Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Gerontol ; 38(10): 1472-1491, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29165023

RESUMO

Currently available elder abuse screening and identification tools have limitations for use in long-term care (LTC). This mixed-methods study sought to explore the appropriateness of using the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index© (a suspicion tool originally created for use with older adults in the ambulatory setting with Mini-Mental State Examination scores ≥ 24) with similarly cognitively functioning persons residing in LTC. Results were informed by a literature review, Internet-based consultations with elder abuse experts across Canada (n = 19), and data obtained from two purposively selected focus groups (n = 7 local elder abuse experts; n = 7 experienced front-line LTC clinicians). Analyses resulted in the development of a nine-question tool, the EASI-ltc, designed to raise suspicion of EA in cognitively intact older adults residing in LTC (with little or no cognitive impairment). Notable modifications to the original Elder Abuse Suspicion Index© (EASI) included three new questions to further address neglect and psychological abuse, and a context-specific preamble to orient responders.


Assuntos
Abuso de Idosos/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Casas de Saúde
2.
J Psychosom Res ; 55(5): 437-43, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14581098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot/feasibility study was to describe the experience of women presenting with a suspicious mammogram who are waiting for a breast biopsy and to identify those at risk for distress. METHODS: Participants (n=25) were interviewed at two time points: immediately after being put on the waiting list (T1) and again immediately before their biopsy approximately 6 weeks later (T2). Self-report measures of distress and coping were used. Perceived personal risk of a positive biopsy finding and information needs were assessed through open-ended questions. RESULTS: Distress levels were high in this sample. Using cognitive-avoidant coping strategies, being employed, history of previous biopsies, and having a family history of breast cancer were associated with greater distress. Perceived personal risk of a positive biopsy finding was overestimated in one half of the cases and was correlated with greater distress. CONCLUSION: Waiting period between suspicious mammogram and breast biopsy may be a time of high distress for many women.


Assuntos
Biópsia/psicologia , Doenças Mamárias/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...