Polygenic predisposition to venous thromboembolism is associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates

Genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis may impact COVID-19 infection and its sequelae. Participants in the ongoing prospective cohort study, Million Veteran Program (MVP), who were tested for COVID-19, with European ancestry, were evaluated for associations with polygenic venous thromboembolic risk, Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) (rs6025) and prothrombin gene 3 -UTR mutation (F2 G20210A)(rs1799963), and their interactions. Logistic regression models assessed genetic associations with VTE diagnosis, COVID-19 (positive) testing rates and outcome severity (modified WHO criteria), and post-test conditions, adjusting for outpatient anticoagulation medication usage, age, sex, and genetic principal components. 108,437 out of 464,961 European American MVP participants were tested for COVID-19 with 9786 (9%) positive. PRS(VTE), FVL, F2 G20210A were not significantly associated with the propensity of being tested for COVID-19. PRS(VTE) was significantly associated with a positive COVID-19 test in F5 wild type (WT) individuals (OR 1.05; 95% CI [1.02-1.07]), but not in FVL carriers (0.97, [0.91-1.94]). There was no association with severe outcome for FVL, F2 G20210A or PRS(VTE). Outpatient anticoagulation usage in the two years prior to testing was associated with worse clinical outcomes. PRS(VTE) was associated with prevalent VTE diagnosis among both FVL carriers or F5 wild type individuals as well as incident VTE in the two years prior to testing. Increased genetic propensity for VTE in the MVP was associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates, suggesting a role of coagulation in the initial steps of COVID-19 infection. Key PointsO_LIIncreased genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis is associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates. C_LIO_LIPRS for VTE further risk stratifies factor V Leiden carriers regarding their VTE risk. C_LI

Intensive Single Cell Analysis Reveals Immune Cell Diversity among Healthy Individuals

It is believed that immune responses are different between individuals and at different times. In addition, personal health histories and unique environmental conditions should collectively determine the present state of immune cells. However, the cellular and molecular system mechanisms underlying such heterogeneity remain largely elusive. In this study, we conducted a systematic time-lapse single-cell analysis, using 171 single-cell libraries and 30 mass cytometry datasets intensively for seven healthy individuals. We found substantial diversity in immune cell populations and their gene expression patterns between different individuals. These patterns showed daily fluctuations even within the same individual spending a usual life. Similar diversities were also observed for the T cell receptor and B cell receptor repertoires. Detailed immune cell profiles at healthy statuses should give an essential background information to understand their immune responses, when the individual is exposed to various environmental conditions. To demonstrate this idea, we conducted the similar analysis for the same individuals on the vaccination of Influenza and SARS-CoV-2, since the date and the dose of the antigens are well-defined in these cases. In fact, we found that the distinct responses to vaccines between individuals, althougth key responses are common. Single cell immune cell profile data should make fundamental data resource to understand variable immune responses, which are unique to each individual.

A MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, confers protective effects in COVID-19 infection

RationaleA common MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, is associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but its role in the SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity is unclear. ObjectivesTo assess whether rs35705950-T confers differential risk for clinical outcomes associated with COVID-19 infection among participants in the Million Veteran Program (MVP) and COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI). MethodsMVP participants were examined for an association between the incidence or severity of COVID-19 and the presence of a MUC5B rs35705950-T allele. Comorbidities and clinical events were extracted from the electronic health records (EHR). The analysis was performed within each ancestry group in the MVP, adjusting for sex, age, age2, and first twenty principal components followed by a trans-ethnic meta-analysis. We then pursued replication and performed a meta-analysis with the trans-ethnic summary statistics from the HGI. A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) of the rs35705950-T was conducted to explore associated pathophysiologic conditions. Measurements and Main ResultsA COVID-19 severity scale was modified from the World Health Organization criteria, and phenotypes derived from the International Classification of Disease-9/10 were extracted from EHR. Presence of rs35705950-T was associated with fewer hospitalizations (Ncases=25353, Ncontrols=631,024; OR=0.86 [0.80-0.93], p=7.4 x 10-5) in trans-ethnic meta-analysis within MVP and joint meta-analyses with the HGI (N=1641311; OR=0.89 [0.85-0.93], p =1.9 x 10-6). Moreover, individuals of European Ancestry with at least one copy of rs35705950-T had fewer post-COVID-19 pneumonia events (OR=0.85 [0.76-0.96], p =0.008). PheWAS exclusively revealed pulmonary involvement. ConclusionsThe MUC5B variant rs35705950-T is protective in COVID-19 infection.

Proton pump inhibitor use is not associated with severe COVID-19 related outcomes: A propensity score weighted analysis of a national veteran cohort

Background and AimsLow pH deactivates most pathogens, including coronaviruses. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are potent gastric acid suppressing medications. Whether PPI use vs non-use is associated with severe Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to compare severe COVID-19 outcomes between current outpatient PPI users and non-users. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective propensity score-weighted analysis of a national cohort of US veterans with established care who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) through January 9, 2021, and who had 60 days of follow-up. The positive test date was the index date. Current outpatient PPI use up to and including the index date (primary exposure) was compared to non-use, defined as no PPI prescription fill in the 365 days prior to the index date. The primary outcome was a composite of use of mechanical ventilation or death within 60 days. Weighted logistic regression models evaluated severe COVID-19 outcomes between current PPI users vs non-users. ResultsOf 97,674 Veterans with SARS-CoV-2 testing, 14,958 tested positive (6262 [41.9%] current PPI users, 8696 [58.1%] non-users) and comprised the analytic cohort. After weighting, all covariates were well-balanced. In the weighted cohort, there was no difference in the primary composite outcome (8.2% vs 8.0%; OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16), secondary composite outcome, nor individual component outcomes between current PPI users and non-users. There was no significant interaction between age and PPI use on outcomes. ConclusionAmong patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, current PPI use vs non-use is not associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes.

Assessing the impact of reduced travel on exportation dynamics of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19)

The impact of the drastic reduction in travel volume within mainland China in January and February 2020 was quantified with respect to reports of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections outside China. Data on confirmed cases diagnosed outside China were analyzed using statistical models to estimate the impact of travel reduction on three epidemiological outcome measures: (i) the number of exported cases, (ii) the probability of a major epidemic, and (iii) the time delay to a major epidemic. From 28 January to 7 February 2020, we estimated that 226 exported cases (95% confidence interval: 86, 449) were prevented, corresponding to a 70.4% reduction in incidence compared to the counterfactual scenario. The reduced probability of a major epidemic ranged from 7% to 20% in Japan, which resulted in a median time delay to a major epidemic of two days. Depending on the scenario, the estimated delay may be less than one day. As the delay is small, the decision to control travel volume through restrictions on freedom of movement should be balanced between the resulting estimated epidemiological impact and predicted economic fallout.

Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among passengers on evacuation flights

A total of 565 Japanese citizens were evacuated from Wuhan, China to Japan. All passengers were screened for symptoms and also undertook reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing, identifying 5 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic passengers testing positive for 2019-nCoV. We show that the screening result is suggestive of the asymptomatic ratio at 41.6%.