Right ventricular performance in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: the forgotten ventricle.

Right ventricular (RV) function is a major determinant of prognosis and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). It is largely unknown if HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients have some special characteristics in RV function (RVF) that may distinguish them from HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF) patients. Standard echocardiography was performed to estimate RVF [tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TDSV), plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), TAPSE to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) and RV myocardial performance index (MPI-TEI index)] in a cross-sectional study. In 306 participants, the RV systolic function evaluated with TAPSE and TDSV was impaired in 39.1 and 24.2%, respectively. TAPSE, TAPSE/PASP and TDSV were lower in HFmrEF compared with HFpEF and higher compared with HFrEF (p < 0.001 for among-groups comparison). RV diastolic dysfunction varied between 12.6 and 43.8% depending on the echocardiographic parameter. Diastolic RVF determined by tricuspid inflow E/A wave ratio (Et/At) was impaired in less patients with HFmrEF compared with those with HFpEF or HFrEF (25.9% vs 48.4% vs 56.3%; p = 0.030, respectively). RV diastolic dysfunction by et'/at' (tissue Doppler tricuspid valve annulus e' and a' waves) was impaired in less patients with HFmrEF compared with HFrEF (11.8% vs 33.3%; p = 0.019). A multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant association between RV and LV systolic dysfunction. The present study shows a high prevalence of RV dysfunction in HFmrEF patients. Study findings provides some new insights on RV and LV systolic dysfunction coupling whereas RV diastolic dysfunction was not dependent on LV systolic dysfunction.

Serum adipokine levels in patients with type 1 diabetes are associated with degree of obesity but only resistin is independently associated with atherosclerosis markers.

PURPOSE: The role of adipokines in causing inflammation and insulin resistance in normal weight and obese patients is generally well studied. However, there are often conflicting results regarding their levels in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients and their relationship to micro- and macrovascular disease. We therefore investigated which serum adipokine levels are independently associated with markers of early atherosclerosis and microvascular complications in patients with T1DM. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in the Diabetes Outpatient Clinic of Hippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. Sixty T1DM patients (30 females, mean age 38.8 ± 10.6 years, mean diabetes duration 17.4 ± 9.9 years) were included. Plasma adiponectin, leptin, and resistin, carotid artery intima media thickness (cIMT), and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity, PWV/SpygmoCor CP System and Mobil-O-Graph 24 h PWA) were assessed. RESULTS: Leptin and resistin levels were significantly higher in overweight and obese patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.039, respectively). Adiponectin was the only adipokine negatively correlated with BMI (rs = - 0.41, p = 0.001). We report a bivariate association between serum adiponectin levels and retinopathy (p = 0.007). Resistin was the only adipokine that showed significant correlation with systolic (rs = 0.42, p = 0.001) and diastolic (rs = 0.29, p = 0.024) hypertension and PWV (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Serum adipokine levels demonstrate similar bivariate associations with anthropometric variables in patients with T1DM to those in normal weight subjects. Although microvascular complications are associated with serum adipokine levels by bivariate analysis, only resistin, an inflammatory marker, is independently associated with arterial stiffness in patients with T1DM.

Ertugliflozin + metformin as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes.

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and the incidence of serious adverse kidney function events (chronic kidney disease, CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Ertugliflozin is the last SGLT2i approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA and European Medical Agency (EMA) in Europe for the treatment of T2DM alone or in combination with other drugs.Areas covered: The authors critically discuss in this drug evaluation the safety and efficacy of the ertugliflozin + metformin combination in patients with T2DM without complications, those with CKD, or those with heart failure (HF). Furthermore, the authors discuss the results of the VERTIS CV trial (MK-8835-004), the trials NCT01986881 and NCT01986855 and other smaller studies.Expert opinion: The ertugliflozin + metformin combination is safe and effective in patients with T2DM with renal impairment, HF of any kind, or those without diabetic complications. These have practical implications that will help diabetologists, cardiologists, internists, nephrologists and general practitioners in selecting the proper combination of SGLT2i on top of metformin, if needed.

Rosuvastatin and ezetimibe for the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction: Statins are powerful lipid-lowering agents which reduce cardiovascular (CV)-related morbidity and mortality. However, a large proportion of patients cannot attain the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, despite receiving maximally tolerated doses of high-intensity statins. Also, adherence to treatment may be reduced due to statin-induced myopathy or other side effects. For these reasons, guidelines recommend adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe.Areas covered: Authors discuss the main pharmacological characteristics of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects, as well as the clinical effects of the fixed dose combination of these drugs when used to treat dyslipidemia.Expert opinion: The rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination is safe and effective in patients with hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia with or without diabetes and with or without cardiovascular disease. This drug combination enabled higher proportions of patients to achieve recommended LDL-C goals than rosuvastatin monotherapy or the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, without additional adverse events. Despite the lack of additional CV outcomes data and comparisons with atorvastatin/ezetimibe, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe appears as a potent and generally well-tolerated drug combination eligible for the management of hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia in adults. Recently, the 40 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe fixed combination was approved and is also evaluated.

Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Treatment with 3 Different Statins of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Military Personnel. Do Genetics Play a Role?

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its severe form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are major health problems worldwide. Genetics may play a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH. AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of NAFLD/NASH in 5,400 military personnel and evaluate the effect of treatment with 3 statins on NAFLD/NASH using 2 non-invasive scores [NAFLD Activity Score (NAS); Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4)]. METHODS: During the mandatory annual medical check-up, military personnel underwent a clinical and laboratory evaluation. Participants with NAFLD/NASH were randomized into 4 groups (n=151 each): diet-exercise, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, or pitavastatin for 1 year (i.e., until the next routine evaluation). RESULTS: From all the participants, 613 had NAFLD/NASH (prevalence 11.3 vs 39.8% in the general population, p<0.001), and a total of 604 consented to participate in the study. After a year of treatment, the diet-exercise group showed no significant changes in both scores (NAS 4.98 baseline vs. 5.62, p=0.07; FIB-4 3.42 vs. 3.52, p=0.7). For the atorvastatin group, both scores were reduced (NAS 4.97 vs 1.95, p<0.001, FIB-4 3.56 vs 0.83, p<0.001), for rosuvastatin (NAS 5.55 vs 1.81, p<0.001, FIB-4 3.61 vs 0.79, p<0.001), and for pitavastatin (NAS 4.89 vs 1.99, p<0.001, FIB-4 3.78 vs 0.87, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and pitavastatin have a beneficial and safe effect in NAFLD/NASH patients as recorded by the improvement in the NAS (representing NAFLD activity) and FIB-4 (representing liver fibrosis) scores. Since both those with and without NAFLD/- NASH shared several baseline characteristics, genetics may play a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH and its treatment with statins.

Efficacy and safety of statin use in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Statins are the mainstay of treatment for patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). However, their efficacy and safety in children and adolescents with FH has not been well-documented. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate and meta-analyze the best available evidence from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of statins in this population. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane, up to 10 January 2020. Data were expressed as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The I2 index was employed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis (1191 patients, aged 13.3 ± 2.5 years). Compared with placebo, statins led to a mean relative reduction in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride and apolipoprotein B (apo-B) concentrations by -25.5% (95% CI -30.4%, -20.5%; I2 91%), -33.8% (95% CI -40.1%, -27.4%; I2 90%), -8.4% (95% CI -14.8%, -2.03%; I2 26%) and -28.8% (95% CI -33.9%, -23.6%; I2 83%), respectively. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was increased by 3.1% (95% CI 1.1%-5.2%; I2 0%). Statins were well-tolerated, with no significant differences in transaminase and creatine kinase levels or other adverse effects compared with placebo. Statins exerted no effect on growth or sexual development. CONCLUSION: Statins are quite effective in reducing TC, LDL-C, TG and apo-B and increasing HDL-C concentrations in children and adolescents with FH. No safety issues were seen with statin use.

Dysmetabolic Iron Overload in Metabolic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the association of dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome (DIOS) with metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: Several studies have shown that DIOS is associated with Mets, mainly through the pathogenesis of its components: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), essential hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and polycystic ovary syndrome (POS). RESULTS: Serum ferritin levels increase proportionally according to the degree of insulin resistance (IR) and the number of components of Mets. Moreover, DIOS predicts the onset of T2DM and NAFLD. Dysregulation of iron metabolism in DIOS is due to a multifactorial and dynamic process triggered by an unhealthy diet, facilitated by environmental and genetic cofactors, and resulting in a bidirectional relation between the liver and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Iron removal combined with a healthy diet improved both insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, but had no significant effect on blood glucose; however, phlebotomy therapy might be considered with conflicting results. CONCLUSION: Iron overload is closely associated with metabolic syndrome and its components; however, it remains under-appreciated in everyday clinical practice. Diet and lifestyle modification offer some clinical benefit; however, it is not adequate for successful management of the disease. The results of phlebotomy remain controversial, underlying the necessity of further efforts in this field.

Treatment strategies for hypertension in patients with type 1 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic, autoimmune disease that is characterized by total absence of insulin production. Hypertension is a common comorbidity in T1DM with complex pathophysiology, while it is also a well-recognized risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as other microvascular diabetic complications. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to present the current definitions, epidemiological data and prevalence rates of hypertension in T1DM, as well as to describe current therapeutic options. EXPERT OPINION: Hypertension affects around a third of the type 1 diabetic population, with higher prevalence rates in older individuals with longer disease duration. Although hypertension affects a substantial proportion of T1DM individuals, blood pressure control rates are disappointingly low. Alongside lifestyle modification, antihypertensive treatment should be initiated in those with blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg, with a systolic blood pressure target of 130 mmHg and lower, if tolerated. In those with established CVD or diabetic nephropathy, systolic blood pressure targets below 130 mmHg should be pursued. Initial pharmacotherapy should consist of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor. There is an urgent need for good quality data regarding proper antihypertensive treatment initiation, optimal BP targets and optimal antihypertensive treatment for better clinical outcomes.