Efficacy of online communication partner training package for student healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: People with aphasia are vulnerable recipients of healthcare. The nature of the communicative environment and the communication disability can adversely impact access to timely and quality healthcare. Student healthcare professionals are often underprepared to interact successfully with people with aphasia and may benefit from communication partner training (CPT). AIMS: To investigate the potential effectiveness and acceptability of a brief, two-part introductory Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia (SCA™)-based CPT package, delivered to a sample of students across a diverse range of healthcare disciplines. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A pre-post-within group experimental design was used to investigate the potential effectiveness and acceptability of an online CPT package (50 minute module + 1 hour workshop) for healthcare students. The Aphasia Attitudes, Strategies and Knowledge (AASK) survey measured participants' knowledge of aphasia, facilitative communication strategies and attitudes towards people with aphasia. Data were collected pre-training, following the training module and following the workshop, and 6 weeks post-training. Statistical analysis was conducted on the AASK data. In addition, participant feedback (ratings and open text responses) was collected after the workshop. Ratings were analysed descriptively, and thematic content analysis was used for open text responses. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: 236 participants completed the pre-training AASK and 106 completed the AASK at subsequent time points. Statistically significant gains were demonstrated from pre- to post-module completion. Between the end of the module and the end of the workshop, some gains were maintained and others showed further statistically significantly improvements. While all gains were not maintained at the 6-week follow-up, statistically significantly improvements from pre-training scores remained evident. Student feedback was predominantly positive, with suggested improvements for training content and length. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The results provide preliminary evidence that a brief, online CPT package can support student healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards aphasia and communicating with people with aphasia. Online training was acceptable to students and feasible as an embedded or optional component of curriculum. Ongoing training (e.g., in the form of refresher sessions) and inclusion of a skills-based component are recommended to maximize communication skill development. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Student healthcare professionals recognize the need to develop knowledge and skills to successfully support people with communication disability, such as aphasia, to participate effectively in their healthcare. Evidence in favour of online communication partner training for student healthcare professionals is currently limited. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study demonstrates that a brief introductory online communication partner training program can be efficacious for improving knowledge and attitudes regarding communicating with people who have aphasia. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Students will likely need further ongoing refresher training with inclusion of practical components to develop and maintain the knowledge and skills required to be proficient communication partners with people with aphasia.

Cognitive and Behavioral Digital Health Interventions for People with Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to cognitive linguistic deficits that significantly impact on quality of life and well-being. Digital health offers timely access to specialized services; however, there are few synthesized reviews in this field. This review evaluates and synthesizes reports of digital health interventions in TBI rehabilitation and caregiver education. Systematic searches of nine databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, speechBITE, and PsycBITE) were conducted from database inception to February 2022. Studies were included of interventions where the primary treatment focus (> 50%) was on improving communication, social, psychological or cognitive skills of people with TBI and/or communication partners. Data on participants, characteristics of the interventions, outcome measures and findings were collected. Risk of bias was accounted for through methodological quality assessments (PEDro-P and PEDro+, Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials) and intervention description. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic synthesis. Forty-four articles met eligibility criteria: 20 randomized controlled trials, three single-case experimental designs, six non-randomized controlled trials, nine case series studies, and two case studies. Studies comprised 3666 people with TBI and 213 carers. Methodological quality was varied and intervention description was poor. Most interventions were delivered via a single digital modality (e.g., telephone), with few using a combination of modalities. Five interventions used co-design with key stakeholders. Digital health interventions for people with TBI and their caregivers are feasible and all studies reported positive outcomes; however, few included blind assessors. Improved methodological rigor, clearly described intervention characteristics and consistent outcome measurement is recommended. Further research is needed regarding multi-modal digital health interventions.

Characteristics and impacts of community aphasia group facilitation: a systematic scoping review.

PURPOSE: Community aphasia groups (CAGs) can provide a range of benefits to people with aphasia and support long-term psychosocial wellbeing. However, the dominant speech-pathologist-led service delivery model is inherently limited in scope. Peer-led groups hold potential as a sustainable and empowering extension of this traditional model. The implementation of peer-led models likely requires targeted training and support, however little is known about the characteristics and impacts of CAG facilitation. This study reviews the literature on CAGs and their facilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review on this topic. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven texts were included, reporting on a heterogeneous range of activities. Most texts reported on speech-pathologist-led groups, however, a range of alternative models were also represented. While no studies directly compared the impacts of different facilitation models, some comparative benefits could be drawn from the literature. Facilitation was perceived as complex and challenging, and significant gaps were identified in the training of facilitators. Ten qualitative studies investigated characteristics and impacts of facilitator behaviours, providing a useful foundation for future development of training and evaluation tools. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation into alternative facilitation models and facilitator training needs will likely support the proliferation of high-quality CAGs.Implications for RehabilitationCommunity aphasia groups (CAGs) play an important role in supporting identity and wellbeing for individuals with chronic aphasia.The traditional speech-pathology led model of group service delivery is limited in scope; the addition of peer- and volunteer-led CAGs may facilitate access to groups and meet a range of different needs for individuals with aphasia.CAG facilitation is a complex and challenging task, likely requiring specialised training, however, this has not been widely available to facilitators.The development of specialised facilitator training will likely support the proliferation of sustainable and high-quality CAGs.

Acceptability of telehealth-delivered rehabilitation: Experiences and perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury and their carers.

INTRODUCTION: Communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their carers is recommended best practice. Delivery via telehealth could improve access to this training. This paper focuses on the acceptability of telehealth delivery of communication skills training. METHODS: A mixed-methods investigation of acceptability of telehealth to people with TBI and their carers was incorporated into a clinical trial. Thirty-six people with TBI (23 metropolitan and 13 regional) and their carers were recruited. Metropolitan participants were randomly allocated to telehealth or in-person intervention at a 1:3 ratio. Regional participants were allocated to telehealth. Telehealth and in-person participants were compared on retention, time to complete the programme, home practice completion and therapeutic alliance ratings. Participants completed semi-structured interviews regarding their views on telehealth, which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between telehealth and in-person participants in retention rate, time to complete the programme, degree of home practice completion or therapeutic alliance ratings. Three themes were identified: 'telehealth delivery opens a window for access to rehabilitation in the context of my daily life', 'in-person delivery offers rehabilitation based on natural human interaction' and 'weighing telehealth against in-person delivery'. DISCUSSION: Participants found telehealth delivery acceptable, as indicated by the similarity between groups in the quantitative process measures, and as reported in interviews. Some reported a preference for in-person delivery if there had been a choice of delivery mode. Participants described characteristics of the two delivery modes which were relevant to their attitudes towards telehealth.

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing online versus face-to-face delivery of an aphasia communication partner training program for student healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Training conversation partners of people with aphasia who use facilitative communication strategies is one method that can improve access to healthcare for people with aphasia. However, the efficacy of communication partner training (CPT) has been investigated almost exclusively in the context of face-to-face (F2F) delivery. Online training may offer more cost-effective and accessible options to a wider range of conversation partners, including student healthcare professionals. AIMS: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial with student healthcare professionals comparing (1) an online aphasia CPT program, (2) a F2F CPT program and (3) no program (control group) on outcomes relating to attitudes and knowledge of aphasia. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A 45-min introductory aphasia CPT program was developed using the theories and techniques of Supported Conversations for Adults with Aphasia (SCA)™. A total of 30 first-year undergraduates studying occupational therapy at The University of Sydney were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: online CPT delivery, F2F delivery or delayed training control (no program). Outcomes measures included pre-post-testing with the Aphasia Attitudes, Strategies and Knowledge (AASK) survey. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A significant difference existed for the AASK survey pre-post-change scores between the online, F2F and control groups (χ2 (2) = 20.038, p = 0.000). Post-hoc analysis revealed that, compared with the control (Ctrl) group, participants in both the online and F2F groups had significantly higher knowledge of aphasia (Online versus Ctrl: p = 0.000; F2F versus control: p = 0.002), knowledge of facilitative strategies (Online versus Ctrl: p = 0.000; F2F versus Ctrl: p = 0.002), and positive attitudes towards aphasia (Online versus Ctrl: p = 0.031; F2F versus Ctrl: p = 0.032). No significant difference was observed between the online and F2F groups for the Total or any subtotals (p = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results from this pilot randomized controlled trial indicate that online delivery of the 45-min introductory CPT is equally as efficacious as F2F delivery, and thus may be a viable mode of delivery for future aphasia CPT programs. These pilot results pave the way for a larger study that will comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of an online aphasia CPT program for improving attitudes, knowledge and skills in a broad range of student healthcare professionals. What this paper adds What is already known on this subject The efficacy of F2F CPT for aphasia is well established. Online delivery of CPT programs may offer more cost-effective and accessible services when compared with F2F approaches; however, there is a need to explore the efficacy of online programs. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The 45-min online aphasia CPT program was found to be efficacious for improving student healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards aphasia and communication, and produced equally successful outcomes when compared with F2F delivery. This is the first study to report the efficacy of an online CPT program that is aligned with SCA for use with student healthcare professionals that also uses a self-report outcome measure with validated psychometric properties. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Online CPT programs may be useful in both clinical and education contexts to support improved efficiency of services and to enhance communication environments for people with aphasia in healthcare contexts.

Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery.

Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of social communication skills training (TBIconneCT) for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their communication partners, delivered in-person or via telehealth, on quality of conversations. Method This study is a clinical trial, including an in-person intervention group (n = 17), a telehealth intervention group (n = 19), and a historical control group (n = 15). Participants were adults at least 6 months post moderate-to-severe TBI with social communication skills deficits and their usual communication partners. Participants completed a casual and purposeful conversation task at pre-intervention, postintervention, and a follow-up assessment. A blinded assessor evaluated conversations using the Adapted Measure of Participation in Conversation and the Adapted Measure of Support in Conversation. Treatment effects were examined by comparing groups on change in ratings between pre- and posttraining. Maintenance of effects was examined using change between posttraining and follow-up assessment. The trial protocol was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001024538). Results Trained participants with TBI had significant improvements in participation in casual conversation compared to controls. Trained communication partners also had significant improvements compared to controls on ratings of support in casual conversations. However, treatment effects were not maintained at follow-up for two of eight measures. Comparisons between outcomes of in-person and telehealth groups found negligible to small effect sizes for six of eight measures. Conclusions The findings reinforce previous studies demonstrating the efficacy of communication partner training after TBI. Telehealth delivery produced similar outcomes to in-person delivery.

A Clinical Trial Investigating Telehealth and In-Person Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Participant-Reported Communication Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of telehealth-based and in-person social communication skills training (TBIconneCT) for people with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on outcomes reported by the survivor and a close communication partner. SETTING: Australia. Two telehealth dyads were located outside Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 51) at least 6 months after moderate-severe TBI with social communication skills deficits, and their usual communication partners (family members, friends, or paid carers). DESIGN: Partially randomized controlled trial, with a telehealth intervention group, in-person intervention group, and a historical control group. MAIN MEASURES: La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ) (total score, and number of items with perceived positive change). Both self- and other-reports. RESULTS: Trained participants had significantly more items with perceived positive change than did historical controls. A medium effect size in the sample was observed for improvements in total score reported by trained communication partners after treatment. Comparisons between telehealth and in-person groups found medium to large effect sizes in the sample, favoring the telehealth group on some LCQ variables. CONCLUSIONS: Whether delivered via telehealth or in-person, social communication skills training led to perceived positive change in communication skills. It was unexpected that outcomes for the telehealth group were better than for the in-person group on some variables.

Experiences of people with severe aphasia and spouses attending an Interdisciplinary Community Aphasia Group.

Background: Community aphasia groups are recognized as an area of need and value for people with chronic aphasia and their significant others. However, our understanding of attendees' experiences is limited by the small amount of qualitative research available. The present study aimed to describe participant experiences of an Interdisciplinary Community Aphasia Group, as part of a better understanding of its underlying processes and value.Methods: Four people with chronic, severe aphasia and their spouses attended an Interdisciplinary Community Aphasia Group held at a university speech clinic for 2 h once weekly over 12 weeks. The group was co-facilitated by a speech-language pathologist and a social worker, with the support of two aides (one a person with aphasia, and the other a member of the general community). The group addressed the following areas: communication therapy, conversation, participation in meaningful and accessible activities, psychological and social support, and aphasia information and education. Following the program, the people with aphasia (via multimodal communication) and spouses participated in separate semi-structured interviews with an independent interviewer. The interviews addressed members' perceptions of the program (both in relation to themselves and their spouse) along with recommendations for improvement. The interviews were analyzed using Framework Analysis.Results: Members shared preferences for program activities and group format, with some experiences leading to suggestions for improvement. The group dynamics and environment were considered positive overall, and members highlighted a range of positive impacts for both themselves and their spouse. Together, these elements informed members' evaluation that the model contained something for everyone, but may not be a "one-stop shop" given ongoing needs for therapy. An overarching theme for spouses addresses therapy and recovery in relation to the impact of peers, views and beliefs, and adjustment.Conclusions: The Interdisciplinary Community Aphasia Group model has overall acceptability for people with chronic, severe aphasia and their spouses, and can be adapted to ensure feasibility in clinical practice. Ongoing research is required to best tailor community groups for people with aphasia and significant others, and to reinforce the need for their proliferation.Implications for rehabilitationPeople with aphasia and their spouses can benefit from a wide range of programming, including participation in meaningful and accessible non-verbal activitiesAn interdisciplinary staff team can contribute positively to member experience and impacts, with peer staff offering valuable mentoring roles. Various aspects of member identity and life narrative impact on community aphasia group participation; understanding members' needs in the context of previous experiences can improve tailoring of program content.

Practices and challenges in community aphasia groups in Australia: Results of a national survey.

PURPOSE: This study reports on practices and challenges in developing community aphasia groups in Australia. METHOD: A 24-item web-based survey addressed the structure of existing community aphasia groups, funding models, group activities, facilitator satisfaction, challenges to group development and maintenance and suggestions for improvement. A total of 156 surveys were completed, mostly by speech-language pathologists (SLPs), with 66% urban and 34% regional/rural/remote participants representing all Australian states/territories consistent with their populations. RESULT: Seventy respondents indicated running a total of 86 groups, reflecting a substantial under-representation of service in proportion to the population of people with aphasia. Further, 23.6% of respondents reported dissatisfaction with aspects of their groups. The primary barriers to achieving satisfaction relate to limited resources and staffing, inability to run sufficient numbers of groups and to tailor them effectively, dispersed populations beyond major cities, group dynamics and a lack of group promotion and referral to groups. Respondents suggested means for improvement including changes to group structure, improved SLP training, dedicated funding and staffing, development of specific resources and better liaison and promotion. CONCLUSION: The major features differentiating the community aphasia groups run in Australia from those running overseas are discussed and practical ways to achieve service improvement are suggested.