Age and gender-based categorization of very premature, premature, and non-premature acute myocardial infarction: A comparison of clinical and angiographic profile and in-hospital outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to assess and compare the distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics and composite adverse clinical outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among "very premature", "premature", and "non-premature" patients with "ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STE-ACS)" presented at a tertiary care center. METHODS: We included consecutive patients diagnosed with STE-ACS undergoing primary PCI. The "very premature" was defined as ≤40 years for males and ≤ 45 years for females, "premature" as <55 years for males and < 65 years for females, and "non-premature" as ≥55 years for males and ≥ 65 years for females. Clinical characteristics, angiographic patterns, and hospital course were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: In a sample of 4686 patients, 78.8%(3691) were male, and the average age was 55.6 ± 11 years. In total, 12%(561) were categorized as very premature, 38.3%(1797) as premature, and 49.7%(2328) as non-premature. The distribution of clinical characteristics in very premature, premature, and non-premature groups were as follows; hypertension in 44.6% vs. 53.5% vs. 54.9%; p < 0.001, diabetes in 30.3% vs. 36.8% vs. 35.5%; p = 0.018, smoking in 29.6% vs. 23.3% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.005, obesity in 19.4% vs. 18.4% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.008, single vessel diseases in 58.8% vs. 37.8% vs. 28.8%; p < 0.001, and composite adverse clinical outcomes in 14.1% vs. 16.7% vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we have a substantial burden of premature STE-ACS. Very premature STE-ACS was found to be associated with a better prognosis, but a substantial burden of composite adverse clinical outcomes was also observed.

Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.

Background: Distal embolization due to microthrombus fragments formed during predilation ballooning is considered one of the possible mechanisms of slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high thrombus burden (≥4 grade) with and without predilation ballooning for culprit lesion preparation. Methodology. This prospective descriptive cross-sectional study included patients with a high thrombus burden (≥4 grades) who underwent primary PCI. Propensity-matched cohorts of patients with and without predilation ballooning in a 1 : 1 ratio were compared for the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR. Results: A total of 765 patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. The mean age was 55.75 ± 11.54 years, and 78.6% (601) were males. Predilation ballooning was conducted in 346 (45.2%) patients. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR was significantly higher (41.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.001) in patients with predilation ballooning than in those without preballooning, respectively. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR also remained significantly higher for the predilation ballooning cohort with an incidence rate of 41.3% as against 30.1% (p=0.002) for the propensity-matched cohort of patients without predilation ballooning with a relative risk of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.24). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate remained higher but insignificant, among patients with and without predilation ballooning (8.1% vs. 4.9%; p=0.090). Conclusion: In conclusion, predilation ballooning can be associated with an increased risk of incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during primary PCI in patients with high thrombus burden.

Successful radio-frequency catheter ablation of two cases of supraventricular tachycardia via a left-sided inferior vena cava.

Congenital venous anomalies are uncommon, incidental findings encountered during adult interventional electrophysiology procedures. Femoral venous access is conventionally used during cardiac electrophysiology studies to gain access to the heart. The chance finding of an inferior vena cava anomaly may preclude the performance of these procedures from the femoral approach. We describe two cases in which we were able to successfully perform different radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures in the presence of an unusual venous anomaly, the left-sided IVC.