Combining tiotropium and salmeterol in COPD: Effects on airflow obstruction and symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Clinical information on 24-h spirometric efficacy of combining tiotropium and salmeterol compared to single-agent therapy is lacking in patients with COPD. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover study of 6-week treatment periods comparing combination therapy of tiotropium 18 microg plus qd or bid salmeterol 50 microg versus single-agent therapy. Serial 24-h spirometry (FEV(1), FVC), effects on dyspnea (TDI focal score) and rescue salbutamol use were evaluated in 95 patients. RESULTS: Tiotropium plus qd salmeterol was superior to tiotropium or salmeterol alone in average FEV(1) (0-24h) by 72 mL and 97 mL (p<0.0001), respectively. Compared to this qd regimen, combination therapy including bid salmeterol provided comparable daytime (0-12h: 12 mL, p=0.38) bronchodilator effects, but significantly more bronchodilation during the night-time (12-24h: 73 mL, p<0.0001). Clinically relevant improvements in TDI focal score were achieved with bronchodilator combinations including salmeterol qd or bid (2.56 and 2.71; p<0.005 versus components). Symptom benefit of combination therapies was also reflected in less need for reliever medication. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Compared to single-agent therapy, combination therapy of tiotropium plus salmeterol in COPD provided clinically meaningful improvements in airflow obstruction and dyspnea as well as a reduction in reliever medication.

The efficacy of tiotropium administered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler or HandiHaler in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium, a once daily inhaled anticholinergic delivered via HandiHaler, provides bronchodilation for >24h and improves patient-centred outcomes. The Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI), a novel, propellant-free inhaler, has been developed and proposed as an alternative delivery device for use with tiotropium. METHODS: In a pre-specified, pooled analysis of two 30-week, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover studies, 207 patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were randomised to receive once daily tiotropium 5 microg or 10 microg (aqueous solution delivered via Respimat SMI), tiotropium 18 microg (inhalation powder via HandiHaler) or placebo. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) response. Forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), rescue medication use, safety and pharmacokinetics (in a subgroup of patients) were also assessed. RESULTS: Both tiotropium doses delivered by Respimat SMI were significantly superior to placebo and non-inferior to tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler on the primary endpoint (all p<0.0001). All active treatments were significantly superior to placebo (all p<0.0001) and both doses of tiotropium Respimat SMI were non-inferior to tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler on the secondary spirometry variables and rescue medication use. The systemic exposure was similar between tiotropium 5 microg Respimat SMI and tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler but was higher for tiotropium 10 microg Respimat SMI. All active treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium 5 microg Respimat SMI is comparable with tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler in terms of efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety. Respimat SMI is an effective alternative, multi-dose delivery device for tiotropium.

Comparison of tiotropium once daily, formoterol twice daily and both combined once daily in patients with COPD.

This study compared the bronchodilator effects of tiotropium, formoterol and both combined in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 71 COPD patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 37% predicted) participated in a randomised, double-blind, three-way, crossover study and received tiotropium 18 microg q.d., formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. or both combined q.d. for three 6-week periods. The end-points were 24-h spirometry (FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of each treatment, rescue salbutamol and safety. Compared with baseline (FEV1 prior to the first dose in the first period), tiotropium produced a significantly greater improvement in average daytime FEV1 (0-12 h) than formoterol (127 versus 86 mL), while average night-time FEV1 (12-24 h) was not different (tiotropium 43 mL, formoterol 38 mL). The most pronounced effects were provided by combination therapy (daytime 234 mL, night-time 86 mL); both differed significantly from single-agent therapies. Changes in FVC mirrored the FEV1 results. Compared with both single agents, daytime salbutamol use was significantly lower during combination therapy (tiotropium plus formoterol 1.81 puffs.day(-1), tiotropium 2.41 puffs x day(-1), formoterol 2.37 puffs x day(-1)). All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, tiotropium q.d. achieved a greater improvement in daytime and comparable improvement in night-time lung function compared with formoterol b.i.d. A combination of both drugs q.d. was most effective and provided an additive effect throughout the 24-h dosing interval.