RESUMO
Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a highly prevalent illness affecting women globally. Lactobacilli, which make up the majority of healthy vaginal microbiota (VMB), serve as a powerful barrier against infections. Probiotic therapy has been recommended for the treatment or prevention of VVC. Aim of work: To compare the in vivo therapeutic effects of Lactobacillus johnsonii (B-2178) vs. Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5®) on VVC in a rat model, particularly highlighting the immune response of the host vaginal epithelium. Methods: In total, 30 female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 groups; Group 1: no intervention, Group 2: ovariectomy group, while animals in Groups 3-5 were subjected to ovariectomy and an intravaginal inoculation of Candida albicans (C. albicans) to establish VVC. The animals in Groups 4 and 5 received intravaginal lactobacilli treatment with L. acidophilus (LA-5®) and L. johnsonii (B-2178) strains, respectively, for 7 days. C. albicans load was measured in a vaginal lavage 1, 3, and 7 days after the stoppage of the treatment. Histological, morphometric, and immunohistochemical studies of the vaginal tissues were done. IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-17 were measured in the vaginal tissue. Results: Both L. johnsonii and L. acidophilus significantly reduced C. albicans vaginal load (250 ± 77.46 and 133.33 ± 40.82 CFU/mL) compared to the count before treatment in both groups (4,850 ± 1419.51 and 4966.67 ± 852.45 CFU/mL) even after 7 days of stoppage of lactobacilli treatment. A statistically significant reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IFN-γ was reported in both treated groups compared to the infected untreated group. L. johnsonii has a significant effect on the reduction of hyphae formation of C. albicans as well as the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) immunostaining density of vaginal tissue compared to L. acidophilus. Moreover, treatment with L. johnsonii significantly minimized the epithelium damage triggered by C. albicans infection and restored normal vaginal architecture as evidenced by the histologic and morphometric studies when compared to L. acidophilus. Conclusion: Through maintaining an immune tolerant state in the vaginal epithelium and ameliorating the undesirable uncontrolled inflammatory response in the vaginal tissue, L. johnsonii (B-2178) has the potential to be utilized alone or in combination with other lactobacilli species in probiotic clinical trials to treat or prevent VVC.
RESUMO
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection remains a challenging threat because of limited treatment options. Ceftaroline was identified as having potent anti-MRSA activity. Aim: To evaluate the susceptibility of MRSA to gentamicin, macrolides, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, and ceftaroline and to perform molecular characterization of different resistance genes as aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes, ermA and ermC, and vanA and vanB genes. Patients and Methods: One hundred non-duplicate MRSA strains were isolated from different samples of hospitalized patients in Cairo University teaching hospitals from November 2015 to August 2016. Determination of antibiotic susceptibility was done using disk diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentration followed by detection of resistance genes by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Of 100 MRSA isolates, 63 (63%) were resistant to gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and ciprofloxacin, however, all were sensitive to ceftaroline. Fifteen isolates (15%) were vancomycin intermediate resistant and were sensitive to ceftaroline as well. Conclusion: Ceftaroline was potent against MRSA, which was found to be non-susceptible to vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and gentamicin and it may represent a successful treatment for MRSA infections.
