 15 negative bottles. Valid test results were recorded in all cases for ImmuLex and BinaxNOW and in 88.5 % (330/373) and 94.1 % (351/373) of cases for Slidex and Wellcogen, respectively. Based on bottles positive for S. pneumoniae by conventional methods, the sensitivity of ImmuLex was 99.6 %, similar to the other tests (range, 99.6-100 %). Based on bottles positive for non-pneumococcal pathogens, the specificity of ImmuLex was 82.6 %, in comparison to 97.6 % for Slidex (p < 0.01) and 85.4 % for Wellcogen (p = ns). The BinaxNOW test had a lower specificity (64.1 %) than any LA test (p < 0.01). On BC bottles positive for α-haemolytic streptococci, ImmuLex was positive in 12/67 (17.9 %) cases, Slidex in 2/59 (3.4 %) cases, Wellcogen in 11/64 (17.2 %) cases and BinaxNOW in 25/67 (37.3 %) cases. In conclusion, the ImmuLex test provides a valid and sensitive technique for the rapid detection of S. pneumoniae in BC bottles, similar to the other compared methods. However, the specificity was sub-optimal, since the test may cross-react with other Gram-positive bacteria.

The Uni-Gold™ Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test: an interassay comparison with the BinaxNOW® Streptococcus pneumoniae test on consecutive urine samples and evaluation on patients with bacteremia.

The performance of the recently commercialized Uni-Gold™ Streptococcus pneumoniae test for the detection of pneumococcal antigen in urine was studied in a multicenter study. First, we studied the interassay agreement between Uni-Gold™ and the BinaxNOW® S. pneumoniae urinary antigen test on 337 consecutive urine samples sent to the laboratory for the detection of pneumococcal antigen. The two tests performed similarly (κ = 0.82): both tests positive in 27 cases, both tests negative in 299 cases, and with divergent test results in 11 cases. Secondly, the tests were run on urine samples from 203 patients with bacteremia, including 51 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia. The sensitivities and specificities were 67 and 86 % for Uni-Gold™, and 57 % and 94 % for BinaxNOW®, respectively. The false-positivity rate was significantly higher for Uni-Gold™ compared with BinaxNOW® in patients with Escherichia coli bacteremia (15 vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.04), and tended to be higher in patients with bacteremia with alpha-hemolytic streptococci (32 vs. 11 %, p = 0.13). When cases with E. coli and alpha-hemolytic streptococci were excluded from the analysis, the overall false-positivity rate was 9/85 (11 %) for Uni-Gold™ and 6/85 (7.1 %) for BinaxNOW®. In conclusion, the study showed that Uni-Gold™ was not inferior to BinaxNOW® for the detection of pneumococcal urinary antigen in patients with pneumococcal bacteremia. The specificity of Uni-Gold™ was suboptimal due to false-positive results in cases with E. coli and alpha-hemolytic streptococci bacteremia. However, in patient populations usually subjected to testing for pneumococcal urinary antigen, such as pneumonia and meningitis patients, bacteremia with these pathogens is uncommon. The diagnostic usefulness of the Uni-Gold™ test should be further evaluated.