Evaluation of the Profile and Mechanism of Neurotoxicity of Water-Soluble [Cu(P)4]PF6 and [Au(P)4]PF6 (P = thp or PTA) Anticancer Complexes.

[Cu(thp)4]PF6, [Cu(PTA)4]PF6, [Au(thp)4]PF6 and [Au(PTA)4]PF6 are phosphane (thp = tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphane; PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) copper(I) and gold(I) water-soluble complexes characterized by high anticancer activity in a wide range of solid tumors, often able to overcome drug resistance of platinum-based compounds. For these reasons, they have been proposed as a valid alternative to platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., cisplatin and oxaliplatin). In vitro experiments performed on organotypic cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) from 15-day-old rat embryos revealed that copper-based compounds were not neurotoxic even at concentrations higher than the IC50 obtained in human cancer cells while [Au(PTA)4]PF6 was neurotoxic at lower concentration than IC50 in cancer cell lines. The ability of these compounds to hinder the proteasome machinery in DRG neurons was tested by fluorimetric assay showing that the non-neurotoxic copper-based complexes do not inhibit proteasome activity in DRG primary neuron cultures. On the contrary, the neurotoxic complex [Au(PTA)4]PF6, induced a significant inhibition of proteasome activity even at concentrations lower than the IC50 in cancer cells. The proteasome inhibition induced by [Au(PTA)4]PF6 was associated with a significant increase in α-tubulin polymerization that was not observed following the treatment with copper-based compounds. Uptake experiments performed by atomic absorption spectrometry showed that both copper-based complexes and [Au(PTA)4]PF6 are internalized in neuron cultures. In vitro and in vivo preliminary data confirmed copper-based complexes as the most promising compounds, not only for their anticancer activity but also concerning the peripheral neurotoxicity profile.

In vivo comparative study of the cytotoxicity of a liposomal formulation of cisplatin (lipoplatin™).

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is one of the most effective cytotoxic agents in the treatment of solid malignancies, but its use is limited by several side effects. Among them, peripheral neurotoxicity can be dose limiting. A liposomal formulation of cisplatin, Lipoplatin™, was developed to reduce the systemic toxicity of cisplatin but without preventing its efficacy. The aim of this study was to use an animal model to establish, through a multimodal approach, whether chronic treatment with two different schedules of Lipoplatin™, selected within the range of its anticancer effective dose, is less neurotoxic than cisplatin administration. METHODS: Female Wistar rats were treated intraperitoneally with cisplatin at a dose of 4 mg/kg or with Lipoplatin™ at doses delivering 12 or 24 mg/kg of cisplatin once weekly for 4 weeks. General toxicity was assessed by daily observation, body weight change, hematological and blood chemistry analysis, and histopathology of liver and kidney. The onset of peripheral neurotoxicity was assessed by measuring tail nerve conduction velocity (NCV), morphological and morphometric analysis of dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and morphological analysis of the sciatic nerve. RESULTS: Cisplatin induced a statistically significant reduction in body weight, the development of renal failure, and impairment in NCV with pathological alterations in the DRG and sciatic nerve. By contrast, Lipoplatin™ was markedly less nephrotoxic, and no significant weight gain reduction was observed in animals treated with both doses of the drug. Moreover, the lowest dose induced less severe damage to the peripheral nervous system with a moderate decrease in NCV and mild pathological alterations in DRG and the sciatic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Lipoplatin™ 12 mg/kg is less neurotoxic than cisplatin 4 mg/kg, thus opening up the possibility of using this new formulation in future studies where its anticancer activity and the peripheral neurotoxicity will be assessed in parallel.

Regression of diabetic complications by islet transplantation in the rat.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes is a chronic disease leading to complications such as peripheral neuropathies, nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. Pancreatic islet transplantation is being extensively investigated for blood glucose control in animals and in human type 1 diabetic patients, but the question of whether it can reverse long-term diabetic complications has not been fully explored. We investigated the effects of islet transplantation on diabetic complications in a rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes. METHODS: Three groups of rats were used: healthy controls, diabetic and diabetic rats transplanted with microencapsulated islets at 2 months after diabetes induction, when neuropathy was detectable by a decrease in tail nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and impaired nociceptive thresholds. Blood glucose levels and body weight were measured weekly. The variables considered were: thermal (hot plate test) and mechanical sensitivity (Randal-Selitto paw withdrawal test), NCV and Na+, K+-ATPase activity in the sciatic nerve. At the end of the experiments hearts were removed for morphometric determination and myocyte number, and kidneys removed for histological examination. RESULTS: Islet transplantation in diabetic rats induced normoglycaemia in a few days, accompanied by a rapid rise in body weight and amelioration of impaired nociceptive thresholds, as well as normalisation of NCV and Na(+), K(+)-ATPase, which were both about 25% below normal in diabetic rats. Myocyte loss was reduced (-34%) by islet transplantation and the observed mild kidney damage of diabetic rats was prevented. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Besides controlling glycaemia, transplantation of microencapsulated pancreatic islets induced almost complete regression of neuropathy and prevented cardiovascular alterations.