Performance of Forward Roll Maneuvers Following Corrective Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Fusion surgeries for scoliosis patients are believed to deteriorate sports performance; in particular, forward roll should deteriorate, but no literature is available to substantiate this claim. HYPOTHESIS: The extent of postoperative deterioration can vary according to surgery type or curve type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Idiopathic scoliosis patients between 10 and 29 years of age who underwent correction and fusion surgeries at our hospital were included in this study. Forward roll was recorded on video preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Performances were evaluated twice on a 10-point scale by two blinded examiners. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative upright spinal radiographs were analyzed for the Lenke classification, number of fused vertebrae, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, major curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: The average age was 16 years. Curve types according to the Lenke classification were: 15, type 1; 5, type 2; 14, type 5; 2, type 6. The mean number of fused vertebrae was 6.9 (3.2 for anterior surgeries and 9.3 for posterior surgeries). The mean preoperative assessment of forward roll was 9.6 points, and the 1-year postoperative assessment was lower at 8.8 points. Cluster analysis classified patients into 3 groups: long fusion with marked performance deterioration (C1), long fusion with minimal deterioration (C2), and short fusion with minimal deterioration (C3). The upper and lower instrumented vertebrae in C1 were more distal than those in C2. CONCLUSION: Patients with thoracic curves were classified into two groups, and patients who underwent surgeries with more distal upper and lower instrumented vertebra levels exhibited lower postoperative performance. However, patients with Lenke 5 curves who underwent anterior surgery showed better preoperative performance than other patients who underwent posterior surgery, showing minimal postoperative deterioration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III;Therapeutic Study.

Minimum 20 Years Long-term Clinical Outcome After Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation for Scoliosis: Comparison of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire With That in Nonscoliosis Group.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective minimum 20-year follow-up study using 4 standard self-administered questionnaires, one of which, the SRS-22 was also administered to control groups. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term postoperative pain and other clinical outcomes of scoliosis correction and fusion surgery with Harrington instrumentation using Moe square-ended rods for better preservation of sagittal alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Only a few long-term outcome studies have used standardized and validated self-administered tools, and no studies have established SRS-22 control data within their own population. There is no previous minimum 20-year follow-up evaluation after correction surgery preserving thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. METHODS: Of 86 consecutive patients who underwent instrumentation surgery for scoliosis by a single surgeon, 61 patients participated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaires and 51 patients were included in this study. Results were analyzed for pain and other clinical outcomes. A total of 771 hospital employees were sent SRS-22 questionnaires. A total of 763 responded, resulting in 2 control groups composed of nonscoliosis and untreated mild scoliosis controls of the same culture and language as the long-term follow-up group. RESULTS: The prevalence of continuous low back pain was about 15%. Average Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores at follow-up were 25 points, 7.3%, and 1.6, respectively. The average SRS-22 scores were 4.2 (function), 4.3 (pain), 3.7 (self-image), and 3.9 (mental health) for the postoperative follow-up group compared with 4.5 (function), 4.3 (pain), 3.5 (self-image), and 3.5 (mental health) for the nonscoliosis controls. CONCLUSION: Improved preservation of normal sagittal alignment resulted in a prevalence of low back pain comparable with the age-matched general population. Moreover, SRS-22 results for self-image and mental health were positive compared with the controls, possibly reflecting the surgeon's emphases on mental health and management of patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Differences between pre-existing type and de novo type left convex thoracolumbar / lumbar scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Lenke 5C type adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a Cobb angle of over 30 degrees has high risk of progression. The need for corrective surgeries for degenerative lumbar scoliosis has been increasing these days and some of those cases are pre-existing type scoliosis. However, it is said to be difficult to differentiate pre-existing type scoliosis from de novo type scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relevant X ray metrics of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and to discover differences between pre-existing and de novo type scoliosis. METHODS: Of 54 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as candidates for corrective surgery for left convex thoracolumbar / lumbar scoliosis since December 2008, 19 patients over age 50 were included in this study. The average age was 60 years old (50-80 years old). All patients were female. Coronal and sagittal parameters were contrasted between two groups divided according to the existence of scoliosis in their adolescence; clear (AIS) and unclear (de novo). RESULTS: Eleven were AIS, and 8 were de novo. The average age was 54.0 years old for AIS and 67.4 for de novo (p<0.05). Cobb angles (69°, 49°) and L4 tilt (30°, 22°) were found to be significantly greater in AIS. Nash-Moe rotation assessment showed that rotational deformity was greater in AIS type than in de novo type. Lumbar lordosis (28°, 32°), thoracolumbar kyphosis (24°, 12°), sagittal vertical axis (37mm, 58mm), and pelvic incidence (51°, 60°) showed no significant difference between the groups, however, pelvic tilt (24°, 33°) showed significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients over 50 with degenerative thoracolumbar / lumbar scoliosis, those with pre-existing type scoliosis were found to have greater Cobb angle, greater L4 tilt, greater rotational deformity, less pelvic tilt, and were candidates for surgery at a younger age than those with de novo type scoliosis. In other words, those with de novo type scoliosis have less coronal deformity and worse sagittal pelvic alignment than those with pre-existing type scoliosis and are not considered candidates for surgery until a more advanced age. This study demonstrates some differences between pre-existing and de novo type scoliosis, contrasts the natural history of the two types of candidates for thoracolumbar / lumbar scoliosis surgery, and suggests the importance of performing surgery for Lenke 5C type adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at a younger age.