Osteoplastic Pterional Craniotomy: Success Rate of Surgery in Patient Aspect.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of osteoplastic pterional craniotomy on temporal hollowing and its sequelae. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 97 patients who underwent pterional craniotomy for an aneurysm were analyzed retrospectively. Of these 97 patients, 63 underwent surgery via the conventional pterional approach and 34 underwent surgery via the osteoplastic pterional approach. The temporal muscle volume was calculated bilaterally on CT images obtained in the sixth postoperative month. The results obtained in the conventional and osteoplastic approaches were compared. RESULTS: Of the 97 included patients, 45 were female and 52 were male. The mean patient age was 50.37 years. In the conventional group, 31 were female and 32 were male. In the osteoplastic group, 14 were female and 20 were male. The temporal muscle volume difference between the operated and non-operated side was not statistically significant in the osteoplastic group. However, the volume was slightly lesser on the operated side than on the non-operated side in the conventional group. CONCLUSION: The osteoplastic pterional approach is superior to the conventional approach in preserving the muscle volume and function. Patients who underwent osteoplastic craniotomy demonstrated higher levels of satisfaction with their facial appearance compared to those who underwent craniotomy using the conventional pterional approach.

Peritumoural Oedema as a Predictor of Overall Survival for Patients with Posterior Fossa Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relationship between peritumoural oedema volume and tumour volume in relation to the impact of metastatic posterior fossa tumour survival rates. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from 2011-2021. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-six cancer patients who had been operated upon for cerebellar metastases were analysed retrospectively. To investigate the effect of oedema on survival, patients with a single cerebellar metastasis were evaluated retrospectively. Those patients had a single metastasis located in the cerebellum and did not receive radiotherapy or corticosteroids before surgery. OsiriX MD DICOM viewer was used to calculate the volumes of the tumour and the oedema using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients were separated into two groups, and the cut-off limit for the oedema to-tumour ratio was set to two. Survival analysis was performed on the two groups. RESULTS: When the primary sites of the tumours were evaluated, 60.7% were located in the lungs (n = 34), 10.7% were located in the breasts (n = 6), 10.7% were located in the gastrointestinal tract (n = 6), 7.1% were located in the renal region (n = 4), 5.4% were located in the gynaecologic tract (n = 3), and 5.4% were located in other parts of the body (n = 3). A univariate analysis showed that overall survival duration was significantly longer in the subgroup with breast cancer (83.3%) and in those patients with a peritumoural oedema volume to tumour volume ratio of less than two (27.6%, p <0.05). Negative prognostic factors were lung cancer and high peritumoural oedema volume. CONCLUSION: Significant peritumoural oedema was linked to a poor prognosis for cancer patients with a single cerebellar metastasis, especially with lung cancer as the primary source. KEY WORDS: Cerebellar metastases, Cerebellum, OsiriX MD, Tumour volume.

Comparison of clinical and radiological results of dynamic and rigid instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Objective: Lumbar spinal stenosis is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by neurogenic claudication or radicular pain due to the narrowing of the spinal canal or neural foramen and the compression of its neural elements. Surgical treatment is applied to decompress the neural structures. In some cases, transpedicular instrumentation and fusion may also be applied. In this study, we aimed to investigate and compare the preoperative and postoperative, clinical and radiological aspects of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent lumbar instrumentation using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rod or a titanium rod. Materials and Methods: In this study, the files of 293 patients who underwent posterior lumbar transpedicular stabilization between January 2015 and February 2018 in the Neurosurgery Clinic of Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who did not meet the study criteria were excluded, and 127 patients who met the criteria and underwent posterior lumbar transpedicular stabilization due to lumbar spinal stenosis and/or lumbar degenerative disc disease were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups, dynamic and rigid, according to the rod types used. The two groups were compared using various postoperative clinical and radiological parameters. Results: The demographic data, surgical data, Visual Analog Scale-Oswestry Disability Index (VAS-ODI) data, and radiological data of both groups were carefully examined. There were 63 patients in the rigid group and 64 patients in the dynamic group. The age range in both groups was from 30 to 78 years, with a mean age of 56.44 years; 99 of the cases were female and 28 were male. The analysis of the participants' demographic data showed no significant differences between the two groups. Compared with the preoperative data, the postoperative evaluations revealed a significant decrease in VAS and ODI, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of duration of surgery, follow-up time, operating distances, hospitalization duration, pseudoarthrosis, or fusion. Regarding the total and segmental range of motion, the affection was less in the dynamic group, which allowed for more movement. While there was no difference in disc height index between the two preoperative groups, it was observed that it was better maintained in the rigid group in the postoperative long term. Regarding foraminal height (FH), there was no difference between the two groups in the preoperative and early postoperative periods, but in the long term, FH was better maintained in the dynamic group. The long-term follow-ups revealed that adjacent segment disease (ASD) had developed in 19 patients in the rigid group, whereas ASD developed in only nine patients in the dynamic group. Based on these results, the probability of developing significant ASD in the rigid group was higher. Conclusion: Previous experience with PEEK rod systems has demonstrated physiological spine movement, increased fusion rates, minimal complications, reduction in adjacent segment degeneration, and biomechanical compatibility. Although further long-term studies are needed and the cost of PEEK systems is likely to be a barrier, the results of the present study support the use of PEEK rods and other dynamic systems in spinal surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Arachnoid Cysts: Cyst Excision or Fenestration?

AIM: Arachnoid cysts in the spinal canal account for 1%-3% of all spinal canal lesions. There is no consensus on surgical treatment yet. Dural defect repair is crucial in surgical treatment patients with an extradural component. Fenestration or total resection of the spinal arachnoid cyst is among the preferred methods. This study aimed to examine a series of surgically treated spinal arachnoid cysts in light of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients treated in the Istanbul Umraniye Training and Research Hospital Neurosurgery Clinic. A total of 18 patients with spinal arachnoid cysts underwent surgical treatment between 2012 and 2021. All patients were assessed before and after surgery for muscle strength, pain, sensory changes, and bowel-bladder symptoms. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Among the 18 patients, 8 were men and 10 were women, with a mean age of 43.7 (25-66) years. Congenital conditions were discovered in 15 of the patients, 2 after lumbar drainage and 1 after spinal anesthesia. Intradural extramedullary and intra-extradural cysts were found in 17 patients and 1 patient, respectively. The cyst was smaller than level 3 in 14 patients and greater than level 3 in 4 patients. Cyst excision and cyst fenestration were performed in 11 and 7 patients, respectively. Cyst excision was performed in four of the patients who underwent cyst fenestration because their complaints did not improve. CONCLUSION: Surgery should be considered in patients with symptomatic spinal arachnoid cysts. Fenestration may be a suitable alternative, especially if magnetic resonance imaging reveals no intracystic adhesion or trabeculation. Residual and recurrence rates are high in patients with a history of intradural intervention, adhesions, or trabeculation. When there is trabeculation, the best option is cyst removal.

Can Posterior Midline Approach Provide Adequate Exposure for All Craniovertebral Junction Tumors?

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) lesions remains a difficult process requiring advanced experience. The aim of this study was to present our experience and the clinical results of a posterior and posterolateral approach used for CVJ lesions in our clinic, and to discuss these in light of current literature. METHODS: Clinical, radiologic, and surgical aspects of 30 patients with CVJ tumors were retrospectively evaluated. Age, sex, symptoms, tumor localizations, pre- and postoperative neurologic examinations, performed surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and tumor pathologies were analyzed. The modified McCormick classification was used in the evaluation of the neurologic examination. RESULTS: There were 30 patients (12 men, 18 women; mean age: 41.8 years). Hemilaminectomy was performed in 14 cases, and total laminectomy or laminoplasty in 16 cases; additional suboccipital craniectomy was performed in 6. Postoperative mortality was observed in 1 (3.3%) patient in the early postoperative period following tetraparesis, motor deficit in 2 (6.6%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 (6.6%), and wound site infection in 1 (3.3%). A tumor rest was detected in 2 patients (6.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A posterior or a posterolateral approach is a safe surgical technique that can provide total tumor resection for CVJ region lesions, including posterior, posterolateral, lateral, and anterolaterally located tumors. Isolated anterior and anterolateral tumors with small lateral extension may require a far lateral or extreme lateral approach combined with other cranial base techniques.