Belantamab in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Triple-class Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Triple-class relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has a poor prognosis. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of Belantamab mafadotin in combination with dexamethasone (Bd) in triple-class RRMM. METHODS: We identified 35 patients with triple-class RRMM who received Bd at the University of Kansas from October 2019 to November 2021. RESULTS: The median age was 66 years (42-85) and the median prior lines of therapy was 5 (3-15). Nineteen (54%) patients had R-ISS stage III disease, 15 (43%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics, and 15 patients (43%) had extramedullary disease (EMD). Eight patients received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Overall response rate (ORR) was 43%, with 23% achieving very good partial response and better. At a median follow up of 10.7 months, the median progression-free survival and survival were 4.9 and 10.7 months, respectively. The most common adverse event was keratopathy, which occurred in 30 (86%) patients. Twenty-four patients required dose reduction or delay due to keratopathy. Other common toxicities included anemia (83%), thrombocytopenia (80%), neutropenia (34%), and elevated liver function tests (51%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows Bd has good activity in triple-class RRMM. Keratopathy remains a challenging AE and the leading cause of dose reduction, delay and treatment cessation.

Neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with plasma cell disorders who are on active treatment after two doses of mRNA vaccination.

Many patients with plasma cell disorder (PCD) on active treatment with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) require hospitalization, with an increased mortality rate over healthy adults. The FDA approved two mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. To assess the efficacy of vaccination in patients with PCD, retrospectively, we identified all patients on active treatment. A total of 149 patients were included. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) levels against SARS-CoV-2 adequate, intermediate, and no response were observed in 42%, 32%, and 26%, respectively. Low NAbs were seen in patients on daratumumab combinations or anti-BCMA therapy, low lymphocytes, and low IgG levels. Twenty-three (15%) patients have SARS CoV-2, while 8% required hospitalization, majority of these patients had intermediate or no response based on NAbs levels. Therefore, checking NAbs may be clinically helpful in identifying patients' responses. Further prospective studies should ascertain the value of a third vaccine dose in this population.

Intention to treat versus modified intention-to-treat analysis in B-cell maturation antigen and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has revolutionised treatment of haematological malignancies; however, current reporting uses a modified intention-to-treat analysis (mITT) which over-estimates efficacy. We assessed what proportion of CD19 and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CART trials report the number of patients not receiving CART after being enrolled by performing meta-analysis of the mITT and intention-to-treat (iTT) overall response rate (ORR). METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched. All prospective clinical trials of CD19 and BCMA-targeting CART enrolling two or greater patients from 1st January 2013 to 1st November 2020 were included. RESULTS: A total of 28 BCMA CART and 74 CD19 CART trials were identified. These included 10 BCMA CART (35.7%) and 52 (70.2%) CD19 CART trials reporting total number of patients enrolled and number of patients treated with CART. For this cohort of trials, the mITT ORR for BCMA CART was 78.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 67.0-89.0%), and the iTT ORR was 70.0% (95% CI = 59.0-80.0%). For CD19 leukaemia CART, the mITT ORR was 87.2% (95% CI = 83.1-91.2), and the iTT ORR was 74.9 (95% CI = 64.8-85.0). For CD19 lymphoma CART, the mITT ORR was 70.7% (95% CI = 63.9-77.5), and the iTT ORR was 58.7% (95% CI = 49.7-67.7). CONCLUSION: Across BCMA and CD19 CART trials, there is a difference of up to 8-12% in the ORR between modified and iTT analyses and a paucity of information regarding reasons why patients did not receive the intended study treatment.

Treatment of Advanced-Stage Large Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer (LCNEC) of the Lung: A Tale of Two Diseases.

LCNEC of the lung comprises a small proportion of pulmonary malignancies. Traditionally, they have been classified based on histologic and immunohistochemistry characteristics with features of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. The treatment outcome of advanced-stage LCNEC of the lung is poor with response rates ranging from 34 to 46% with platinum doublets, median progression-free survival (mPFS) ranging between 4.4 and 5.8 m, and median overall survival (mOS) ranging from 8 to 12.6 m. The optimal treatment strategy for LCNEC is debated given limited data and different outcomes based on chemotherapy type reported in the available literature. Recently, genomic profiling with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has been able to sub-classify LCNEC as SCLC-like or NSCLC-like. Treatment based on this sub-classification has improved outcomes by using SCLC and NSCLC regimens based on their genomic profile in retrospective analysis. Future studies in LCNEC of the lung should incorporate this new molecular sub-classification as stratification and possibly include SCLC-like LCNEC into SCLC studies and NSCLC-like into NSCLC studies.