Is kinesiophobia associated with functional outcome measures in patients following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between kinesiophobia and functional outcomes in patients following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr). METHODS: Twenty-one patients (six males, 15 females) who underwent MPFLr between 2016 and 2020, (23.57 ± 9.49 years old) with a mean follow up period of 52.33 ± 24.82 months were included in the study. Following an assessment of patellar stability and alignment, kinesiophobia levels, function and balance were measured. The kinesiophobia was measured using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, while functional outcomes were assessed with the single-leg hop test, Y-Balance test and single-leg sway index. The self-reported function was measured by Kujala patellofemoral score and Lysholm knee score. RESULTS: The patients exhibited kinesiophobia scores of 43.10 ± 6.90. A negative correlation existed between kinesiophobia and both the Kujala scores (r = -0.75, P < 0.001) and the Lysholm scores (r = -0.79, P < 0.001). Moderate negative correlations were observed between kinesiophobia and the single-leg hop distance (r = -0.64, P < 0.01), as well as in Y-Balance test anterior reach distance (r = -0.51, P < 0.01) and posterolateral reach distance (r = -0.55, P < 0.01). Additionally, a low negative correlation was noted between kinesiophobia and Y-Balance test posteromedial reach distances (r = -0.43, P = 0.05), as well as the total sway index (r = -0.46, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A high level of kinesiophobia was strongly correlated with self-reported functional scores and moderately correlated with measured functional outcomes. The findings underscore a notable prevalence of kinesiophobia following biomechanically successful MPFLr. Investigating the impact of kinesiophobia on outcomes after MPFLr may provide a better understanding of patient recovery.

Does the Extent of Tear Influence Pseudoparesis in Patients With Isolated Subscapularis Tears?

BACKGROUND: Surgeons tend to associate pseudoparesis with massive rotator cuff tears. However, little is known about the degree to which isolated subscapularis tears might be associated with pseudoparesis of the shoulder. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Is the extent of subscapularis tears associated with pseudoparesis? METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified all patients with subscapularis tears from 2010 to 2021 in the longitudinally maintained shoulder arthroscopy archive of one university hospital's shoulder section of the orthopaedic department. After exclusion, 106 of 152 patients with isolated subscapularis tears who underwent arthroscopic surgery were included in the study. Sixty percent of the patients were women, and the mean ± SD age was 52 ± 11 years. Patients who were scheduled for arthroscopic surgery were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of pseudoparesis preoperatively. Pseudoparesis was considered to be active forward elevation > 45º but < 90º, which is a simple and reproducible measurement that can be taken using a goniometer, and demonstrated complete passive forward elevation. Pseudoparesis was present in 41% (43 of 106) of patients with an isolated subscapularis tear. Data on tear severity (according to Lafosse type, noted during arthroscopy), integrity of the subscapularis tendon (noted during arthroscopy), fatty degeneration (using the Goutallier grading system on MRI), arthroscopic findings of biceps disorder, superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, and pain severity (measured by VAS score) were recorded. We used logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship between pseudoparesis and disruption of the tendinous part of the subscapularis. RESULTS: After accounting for potentially confounding factors such as biceps disorders and muscle atrophy, we found that pseudoparesis was associated with decreased tear severity according to the Lafosse classification (adjusted OR 0.2 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.7]; p = 0.01) and with disruption of the tendinous portion of the subscapularis (adjusted OR 21 [4 to 128]; p = 0.001). Patients with less severe tears (Lafosse type I) have lower odds of experiencing pseudoparesis compared with those with more severe tears (Lafosse types II, III, and IV), and patients with disruption of the tendinous portion of the subscapularis have substantially higher odds of pseudoparesis compared with those with an intact tendinous portion. No association was found between pseudoparesis and subscapularis fatty degeneration, biceps disorder, or SLAP lesions. CONCLUSION: This study provides initial evidence suggesting that isolated subscapularis tears are associated with pseudoparesis. The main finding of this study is that isolated subscapularis tears that involve the tendon extending to the inferior part of the subscapularis have higher odds of being found with pseudoparesis. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining the integrity of the superior tendinous part of the subscapularis for active forward elevation > 90°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Proprioception After Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

BACKGROUND: Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has some potential advantages over the reconstruction technique, which include but are not limited to better knee sensation due to preservation of the natural ACL tissue in patients compared with tendon graft. Proprioception is impaired after ACL injuries and the sense of the joint position is lost. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare arthroscopic ACL primary repair and ACL reconstruction techniques clinically and functionally and analyze the differences in proprioception. It was hypothesized that primary repair would restore knee joint proprioception more successfully because the original tissue of the ACL is preserved. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 63 patients (34 underwent reconstruction and 29 underwent primary repair between 2017 and 2020) and 33 healthy controls, as well as the healthy knees of the operated groups, were evaluated between 24 and 48 months (mean, 29 months) postoperatively. Patients with proximal femoral avulsion tears and stump quality suitable for repair underwent primary repair, and those with tears outside these criteria underwent reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft. Proprioception was evaluated using the active joint position sensation method during weightbearing, with a digital inclinometer used to measure differences between the target and achieved flexion angles of 15°, 30°, and 60°. RESULTS: At 15° of knee flexion, the deviation angles for the healthy knee of the reconstruction and primary repair groups were significantly smaller than those of the control group (P < .001), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of deviation angle at 30° and 60° of flexion. The deviation angle of the operated knees was statistically significantly larger in the reconstruction group than in the primary repair group at all angles. The deviation angles at 15°, 30°, and 60° were 2.83°, 2.66°, and 2.66° in the reconstruction group and 1.00°, 1.00°, and 1.33° in the primary repair group, respectively (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between the reconstruction and primary repair groups in terms of clinical scores. CONCLUSION: Primary ACL repair can preserve proprioception in a well-selected patient group. In short-term follow-up, primary repair of the ACL in patients with proximal femoral avulsion tears and stump quality suitable for repair appears to be proprioceptively protective. Future studies are needed to clarify the long-term consequences of primary repair on proprioception in a larger population.

Comparison of balance and function in the long term after all arthroscopic ATFL repair surgery.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the balance, ROM, clinical scores, kinesiophobia and functional outcomes of patients after all-arthroscopic ATFL repair surgery with the non-operated side and healthy control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with follow up time 37.32 ± 12.51 months and twenty-five healthy controls participated in the study. Postural stability was evaluated with the Biodex® balance system by measuring overall (OSI), anterior-posterior (API), and mediolateral (MLI) stability index. Dynamic balance and function were measured using the Y-balance test (YBT) and single-leg hop test (SLH). Limb symmetry index for SLH and contralateral comparisons (YBT, OSI, API, MLI) was performed. The AOFAS score and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) were applied. Two subgroups were created (with OLT and without OLT). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups. There was no statistically significant difference between bilateral OSI, API, MLI values and YBT anterior reach distances of all groups. Single leg OSI (0.78 ± 0.27/0.55 ± 0.12), API (0.55 ± 0.22/0.41 ± 0.10), and MLI (0.40 ± 0.16/ 0.26 ± 0.08) values were significantly worse and YBT posteromedial (73.88 ± 15.70/89.62 ± 12.25), posterolateral reach (78.03 ± 14.08/92.62 ± 8.25) and the SLH distance (117.14 ± 27.84/165.90 ± 20.91) were significantly lower on the patients than controls (p < 0.05), respectively. In contralateral comparisons, all reach distances on YBT were similar and SLH limb symmetry index of the operated side was 98.25%. AOFAS scores of the patients were 92.62 ± 11.13, TSK scores were 46.45 ± 11.32, and 21 patients (84%) had kinesiophobia. CONCLUSION: AOFAS score, limb symmetry index, and bilateral balance of the patients were successful; however, there is single-leg postural stability insufficiency and kinesiophobia. Although the extremity symmetry index of the operated side of the patients was 98.25, the fact that these values are lower than those of the healthy control may have been caused by kinesiophobia. During the long-term rehabilitation, kinesiophobia should be considered and single-leg balance exercises should be monitored during the rehabilitation period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment For Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire in individuals with greater trochanteric pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of lateral hip pain. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to translate the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire into the Turkish language and to examine its reliability and validity. METHODS: 108 individuals (45 female, 63 male) participated in the translation and the reliability and validity analysis. The original VISA-G questionnaire was translated into Turkish language using Beaton guidelines. The Turkish version of the VISA-G, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were applied to 108 individuals with GTPS for convergent validity. The VISA-G was retested to investigate its reliability after one week. RESULTS: The VISA-G had a good correlation with HHS (r = 0.694, p < .001), ODI (r = -0.659, p < .001), OHS (r = 0.678, p < .001), and IPAQ (r = 0.440, p < .001). The reliability and internal consistency were excellent (ICC (2,1) value = 0.943; Cronbach's α = 0.946, respectively). And no floor and ceiling effects were revealed related VISA-G. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the VISA-G has good validity and excellent reliability. It can be used in clinical and research practices in the Turkish population with GTPS.