Resilience and Value: Pediatric Trauma Care in Safety Net Hospitals.

Background: In the setting of limited funding and high expectations for quality care, safety net hospitals play a crucial role in treating pediatric trauma patients. This study aimed to compare outcomes and hospitalization costs of pediatric trauma patients in safety net hospitals across the United States. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2016-2020 was queried for all patients under the age of 18 years hospitalized for traumatic injury. Patients admitted to safety net hospitals were propensity matched 1:1 to all other patients. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes were readmission within 1-year, mean length of stay (LOS), total charges, and total hospitalization costs including readmissions. Results: There were 176,325 patients meeting inclusion criteria, and 30,869 were admitted to safety net hospitals. All safety net patients were successfully matched across predictors, and 61,738 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 1.4% (n = 834), and the mortality risk was similar in safety net hospitals (OR 1.11 [.96-1.27] P = .15). The overall readmission rate, mean LOS, and mean total cost were similar for safety net hospitals when compared to all hospitals. However, the overall mean total charge was $78,724 (±$224,884) and was lower in safety net hospitals ($76,575 [±$198,342], P = .02). Discussion: Safety net hospitals deliver comparable outcomes as other health care facilities when caring for pediatric trauma patients. Notably, these hospitals appear to undercharge for their services, despite incurring similar costs in the process. These results shed light on the resilience of safety net hospitals in delivering quality and cost-effective care.

Efficacy of Landmark-Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane (LTAP) Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery remains a challenge given the side effects of narcotics and the potential for abuse. While transversus abdominis plane block has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, such as decreased opioid consumption and pain scores among adult patients, there is limited data regarding its efficacy for pediatric patients. This study evaluates efficacy amongst pediatric patients undergoing landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) during laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients, ages 0-18 years old, who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis at a single institution from January 2021 to December 2022 was conducted. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Welch's t test were used to assess differences between the two cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results are statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients who met inclusion criteria, 40% (n = 36) underwent LTAP block. Those with LTAP block had a shorter average operative time than those without LTAP block (.6 vs .7 hours; P = .009). Similarly, patients with LTAP block had a shorter average time to discharge (4.1 vs 11.0 h; P = .039). There were no other statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes including narcotic use between both cohorts. DISCUSSION: Landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks did not increase operative times yet reduced time to discharge for pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between LTAP administration and postoperative narcotic consumption to make clinical recommendations.

Ovarian Salvage With Prompt Surgical Intervention for Adnexal Torsion: Does Timing Matter?

BACKGROUND: Adnexal torsion requires treatment to limit ischemic injury and tissue loss. Optimal time to surgical intervention has not been established. We compared outcomes of ovarian loss amongst pediatric patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 88 patients with adnexal torsion from March 2014 through April 2021. Rates of ovarian loss were compared for patients who underwent surgery within and beyond 60 minutes from diagnosis. RESULTS: Most patients underwent surgery more than 60 minutes from the time of diagnosis (83%; median time 116 minutes). Comparing patients with and without ovarian loss, there was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery from time of diagnosis (P = .618). Patients with ovarian loss had a longer duration of symptoms (24 vs 96 hours; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: While surgical repair of adnexal torsion may be urgent, this study suggests that duration of symptoms should be considered when assessing a patient's likelihood of ovarian loss.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach on Attainment of a Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Review of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure realized when all desired short-term quality metrics are met following an oncologic operation. This study examined whether minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) is associated with increased likelihood of TOO attainment. METHODS: The 2010-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. Surgical approach was described as open (OG), laparoscopic (LG), or robotic (RG). TOO was defined as having met five metrics: R0 resection, AJCC compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 15), no prolonged length of stay (< 75th percentile by year), no 30-day readmission, and receipt of guideline-accordant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 21,015 patients identified, 5708 (27.2%) underwent MIG (LG = 21.9%, RG = 5.3%). Patients who underwent RG were more likely to have met all TOO criteria, and consequently TOO. Logistic regression models revealed that patients undergoing MIG were significantly more likely to attain TOO. MIG was associated with a higher likelihood of adequate LAD, no prolonged LOS, and concordant chemotherapy. Patients who underwent LG and achieved TOO had the highest median OS (86.7 months), while the OG non-TOO cohort experienced the lowest (34.6 months). The median OS for the RG TOO group was not estimable; however, the mortality rate (.7%) was the lowest of the six cohorts. CONCLUSION: RG resulted in a significantly increased likelihood of TOO attainment. Although TOO is associated with increased OS across all surgical approaches, attainment of TOO following MIG is associated with a statistically significantly higher median OS.

Social determinants of health in pediatric trauma: Associations with injury mechanisms and outcomes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Relationships between social determinants of health and pediatric trauma mechanisms and outcomes are unclear in context of COVID-19. METHODS: Children <16 years old injured between 2016 and 2021 from ten pediatric trauma centers in Florida were included. Patients were stratified by high vs. low Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Injury mechanisms studied were child abuse, ATV/golf carts, and firearms. Mechanism incidence trends and mortality were evaluated by interrupted time series and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 19,319 children, 68% and 32% had high and low SVI, respectively. Child abuse increased across SVI strata and did not change with COVID. ATV/golf cart injuries increased after COVID among children with low SVI. Firearm injuries increased after COVID among children with high SVI. Mortality was predicted by injury mechanism, but was not independently associated with SVI, race, or COVID. CONCLUSION: Social vulnerability influences pediatric trauma mechanisms and COVID effects. Child abuse and firearm injuries should be targeted for prevention.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: post-operative bile and chyle leaks. A case report.

One week after an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at an outside hospital, a 56-year-old male presented to the emergency department with right-sided abdominal pain. Computerized tomography (CT) revealed a complex fluid collection in the gallbladder fossa. The patient underwent drain placement and received broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Drain output was suspicious for a chyle leak, which was confirmed by elevated fluid triglyceride levels. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) analysis showed evidence of a concurrent bile leak. After starting a low fat, high protein diet and octreotide, a common bile duct sphincterotomy with plastic stent placement was performed. The patient's symptoms and drain output proceeded to improve. The cause of the chyle leak is unclear. However, with consideration of the patient's concurrent bile leak, an injury to the right major lymphatic drainage pathway and adjacent bile duct is suspected.

Financial Toxicity in Emergency General Surgery: Novel Propensity-Matched Outcome Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity describes the harmful effect of individual treatment costs and fiscal burdens that have a compounding negative impact on outcomes in surgery. While this phenomenon has been widely studied in surgical oncology, the purpose of this study was to perform a novel exploration of the impact of financial toxicity in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients throughout the US. STUDY DESIGN: The Nationwide Readmissions Database for January and February 2018 was queried for all EGS patients aged 18 to 65 years. One-to-one propensity matching was performed with and without risk for financial toxicity. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE), prolonged length of stay (LOS), and readmission within 30 days. RESULTS: There were 24,154 EGS patients propensity matched. The mortality rate was 0.2% (n = 39), and the rate of VTE was 0.5% (n = 113). With financial toxicity, there was no statistically significant difference for mortality (p = 0.08) or VTE (p = 0.30). The rate of prolonged LOS was 6.2% (n = 824), and the risk was increased with financial toxicity (risk ratio 1.24 [1.12 to 1.37]; p < 0.001). The readmission rate was 7.0% (n = 926), and the risk with financial toxicity was increased (risk ratio 1.21 [1.10 to 1.33]; p < 0.001). The mean count of comorbidities per patient per admission during readmission within 1 year with financial toxicity was 2.1 ± 1.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.7 without (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite little difference in the rate of mortality or VTE, EGS patients at risk for financial toxicity have an increased risk of readmission and longer LOS. Fewer comorbidities were identified at index admission than during readmission in patients at risk for financial toxicity. Future studies aimed at reducing this compounding effect of financial toxicity and identifying missed comorbidities have the potential to improve EGS outcomes.

Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure realized when all desired short-term quality metrics are met after an oncologic operation. This study examined the incidence and impact of achieving a TOO among patients undergoing resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. Textbook oncologic outcome was defined as having met five metrics: R0 resection, American Joint Committee on Cancer-compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 15), no prolonged hospital stay (< 75th percentile by year), no 30-day readmission, and receipt of guideline-accordant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 34,688 patients identified, 8249 (23.8 %) achieved TOO. The patients for whom TOO was achieved were more likely to have traveled farther (p < 0.001) and received care in an academic (p < 0.001) or very high case-volume facility (p < 0.001). The TOO group had a significanty higher median overall survival (OS) than the non-TOO group (80.5 vs 35.3 months; p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that at 12 months, the survival probability estimate was 92 % for the TOO group versus 77 % for the non-TOO group. At 60 months (long-term survival), survival probability estimates remained higher for the TOO group (57 % vs 38 %). The results of the multivariate Cox regression model found that TOO attainment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.82; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TOO measure is associated with improved OS and reduced risk of death after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, in this study, TOO was obtained in only 23.8 % of cases.

A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers improved aesthetics without compromising oncologic safety. Subpectoral breast reconstruction has long been standard practice, although prepectoral reconstruction has recently resurged in popularity. Due to this recent paradigm shift, studies comparing long-term outcomes by reconstructive plane are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive NSMs with implant-based reconstruction in either the prepectoral or subpectoral plane from 2014 to 2018. Patient demographics, implant specifications, and operative details were collected to evaluate primary outcomes of prosthetic failure and unplanned reoperations by reconstructive plane. Secondary outcomes included animation deformity, capsular contracture, rippling, plane change, and minor revisions, including fat grafting. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 405 NSMs were performed on 228 women (subpectoral = 202, prepectoral = 203), with a mean follow-up of 2.1 years (standard deviation 1.1). During the study period (2014-2018), a shift from subpectoral to predominantly prepectoral mastectomies occurred in 2017. Prepectoral reconstructions were more often direct-to-implant (DTI) compared with subpectoral (73.9% vs. 33.2%, p < 0.001). Prepectoral reconstruction demonstrated significantly reduced prosthetic failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.65) and unplanned reoperations (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77) compared with subpectoral reconstruction after controlling for implant characteristics and other possible confounders. Prepectoral patients experienced decreased animation deformity overall (19.7% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), with plane changes seen in 10.6% of subpectoral reconstructions for animation deformity correction. Prepectoral patients experienced an increase in rippling (15.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.003) without a significant increase in fat grafting (subpectoral = 11.6% vs. prepectoral = 12.3%, p = 0.829). CONCLUSIONS: This single-institution experience compares late complications of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based reconstruction following NSM. Prepectoral reconstruction can be safely performed with improved understanding of mastectomy planes, readily affords DTI reconstruction, and reduces animation deformity at the expense of rippling.

Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is associated with improved aesthetics and oncologic safety. Recently, there has been a resurgence in prepectoral reconstruction. Because of limited data comparing complication rates on patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction, this study compared 30-day postoperative complications by plane of prosthetic placement. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all consecutive patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction with either prepectoral or subpectoral placement from 2014 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite, acute 30-day postoperative complication, including nipple-areola complex necrosis, mastectomy flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, hematoma, and seroma. Secondary outcomes included nipple loss and rates of unintended reoperations. Univariate and mixed effects multivariate logistic regression were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients and 405 breasts were included in the final cohort, with 202 in the subpectoral cohort and 203 in the prepectoral cohort. The overall complication rate was 7.65 percent, with no significant difference between subpectoral and prepectoral cohorts (9.41 percent versus 5.91 percent, respectively; p = 0.148). Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with significantly reduced ischemic complications, including nipple loss because of necrosis (2.97 percent versus 0.49 percent, respectively; p = 0.015) and mastectomy flap necrosis (5.45 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in rates of infection, hematoma, seroma, or implant loss/exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral reconstruction is associated with similar overall 30-day postoperative complications and reoperations compared to traditional subpectoral implants. However, prepectoral reconstruction was associated with significantly decreased ischemic complications, including mastectomy flap necrosis and nipple-areola complex loss because of necrosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.