Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 74: 196.e5-196.e7, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37833202

RESUMO

Treating shoulder dislocations is common in the emergency department and often requires procedural sedation. The use of acupuncture for treatment of chronic pain has been shown to be successful in various outpatient settings, and some EDs have recently incorporated acupuncture as an analgesia adjunct for chronic painful conditions to avoid opioid therapy. Limited data describe acupuncture to facilitate ED procedures. Here we present two cases of acute shoulder dislocation that were successfully treated with acupuncture as an alternative to parenteral pharmacologic procedural sedation. A 50 year old male sustained an anterior shoulder dislocation after an altercation, and a 59 year old female sustained an anterior dislocation after a fall. Instead of using conventional pharmacologic sedation and analgesia during shoulder reduction, both were treated with acupuncture in the ED. Reduction in both cases was rapid, safe, and avoided use of any parenteral medications, procedural sedation monitoring, or prolonged nurse observation. Using acupuncture as alternative to opioids for ED procedures deserves future study for orthopedic and other common ED procedures.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Anestesia , Luxação do Ombro , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Luxação do Ombro/terapia , Ombro , Dor , Analgésicos Opioides , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Sedação Consciente/métodos
2.
J Emerg Med ; 65(5): e371-e382, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37741737

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of induction agents for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) has been associated with hypotension in critically ill patients. Choice of induction agent may be important and the most commonly used agents are etomidate and ketamine. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of a single dose of ketamine vs. etomidate for RSI on maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and incidence of hypotension. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial compared the use of ketamine and etomidate for RSI in critically ill adult patients in the emergency department. The study was performed under Exception from Informed Consent. The primary outcome was the maximum SOFA score within 3 days of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were enrolled in the trial, 70 in the ketamine group and 73 in the etomidate group. Maximum median SOFA score for the ketamine group was 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-9) vs. 7 (IQR 5-9) for etomidate with no significant difference (-0.2; 95% CI -1.4 to 1.1; p = 0.79). The incidence of post-intubation hypotension was 28% in the ketamine group vs. 26% in the etomidate group (difference 2%; 95% CI -13% to 17%). There were no significant differences in intensive care unit outcomes. Thirty-day mortality rate for the ketamine group was 11% (8 deaths) and for the etomidate group was 21% (15 deaths), which was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in maximum SOFA score or post-intubation hypotension between critically ill adults receiving ketamine vs. etomidate for RSI.


Assuntos
Etomidato , Hipotensão , Ketamina , Adulto , Humanos , Etomidato/efeitos adversos , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Indução e Intubação de Sequência Rápida , Estado Terminal/terapia , Intubação Intratraqueal , Hipotensão/etiologia
3.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 910896, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36090378

RESUMO

Cognitive impairment is a common and pervasive feature of etiologically diverse disorders of the central nervous system, and a target indication for a growing number of symptomatic and disease modifying drugs. Remotely acquired digital endpoints have been recognized for their potential in providing frequent, real-time monitoring of cognition, but their ultimate value will be determined by the reliability and sensitivity of measurement in the populations of interest. To this end, we describe initial validation of remote self-administration of cognitive tests within a regulatorily compliant tablet-based platform. Participants were 61 older adults (age 55+), including 20 individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). To allow comparison between remote (in-home) and site-based testing, participants completed 2 testing sessions 1 week apart. Results for three of four cognitive domains assessed demonstrated equivalence between remote and site-based tests, with high cross-modality ICCs (absolute agreement) for Symbol Coding (ICC = 0.75), Visuospatial Working Memory (ICC = 0.70) and Verbal Fluency (ICC > 0.73). Group differences in these domains were significant and reflected sensitivity to objective cognitive impairment in the SCD group for both remote and site-based testing (p < 0.05). In contrast, performance on tests of verbal episodic memory suggested inflated performance during unmonitored testing and indicate reliable use of remote cognitive assessments may depend on the construct, as well as the population being tested.

4.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(4): 1917-1925, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and highly associated with loss of independence, caregiver burden, and assisted living placement. The need for cognitive functional capacity tools validated for use in PD clinical and research applications has thus been emphasized in the literature. The Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT-SL) is a tablet-based instrument that assesses proficiency for performing real world tasks in a highly realistic environment. OBJECTIVE: The present study explored application of the VRFCAT-SL in clinical assessments of patients with PD. Specifically, we examined associations between VRFCAT-SL performance and measures of cognition, motor severity, and self-reported cognitive functioning. METHODS: The VRFCAT-SL was completed by a sample of 29 PD patients seen in clinic for a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Fifteen patients met Movement Disorders Society Task Force criteria for mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI); no patients were diagnosed with dementia. Non-parametric correlations between VRFCAT-SL performance and standardized neuropsychological tests and clinical measures were examined. RESULTS: VRFCAT-SL performance was moderately associated with global rank on neuropsychological testing and discriminated PD-MCI. Follow-up analyses found completion time was associated with visual memory, sustained attention, and set-switching, while errors were associated with psychomotor inhibition. No clinical or motor measures were associated with VRFCAT-SL performance. Self-report was not associated with VRFCAT-SL or neuropsychological test performance. CONCLUSION: The VRFCAT-SL appears to provide a useful measure of cognitive functional capacity that is not confounded by PD motor symptoms. Future studies will examine utility in PD dementia.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia
5.
Schizophr Res ; 223: 297-304, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928621

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cognition and functional capacity predict functional outcomes in mental illness. Traditional approaches conceptualize cognition as comprised of domains, but many studies support a unifactorial structure. Some functional capacity measures may share a single-factor structure with cognition. In this study, we examined the factor structure of two measures of functional capacity, a conventional assessment and a newer computerized assessment, testing for a shared factor structure with cognition. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls were examined with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), the UCSD Performance Based Skills Assessment (UPSA), and the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT). Models of the factor structures of the MCCB, UPSA, and VRFCAT were calculated, as were correlations between MCCB scores and individual VRFCAT objectives. RESULTS: The MCCB, VRFCAT, and UPSA all had unifactorial structures. The best fitting model of the correlations between MCCB and UPSA was a shared single factor, while the best fit for the relationship between MCCB and VRFCAT had two factors. Correlations between the MCCB domain and composite scores and the VRFCAT objectives suggested global rather than specific patterns of correlation. DISCUSSION: The relationship between cognitive performance and functional capacity was found to vary across functional capacity assessments. The UPSA and MCCB were not differentiated into separate factors, suggesting that the UPSA may overlap with neurocognitive performance. However, the VRFCAT appears to measure functional abilities that are separable from, yet correlated with, neurocognitive performance. It may provide a more distinctive assessment of the functional capacity construct.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos , Esquizofrenia , Atividades Cotidianas , Cognição , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/complicações
6.
J Emerg Med ; 59(4): 590-592, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric resuscitator bags are equipped with a positive-pressure relief ("pop-off") valve meant to prevent delivery of excessive pressure. Pop-off valves, however, can lead to adverse events in emergency situations when providers are unaware of their significance. CASE REPORT: A 3-year-old girl with muscular atrophy and a chronic tracheostomy tube was noted to have decreasing oxygen saturations. Paramedics found the patient in cardiac arrest and initiated resuscitative efforts; the patient regained pulses but quickly became pulseless again. There were two more cycles of cardiac arrest followed by return of spontaneous circulation. When she arrived at the emergency department pulses were present. The emergency physician performed bag ventilation and felt no resistance to bag squeezing, but saw no chest rise, and realized the patient was not being ventilated because all of the air was escaping through the pop-off valve. When the valve was closed, it was impossible to perform bag ventilation. She was found to have complete occlusion of her tracheostomy tube; the paramedics had not been ventilating during transport, though were unaware of the occlusion because of the open pop-off valve. Removal of the tracheostomy tube and placement of an endotracheal tube significantly improved ventilation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Pop-off valves are common on pediatric resuscitator bags, but often result in insufficient ventilation and oxygenation during emergency airway management. Emergency airway experts recommend that pop-off valves be avoided or deactivated during emergency resuscitation, but this information has not been widely disseminated.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal , Ressuscitação
7.
Schizophr Res ; 210: 30-38, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31196736

RESUMO

This review of research utilizing the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) outlines the development, evaluation, validation, and implementation of the SCoRS to assess whether the scale meets the criteria as a functional co-primary as defined by the MATRICS-CT initiative. Interview-based co-primary assessments should be: 1) practical and easy to administer for a clinician or researcher; 2) validated in individuals with schizophrenia; 3) contain the relevant areas of cognition and functioning applicable to schizophrenia; 4) able to assess all phases and severity levels of schizophrenia; 5) capable of monitoring disease progression; 6) minimal burden to patients; and 7) sensitive to assess treatment effects. A review of the literature was conducted to present information on the development, psychometric properties and usage of the SCoRS. Review of the development of the SCoRS followed the parameters outlined for scale development on content expert validation and feedback. The SCoRS shows good psychometric properties in various studies, and demonstrates low burden on clinicians and patients. The items measure global concepts that do not require notable cultural modification, making international use feasible. While multiple performance-based tests in cognition and functional outcomes are available, there is a need for a multi-domain, interview-based assessment of cognitive progression and treatment response in clinical trials. The SCoRS appears to meet many of the criteria for an optimal co-primary measure for schizophrenia cognition clinical trials as defined in the MATRICS-CT initiative.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/complicações
8.
Psychiatry Res ; 277: 58-63, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30679049

RESUMO

Virtual Reality (VR) approaches have had considerable success in measurement of functional capacity. However, it is not clear if factors other than cognitive impairment influence performance on VR measures. Many people with schizophrenia have significant negative symptoms and they could reduce engagement in assessment. 158 patients with schizophrenia performed the VRFCAT, were tested with the MCCB, were rated with the PANSS, and were rated on everyday functioning. Scores for reduced emotional experience and reduced expression were derived. Reduced emotional experience, but not reduced expression, was correlated with socially relevant VRFCAT subtasks and real-world social functioning. Performance on the socially relevant subtasks, but not the solitary subtasks, shared variance with work outcomes. MCCB performance was associated with both subdomains, but socially relevant subtasks shared more variance. Patients with higher reduced emotional experience validly engaged in socially relevant VR simulations, as indexed by correlations with outcome measures. These patients had poorer performance on socially relevant tasks than on solitary tasks. The differential validity of solitary vs. socially relevant simulations was supported by differences in correlates, suggesting that assessments with a focus on performance of simulated socially relevant tasks could be developed.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Realidade Virtual , Adulto , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ajustamento Social
9.
Memory ; 27(3): 397-409, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30152262

RESUMO

Evidence for false recognition within seconds of encoding suggests that semantic-associative influences are not restricted to long-term memory, consistent with unitary memory accounts but contrary to dual store models. The present study sought further relevant evidence using a modified free recall converging associates task where participants studied 12-item lists composed of 3 semantically distinct quartets (sublists) related to a separate, non-presented theme word (i.e., words 1-4/theme1, 5-8/theme2, and 9-12/theme3). This list construction permits assessment of false recall errors from each sublist, and, particularly, the primacy and recency sublists that have been linked to long- and short-term memory stores. Experiment 1 tested immediate free recall for items. Associative false memories were evident from all sublists, however, significantly less so from the recent sublist, which also showed the highest levels of veridical memory. By inserting a brief (3 s) distractor prior to recall, Experiment 2 selectively reduced veridical memory and increased false memory for the recent sublist while leaving the primacy sublist unaffected. These recall results converge with prior evidence indicating the immediacy of false recognition, and can be understood within a unitary framework where the differential availability of verbatim features and gist-based cues affect memory for primacy and recency sublists.


Assuntos
Memória de Curto Prazo , Rememoração Mental/fisiologia , Semântica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reconhecimento Psicológico , Adulto Jovem
10.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ; 4: 314-323, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094331

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires reliable and validated methods to detect subtle cognitive changes. The battery of standardized cognitive assessments that is used for diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD in the TOMMORROW study have only been fully validated in English-speaking countries. We conducted a validation and normative study of the German language version of the TOMMORROW neuropsychological test battery, which tests episodic memory, language, visuospatial ability, executive function, and attention. METHODS: German-speaking cognitively healthy controls (NCs) and subjects with AD were recruited from a memory clinic at a Swiss medical center. Construct validity, test-retest, and alternate form reliability were assessed in NCs. Criterion and discriminant validities of the cognitive measures were tested using logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Cross-cultural equivalency of performance of the German language tests was compared with English language tests. RESULTS: A total of 198 NCs and 25 subjects with AD (aged 65-88 years) were analyzed. All German language tests discriminated NCs from persons with AD. Episodic memory tests had the highest potential to discriminate with almost twice the predictive power of any other domain. Test-retest reliability of the test battery was adequate, and alternate form reliability for episodic memory tests was supported. For most tests, age was a significant predictor of group effect sizes; therefore, normative data were stratified by age. Validity and reliability results were similar to those in the published US cognitive testing literature. DISCUSSION: This study establishes the reliability and validity of the German language TOMMORROW test battery, which performed similarly to the English language tests. Some variations in test performance underscore the importance of regional normative values. The German language battery and normative data will improve the precision of measuring cognition and diagnosing incident mild cognitive impairment due to AD in clinical settings in German-speaking countries.

11.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 74(8): 807-814, 2017 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28636694

RESUMO

Importance: Patients' previous experience with performance-based cognitive tests in clinical trials for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia can create practice-related improvements. Placebo-controlled trials for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia are at risk for these practice effects, which can be difficult to distinguish from placebo effects. Objectives: To conduct a systematic evaluation of the magnitude of practice effects on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) in cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia and to examine which demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics were associated with improvement in placebo conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A blinded review was conducted of data from 813 patients with schizophrenia who were treated with placebo in 12 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted mostly in outpatient clinics in North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America from February 22, 2007, to March 1, 2014. A total of 779 patients provided data for the primary outcome measure at baseline and at least 1 follow-up. Seven trials had prebaseline assessments wherein the patients knew that they were not receiving treatment, allowing a comparison of practice and placebo effects in the same patients. Interventions: Placebo compared with various experimental drug treatments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite score on the MCCB. Results: Of the 813 patients in the study (260 women and 553 men; mean [SD] age, 41.2 [11.5] years), the mean MCCB composite score at baseline was 22.8 points below the normative mean, and the mean (SEM) total change in the MCCB during receipt of placebo was 1.8 (0.2) T-score points (95% CI, 1.40-2.18), equivalent to a change of 0.18 SD. Practice effects in the 7 studies in which there was a prebaseline assessment were essentially identical to the postbaseline placebo changes. Baseline factors associated with greater improvements in the MCCB during receipt of placebo included more depression/anxiety (F1,438 = 5.41; P = .02), more motivation (F1,272 = 4.63; P = .03), and less improvement from screening to baseline (F1,421 = 59.32; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Placebo effects were minimal and associated with the number of postbaseline assessments and several patient characteristics. Given that the patients performed 2.28 SDs below normative standards on average at baseline, a mean placebo-associated improvement of less than 0.2 SD provides evidence that ceiling effects do not occur in these trials. These minimal changes in the MCCB could not be responsible for effective active treatments failing to separate from placebo.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/psicologia , Efeito Placebo , Prática Psicológica , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Adulto , Transtornos Cognitivos/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/complicações , Adulto Jovem
12.
Schizophr Res ; 190: 172-179, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28433500

RESUMO

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was developed to assess cognitive treatment effects in schizophrenia clinical trials, and is considered the FDA gold standard outcome measure for that purpose. The aim of the present study was to establish pre-treatment psychometric characteristics of the MCCB in a large pooled sample. The dataset included 2616 stable schizophrenia patients enrolled in 15 different clinical trials between 2007 and 2016 within the United States (94%) and Canada (6%). The MCCB was administered twice prior to the initiation of treatment in 1908 patients. Test-retest reliability and practice effects of the cognitive composite score, the neurocognitive composite score, which excludes the domain Social Cognition, and the subtests/domains were examined using Intra-Class Correlations (ICC) and Cohen's d. Simulated regression models explored which domains explained the greatest portion of variance in composite scores. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC=0.88) for both composite scores. Practice effects were small for the cognitive (d=0.15) and neurocognitive (d=0.17) composites. Simulated bootstrap regression analyses revealed that 3 of the 7 domains explained 86% of the variance for both composite scores. The domains that entered most frequently in the top 3 positions of the regression models were Speed of Processing, Working Memory, and Visual Learning. Findings provide definitive psychometric characteristics and a benchmark comparison for clinical trials using the MCCB. The test-retest reliability of the MCCB composite scores is considered excellent and the learning effects are small, fulfilling two of the key criteria for outcome measures in cognition clinical trials.


Assuntos
Cognição , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Análise de Regressão , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores Sexuais
13.
Innov Clin Neurosci ; 14(11-12): 30-40, 2017 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29410935

RESUMO

Objective: Recognizing the discrete dimensions that underlie negative symptoms in schizophrenia and how these dimensions are understood across localities might result in better understanding and treatment of these symptoms. To this end, the objectives of this study were to 1) identify the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom dimensions of expressive deficits and experiential deficits and 2) analyze performance on these dimensions over 15 geographical regions to determine whether the items defining them manifest similar reliability across these regions. Design: Data were obtained for the baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale visits of 6,889 subjects across 15 geographical regions. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we examined whether a two-factor negative symptom structure that is found in schizophrenia (experiential deficits and expressive deficits) would be replicated in our sample, and using differential item functioning, we tested the degree to which specific items from each negative symptom subfactor performed across geographical regions in comparison with the United States. Results: The two-factor negative symptom solution was replicated in this sample. Most geographical regions showed moderate-to-large differential item functioning for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale expressive deficit items, especially N3 Poor Rapport, as compared with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale experiential deficit items, showing that these items might be interpreted or scored differently in different regions. Across countries, except for India, the differential item functioning values did not favor raters in the United States. Conclusion: These results suggest that the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom factor can be better represented by a two-factor model than by a single-factor model. Additionally, the results show significant differences in responses to items representing the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale expressive factors, but not the experiential factors, across regions. This could be due to a lack of equivalence between the original and translated versions, cultural differences with the interpretation of items, dissimilarities in rater training, or diversity in the understanding of scoring anchors. Knowing which items are challenging for raters across regions can help to guide Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale training and improve the results of international clinical trials aimed at negative symptoms.

14.
Schizophr Res ; 181: 100-106, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27771201

RESUMO

Computerized tests benefit from automated scoring procedures and standardized administration instructions. These methods can reduce the potential for rater error. However, especially in patients with severe mental illnesses, the equivalency of traditional and tablet-based tests cannot be assumed. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) is a pen-and-paper cognitive assessment tool that has been used in hundreds of research studies and clinical trials, and has normative data available for generating age- and gender-corrected standardized scores. A tablet-based version of the BACS called the BAC App has been developed. This study compared performance on the BACS and the BAC App in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Test equivalency was assessed, and the applicability of paper-based normative data was evaluated. Results demonstrated the distributions of standardized composite scores for the tablet-based BAC App and the pen-and-paper BACS were indistinguishable, and the between-methods mean differences were not statistically significant. The discrimination between patients and controls was similarly robust. The between-methods correlations for individual measures in patients were r>0.70 for most subtests. When data from the Token Motor Test was omitted, the between-methods correlation of composite scores was r=0.88 (df=48; p<0.001) in healthy controls and r=0.89 (df=46; p<0.001) in patients, consistent with the test-retest reliability of each measure. Taken together, results indicate that the tablet-based BAC App generates results consistent with the traditional pen-and-paper BACS, and support the notion that the BAC App is appropriate for use in clinical trials and clinical practice.


Assuntos
Cognição , Computadores de Mão , Diagnóstico por Computador , Aplicativos Móveis , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
15.
Schizophr Res ; 175(1-3): 90-96, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091656

RESUMO

Regulatory guidance for schizophrenia cognition clinical trials requires that the assessment of cognitive change is accompanied by a functionally meaningful endpoint. However, currently available measures are challenged by resistance to change, psychometric weaknesses, and for interview-based assessments, dependence upon the presence of an informant. The aims of the current study were to: 1) assess the validity, sensitivity, and reliability of the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) as a measure of functional capacity; 2) determine the association between performance on the VRFCAT and performance on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB); and 3) compare the metrics of the VRFCAT with the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA). 167 patients with schizophrenia and 166 healthy controls completed the VRFCAT, UPSA, and the MCCB at baseline. The VRFCAT and UPSA were completed again at follow-up. The VRFCAT, MCCB, and UPSA were very sensitive to impairment in schizophrenia (d=1.16 to 1.22). High test-retest reliability was demonstrated for VRFCAT total completion time and the UPSA total score in patients (ICC=0.81 and 0.78, respectively). The UPSA demonstrated significant practice effects in patients (d=0.35), while the VRFCAT did not (d=-0.04). VRFCAT total completion time was correlated with both UPSA (r=-0.56, p<0.0001 for patients and -0.58, p<0.0001 for controls) and MCCB Composite (r=-0.57, p<0.0001 for patients and -0.68, p<0.0001 for controls). The VRFCAT is a highly reliable and sensitive measure of functional capacity with associations to the UPSA and MCCB. These results provide encouraging support for a computerized functional capacity assessment for use in schizophrenia.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Computador , Testes Psicológicos , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Interface Usuário-Computador
16.
Self Identity ; 15(5): 536-547, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28042287

RESUMO

This research examines the relationship between one's theory of a good life and allostatic load, a marker of cumulative biological risk, and how this relationship differs by socioeconomic status. Among adults with a bachelor's degree or higher, those who saw individual characteristics (e.g., personal happiness, effort) as part of a good life had lower levels of allostatic load than those who did not. In contrast, among adults with less than a bachelor's degree, those who saw supportive relationships as part of a good life had lower levels of allostatic load than those who did not. These findings extend past research on socioeconomic differences in the emphasis individual or relational factors and suggest that one's theory of a good life has health implications.

17.
Schizophr Res Cogn ; 1(1): e21-e26, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25083416

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of functional capacity is an intrinsic part of determining the functional relevance of response to treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Existing methods are highly and consistently correlated with performance on neuropsychological tests, but most current assessments of functional capacity are still paper and pencil simulations. We developed a computerized virtual reality assessment that contains all of the components of a shopping trip. METHODS: We administered the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) to 54 healthy controls and to 51 people with schizophrenia to test its feasibility. Dependent variables for the VRFCAT included time to completion and errors on 12 objectives and the number of times that an individual failed to complete an objective. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and a standard functional capacity measure, the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) were administered to the patients with schizophrenia. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia performed more poorly than healthy controls on 10/11 of the time variables, as well as 2/12 error scores and 2/12 failed objectives. Pearson correlations for 7 of 15 VRFCAT variables with MCCB composite scores were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These results provide support for the possibility of computerized functional capacity assessment, but more substantial studies are required.

18.
J Vis Exp ; (86)2014 Apr 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24798174

RESUMO

Cognitive impairments affect the majority of patients with schizophrenia and these impairments predict poor long term psychosocial outcomes.  Treatment studies aimed at cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia not only require demonstration of improvements on cognitive tests, but also evidence that any cognitive changes lead to clinically meaningful improvements.  Measures of "functional capacity" index the extent to which individuals have the potential to perform skills required for real world functioning.  Current data do not support the recommendation of any single instrument for measurement of functional capacity.  The Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) is a novel, interactive gaming based measure of functional capacity that uses a realistic simulated environment to recreate routine activities of daily living. Studies are currently underway to evaluate and establish the VRFCAT's sensitivity, reliability, validity, and practicality. This new measure of functional capacity is practical, relevant, easy to use, and has several features that improve validity and sensitivity of measurement of function in clinical trials of patients with CNS disorders.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Software , Jogos de Vídeo
19.
Neuropsychology ; 26(4): 509-16, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22746309

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study measured distortions of memory during short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) versions of a semantically associated word list learning paradigm. Performance of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD; MMSE ≥16) was compared with performance of age-matched, healthy older adult participants. METHOD: In a STM version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) task, participants viewed four-word lists and were prompted for recall after a brief interval. The LTM task tested recall memory for 12-word lists. RESULTS: Compared with the healthy group, the AD participants show greater impairment on the LTM task than on the STM task, although veridical recall is significantly reduced on both tasks. Furthermore, on both memory tasks, (1) participants with AD generate more nonsemantic intrusions than healthy older adult participants, and (2) semantic intrusion rate, when computed as a proportion of total recall, does not differ between groups. Notably, nonsemantic intrusions are consistently high for AD participants across both STM and LTM despite a marked difference in recall accuracy (65% and 23%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: STM impairment with some preserved semantic processing is evident in AD. The extent and variety of intrusions reported by AD participants indicates a breakdown in their ability to monitor and constrain their recall responses, even within seconds of initial learning.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/complicações , Transtornos da Memória/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Memória/etiologia , Memória de Longo Prazo/fisiologia , Memória de Curto Prazo/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Semântica
20.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) ; 64(7): 1442-56, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21604232

RESUMO

During a conversation, we hear the sound of the talker as well as the intended message. Traditional models of speech perception posit that acoustic details of a talker's voice are not encoded with the message whereas more recent models propose that talker identity is automatically encoded. When shadowing speech, listeners often fail to detect a change in talker identity. The present study was designed to investigate whether talker changes would be detected when listeners are actively engaged in a normal conversation, and visual information about the speaker is absent. Participants were called on the phone, and during the conversation the experimenter was surreptitiously replaced by another talker. Participants rarely noticed the change. However, when explicitly monitoring for a change, detection increased. Voice memory tests suggested that participants remembered only coarse information about both voices, rather than fine details. This suggests that although listeners are capable of change detection, voice information is not continuously monitored at a fine-grain level of acoustic representation during natural conversation and is not automatically encoded. Conversational expectations may shape the way we direct attention to voice characteristics and perceive differences in voice.


Assuntos
Surdez/fisiopatologia , Idioma , Reconhecimento Psicológico/fisiologia , Acústica da Fala , Percepção da Fala/fisiologia , Telefone , Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fonética , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...