On taking up space: a qualitative inquiry of depression in older adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the phenomenology of depression in older adults with cancer (OACs) in order to improve the accuracy of depression screening for this population. METHOD: Inclusion criteria were: ≥70 years old, history of cancer, no cognitive impairment or severe psychopathology. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, a diagnostic interview, and a qualitative interview. Using a Thematic Content Analysis framework, critical themes, passages, and phrases used by patients to describe their perceptions of depression and how it is experienced were identified. Particular attention was paid to divergences between depressed and non-depressed participants. RESULTS: Among 26 OACs (13 depressed, 13 non-depressed), qualitative analyses revealed four major themes indicative of depression (i.e. anhedonia, reduction in social relationships/loneliness, lack of meaning and purpose, lack of usefulness/feeling like a burden) and four minor themes (i.e. attitude towards treatment, mood, regret/guilt, physical symptoms/limitations). Themes of adaptation and acceptance of symptoms also emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Of the eight themes identified, only two overlap with DSM criteria. This supports the need to develop assessment methods of depression in OACs that are less reliant on DSM criteria and distinct from existing measures. This may improve the ability to identify depression in this population.

African-centered coping, resilience, and psychological distress in Black prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Blacks have the highest incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer (PCa) in the U.S. Black PCa patients (PCaP) also report high psychological distress. Identifying culturally specific coping strategies that lower distress among Black PCaP could help improve psychological interventions for this group. African-centered coping (strategies unique to the structure of Black personality and the African-centered worldview) have been identified. We hypothesized that these coping strategies and resilience would be associated with lower psychological distress (anxiety and depression) in Black PCaP. METHODS: Black PCaP (N = 95) completed a survey assessing African-centered coping strategies, resilience, anxiety, and depression. Multiple regression was employed to examine African-centered coping strategies and resilience as predictors of psychological distress. RESULTS: Participants were aged M = 67 ± 9 years and 52% had late-stage PCa. Twenty percent met criteria for clinically significant anxiety, and 17% for depression. African-centered coping strategies were not associated with lower anxiety or depression, while resilience was associated with decreased anxiety (r = -0.45, p < 0.001) and depression (r = -0.54, p < 0.001). Mediation analyses did not support an indirect association among African-centered coping strategies, resilience, and anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to hypotheses, African-centered coping strategies were not associated with psychological distress. However, as predicted, greater resilience was associated with lower anxiety and depression. These findings support the relevancy of resilience in Blacks' psychological adjustment to PCa. It might be worthwhile to explore African-centered coping strategies that help Black PCaP cope with distress.

The Association Between Patient-Reported and Objective Oral Anticancer Medication Adherence Measures: A Systematic Review
.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Oral anticancer medication (OAM) use has been steadily increasing, leading to several patient benefits. A notable challenge for nurses is accurate monitoring of patient OAM regimens because nonadherence is associated with poor health outcomes and decreased survival. Currently, no gold standard measure of OAM adherence exists. The authors conducted a systematic review of the association between objective and patient-reported measures of OAM adherence.
. LITERATURE SEARCH: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO®, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL® databases through November 2014. 
. DATA EVALUATION: Articles were independently reviewed to determine whether they included an original characterization of the level of association between objective and patient-reported measures of OAM adherence.
. SYNTHESIS: From a total of 11,135 articles retrieved, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Objective adherence was primarily assessed using pill counts or Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMSCap™). Patient-reported adherence was most commonly assessed using study-specific questionnaires. Significant positive correlations were observed between objective and patient-reported adherence across most studies, with three studies reporting higher rates of adherence via patient reporting.
. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variation in the OAMs and measures used, patient-reported adherence rates were equal to or higher than objective adherence measures across studies. Social desirability bias may be a concern; however, given the significant concordance observed, using patient-reported methods in future studies of OAM adherence may be justified. 
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This review provides evidence to support nursing use of patient-reported measures to accurately monitor OAM adherence and potentially improve the quality of patient-provider communication.

Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: prevalence, medical treatments, and psychosocial interventions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will discuss erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy . It will focus on the prevalence and current treatments for erectile dysfunction as well as the emotional impact of erectile dysfunction and the current psychosocial interventions designed to help patients cope with this side effect. RECENT FINDINGS: Although there is a large discrepancy in prevalence rates of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy, several recent studies have cited rates as high as 85%. The concept of 'penile rehabilitation' is now the standard of practice to treat erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. However, many men avoid seeking help or utilizing erectile dysfunction treatments. This avoidance is related to the shame, frustration, and distress many men with erectile dysfunction and their partners experience. Recent psychosocial interventions have been developed to facilitate the use of treatments and help men cope with erectile dysfunction. These interventions have shown initial promise, however, continued intervention development is needed to reduce distress and improve long-term erectile function outcomes. SUMMARY: Erectile dysfunction is a significant problem following prostate cancer surgery. Although there are effective medical treatments, the development of psychosocial interventions should continue to evolve to maximize the assistance we can give to men and their partners.

Couples-based interventions following prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction following prostate cancer (PC) treatment often results in sexual avoidance and a loss of sexual intimacy, which can lead to relationship distress. This review aims to evaluate six studies intended to address relational and sexual intimacy following PC treatment and discuss methodological concerns which may help produce more effective interventions. METHODS: Electronic databases used to conduct literature searches included Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they were: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using samples of men diagnosed with PC of any stage, had a psychosocial intervention, and addressed at least one sexual and relational outcome. RESULTS: As a whole, the literature has produced mixed results. While significant findings were reported, many of the primary hypotheses were not achieved. The six studies show that men with PC may benefit from education and support related to treatment options for erectile dysfunction (ED), whereas their partners may benefit more from interventions focused on relational issues. Important methodological limitations included: selection of general outcome measures as opposed to measures specific to sexuality or intimacy outcomes, lack of assessing distress or bother of the patient/couples as study entry criteria, heterogeneity of study populations, and lack of innovative intervention content as the current studies tested standard educational interventions, sex therapies techniques, and couples therapy strategies with only marginal success. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions based on innovative theoretical approaches as well as study designs that address the outlined methodological limitations are needed in this area.