Cardiac Safety of Osimertinib: A Review of Data.

PURPOSE: Osimertinib is a third-generation, CNS-active, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. We assess the cardiac failure risk in patients receiving osimertinib by evaluating the available data. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of cardiac data from (1) studies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, FLAURA (osimertinib, n = 279; comparator EGFR-TKI, n = 277) and AURA3 (osimertinib, n = 279; chemotherapy, n = 140), and (2) a pooled data set of patients treated with osimertinib 80 mg from across the clinical trial program (n = 1,142), including cardiac failure-related adverse events and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reductions. An LVEF pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic analysis of the pooled data set was performed. The sponsor's global safety database was analyzed for cardiac failure-related adverse events, and a literature search was conducted. RESULTS: Decreases in LVEF from a baseline of ≥ 10 percentage points to an absolute value of < 50% following osimertinib treatment were observed in 8 (3.1%) and 14 (5.5%) patients in FLAURA and AURA3, respectively, and in 35 (3.9%) patients in the pooled population. Most events were asymptomatic and resolved without treatment of the event or osimertinib discontinuation. The pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic analysis did not indicate a relationship between exposure to osimertinib and decreases in LVEF from baseline. The database and literature search showed no specific trend or pattern that was suggestive of a safety issue in patients receiving osimertinib. CONCLUSION: These data do not suggest a causal relationship between osimertinib and cardiac failure. However, because of LVEF decreases that were observed in patients with cardiac risk factors before osimertinib treatment, cardiac monitoring, including an assessment of LVEF at baseline and during osimertinib treatment, is advised.

Potential Procedural Efficiencies and Challenges of Combining Multiple Type II Variations into a Single EU-RMP.

The process for amending a European Union Risk Management Plan (EU-RMP) with new information requires the submission of a formal variation procedure, of which there are four distinct categories: Type IA, Type IB, Type II, and 'Extension of a marketing authorisation' (or simply 'extension'). A Type II variation, in accordance with the above-referenced European Commission regulation, is defined as 'a variation that is not an extension of the marketing authorisation (line extension) and that may have a significant impact on the quality, safety or efficacy of a medicinal product'. Additional detail regarding which type of variation should be submitted in specific circumstances is provided in the accompanying guideline. Common working practice for submission strategies when managing multiple Type II variations has been to either submit each in sequence or submit several parallel procedures each with its own corresponding EU-RMP. Submitting in sequence results in a prolonged, end-to-end process with each procedure resulting in a new, iterative version of the EU-RMP. Alternatively, submitting multiple parallel variations with their own corresponding EU-RMPs can result in very complicated procedural wrap-up activities and very short-lived approved versions. In this article, we describe an approach to the management of multiple Type II variations, which is now in line with the recently revised European Medicines Agency (EMA) frequently asked questions (FAQ) guidance on how to manage grouped Type II variation applications, whereby four parallel Type II variation procedures were successfully initiated simultaneously with a single EU-RMP.

Formulation of a microparticle carrier for oral polyplex-based DNA vaccines.

Oral induction of a disseminated mucosal immune response with polyplex-based DNA vaccines requires the delivery of intact polyplexes (polyelectrolyte complexes formed by self-assembly of plasmid DNA with a cationic polymer) to subepithelial lymphoid tissue (e.g. Peyer's patches) within the gastrointestinal tract. This work describes the formulation of a microparticle polyplex carrier allowing the potential of this approach to be realised. PEGylated PEI/DNA polyplexes (DNA concentration 20 microg/ml) formed at N/P 5:0 (defined as the ratio of polycation amino groups to DNA phosphates) were stable to salt-induced aggregation and could be concentrated to a final DNA concentration of 1 mg/ml without polyplex size increase. Polyplexes containing 1:1 polyethylene glycol (PEG)/polyethylenimine (PEI) ratio (mass/mass) gave similar levels of luciferase gene expression in B16F10 cells compared to non-PEG complexes. Poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microparticles containing PEGylated polyplexes (approximately 17% DNA encapsulation efficiency) were formulated using a modified double emulsion solvent evaporation method. The microencapsulation and release of intact polyplexes from the microparticle carrier was demonstrated using polyanion (heparin sulfate and poly(aspartic acid) (PAA)) displacement techniques and electron microscopy. Microparticles containing PEGylated polyplexes (24 microg beta-galactosidase DNA) were given orally to Wistar rats. Significant transgene expression (compared to background) was found in peripheral tissue (spleen) 72 h after administration. This work demonstrates the potential application of microparticle carriers for mucosal polyplex-based vaccination.

Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.

The dose of a drug is a major determinant of its safety, and establishing a safe dose of a novel drug is a prime objective during clinical development. The design of pre-marketing clinical trials precludes the representation of important subpopulations such as children, the elderly and people with co-morbidities. Therefore, postmarketing surveillance (PMS) activities are required to monitor the safety profile of drugs in real clinical practice. Furthermore, individual variations in pharmacogenetic profiles, the immune system, drug metabolic pathways and drug-drug interactions are also important factors in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Thus, the safety of a drug is a major clinical consideration before and after it is marketed. A multidisciplinary approach is required to enhance the safety profile of drugs at all stages of development, including PMS activities. Clinical pharmacology encompasses a range of disciplines and forms the backbone of drug safety consideration during clinical drug development. In this review we give an overview of the clinical drug development process and consider its limitations. We present a discussion of several aspects of clinical pharmacology and their application to enhancing drug safety. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling provides a method of predicting a clinically safe dose; consideration of drug pharmacokinetics in special populations may enhance safe therapeutics in a wider spectrum of patients, while pharmacogenetics provides the possibility of genotype-specific therapeutics. Pharmacovigilance activities are also discussed. Given the complex nature and unpredictability of type B reactions, PMS activities are crucial in managing the risks drugs pose to the general population. The various aspects of clinical pharmacology discussed make a strong case for this field as the backbone of optimising and promoting safe development and use of drugs.