Pilot pharmacokinetic study of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): investigation of systemic and intracellular interactions between TDF and abacavir, lamivudine, or lopinavir-ritonavir.

Previous work has demonstrated the existence of systemic interaction between tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and didanosine as well as between TDF and lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). Here we investigated TDF interactions with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) lamivudine (3TC) and abacavir (ABC), comparing both the concentrations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in plasma and the intracellular concentrations of their triphosphate metabolites (NRTI-TP) for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving these NRTIs with TDF and after 4 weeks of TDF interruption. We also looked at interactions between TDF-ABC and LPV/r, comparing patients receiving or not receiving LPV/r. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after dosing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure NRTIs and NRTI-TPs. Statistical analyses were performed on pharmacokinetic parameters: the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (AUC(0-4)), the maximum concentration of the drug (C(max)), and the residual concentration of the drug at the end of the dosing interval (C(trough)) for plasma and the AUC(0-4) and C(trough) for intracellular data. Among the groups of patient discontinuing TDF, the very long intracellular half-life of elimination (150 h) of TFV-DP (the diphosphorylated metabolite of TFV, corresponding to a triphosphorylated species) was confirmed. Comparison between groups as well as the longitudinal study showed no significant systemic or intracellular interaction between TDF and ABC or 3TC. Significant differences were observed between patients receiving LVP/r and those receiving nevirapine. For ABC, plasma exposure was decreased (40%) under LVP/r, while, in contrast, plasma exposure to TFV was increased by 50% and the intracellular TFV-DP AUC(0-4) was increased by 59%. A trend for a gender effect was observed for TFV-DP at the intracellular level, with higher and C(trough) values for women.

Partial immunological and mitochondrial recovery after reducing didanosine doses in patients on didanosine and tenofovir-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has a safe toxicity profile; however, administration together with didanosine (ddl) increases ddl levels causing mitochondrial damage and CD4+ T-cell decline. We assessed whether a simple reduction of the ddl dose in patients receiving ddl (400 mg/day) and TDF could revert this side effect. METHODS: Immunological and mitochondrial changes were analysed in 20 patients at baseline, after 14 months of receiving ddl (400 mg/day), TDF (300 mg/day) and nevirapine (NVP; 400 mg/day) and 14 months after a ddl dose reduction to 250 mg/day. Immunological analyses measured CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts and mitochondrial studies in peripheral blood mononuclear cells assessed mitochondrial DNA content by quantitative real-time PCR, cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity by spectrophotometry and mitochondrial protein synthesis (COX-II versus beta-actin or COX-IV expression) by western blot. RESULTS: Treatment with TDF, ddl (400 mg/day) and NVP for 14 months produced significant decreases in mitochondrial parameters and CD4+ T-cell counts. The reduction in ddl dose resulted in mitochondrial DNA recovery; however, the remaining mitochondrial parameters remained significantly decreased. Levels of CD4+ T-cells were partially restored in 35% of patients. Subjects presenting a significant reduction in CD4+ T-cells during the high ddl dose period showed greater mitochondrial impairment in this stage and better mitochondrial and immunological recovery after drug reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of high ddl doses together with TDF was associated with mitochondrial damage, which may explain the observed CD4+ T-cell decay. A reduction of the ddl dose led to mitochondrial DNA recovery, but was not sufficient to recover baseline CD4+ T-cell counts. Other mitochondrial toxicity in addition to DNA gamma-polymerase inhibition could be responsible for CD4+ T-cell toxicity.