Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(3): 643-648, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36658785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients referred to public orthopaedic clinics can experience long waiting times before assessment. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative Shoulder/Elbow Triage and Assessment (SHELTA) model of care involving orthopaedic surgeons and physiotherapists to reduce the waitlist and improve service and clinical outcomes for patients on an orthopaedic shoulder/elbow clinic waitlist. METHODS: Patients on the waitlist were triaged by surgeons and physiotherapists and invited to an assessment by experienced physiotherapists. Patients were treated nonoperatively or transferred to orthopaedic management based on clinical discussion. The primary outcome was the number of patients on the waitlist. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, patient satisfaction, re-referral and conversion to surgery rates. Pain, function and patient global impression of change were recorded for participants managed nonoperatively. RESULTS: From July 2019 to December 2019, the waitlist reduced from 451 to 298 patients with no adverse events. Seventy-nine patients could not be contacted and 25 no longer required assessment, and were removed from the waitlist. Nonoperatively managed participants reported satisfaction with the service, a median score of 6 on a 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change scale, change in pain of -2.5/10 (95% CI -3.3, -1.7; P < 0.001) on a numerical pain rating scale, and change in function of -17.4/100 (95% CI: -24.1, -10.8; P < 0.001) on the QuickDASH, indicating improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The SHELTA model of care effectively reduced the number of patients on an orthopaedic shoulder/elbow clinic waitlist with good service and clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Ortopedia , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Ombro , Cotovelo , Triagem , Listas de Espera , Dor
2.
J Physiother ; 63(3): 161-167, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28662834

RESUMO

QUESTION: Do people with musculoskeletal conditions better adhere to their home exercise programs when these are provided to them on an app with remote support compared to paper handouts? DESIGN: Randomised, parallel-group trial with intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty participants with upper or lower limb musculoskeletal conditions were recruited to the trial. Each participant was prescribed a 4-week home exercise program by a physiotherapist at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Participants were randomly assigned via a computer-generated concealed block randomisation procedure to either intervention (n=40) or control (n=40) groups. INTERVENTION: Participants in the intervention group received their home exercise programs on an app linked to the freely available website www.physiotherapyexercises.com. They also received supplementary phone calls and motivational text messages. Participants in the control group received their home exercise programs as a paper handout. OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded assessors collected outcome measures at baseline and 4 weeks. The primary outcome was self-reported exercise adherence. There were five secondary outcomes, which captured functional performance, disability, patient satisfaction, perceptions of treatment effectiveness, and different aspects of adherence. RESULTS: Outcomes were available on 77 participants. The mean between-group difference for self-reported exercise adherence at 4 weeks was 1.3/11 points (95% CI 0.2 to 2.3), favouring the intervention group. The mean between-group difference for function was 0.9/11 points (95% CI 0.1 to 1.7) on the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, also favouring the intervention group. There were no significant between-group differences for the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSION: People with musculoskeletal conditions adhere better to their home exercise programs when the programs are provided on an app with remote support compared to paper handouts; however, the clinical importance of this added adherence is unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616000066482. [Lambert TE, Harvey LA, Avdalis C, Chen LW, Jeyalingam S, Pratt CA, Tatum HJ, Bowden JL, Lucas BR (2017) An app with remote support achieves better adherence to home exercise programs than paper handouts in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 63: 161-167].


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Aplicativos Móveis , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Cooperação do Paciente , Autocuidado , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...