Excessive responsibility in obsessional concerns: a fine-grained experimental analysis.

Excessive responsibility has been suggested as a central cognitive variable associated with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (Rachman, 1993, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149-154; Salkovskis, 1985, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571-583; Salkovskis, 1989, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 677-682; Salkovskis, 1995, Current controversies in the anxiety disorders). Several studies using questionnaires (e.g. Rhéaume, Freeston, Dugas, Letarte & Ladouceur, 1995, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 785-794) and experimental manipulations (Ladouceur et al., 1995, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 937-946; Lopatka & Rachman, 1995, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 673-684) have shown evidence for such a link between responsibility and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Responsibility has been defined as the belief of possessing a pivotal power to provoke or preventing crucial negative consequences (Salkovskis et al., 1992 cited in Salkovskis, 1995, Current controversies in the anxiety disorders). This definition emphasizes two related cognitive distortions: personal influence and potential negative consequences. The respective roles of each component and their potential interaction need to be clarified. The present study tests the effects of an experimental manipulation of both influence and negative consequences on perceived responsibility and checking behavior during a classification task. Seventy-seven subjects were divided into four experimental conditions: the Combined condition, the Influence condition, the Negative Consequences condition and the Control condition. After the experimental manipulation, subjects from each condition had to classify capsules in semi-transparent bottles. Results showed that personal influence is the best predictor of perceived responsibility. Although increased potential negative consequences were sufficient to trigger hesitations, combined influence and negative consequences were necessary to produce modifications. These results are consistent with the results obtained by the questionnaires (e.g. Rhéaume, Ladouceur, Freeston & Letarte, 1995a, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 159-169) and previous manipulations (e.g. Ladouceur et al., 1995).

Experimental manipulations of responsibility: an analogue test for models of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Several authors attribute excessive responsibility a predominant role in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) [Salkovskis, P. M. (1985) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571-583; Rachman, S. (1993) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149-154; van Oppen, P. & Arntz, A. (1994) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 79-87]. The present studies aimed at demonstrating the link between different levels of perceived responsibility and checking behaviors by experimentally manipulating responsibility in non-clinical Ss. In the first study, a sound recognition task was used to compare checking behaviors in Ss with high (HR) and low (LR) perceived responsibility. Only one variable was significantly different, Ss from the HR group reporting more anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Results did not support a link between responsibility and checking behavior. In a second study HR and LR Ss were compared on a manual classification task. Subjects from the HR group hesitated and checked more, and reported more preoccupation with errors and anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Since perceived severity of the outcome was the most variable affected by the manipulation, the implications for current models of OCD are discussed and an alternative explanation is attempted. Finally, clinical implications are examined and suggestions are made for future directions of research.