Diagnostic performance of lactate dehydrogenase as a potential biomarker in predicting preeclampsia and associated factors.

Background: Preeclampsia (PE), a pregnancy specific syndrome, is defined as new-onset hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) and proteinuria diagnosed after gestational week 20 or new-onset pre-eclampsia associated signs in the absence of proteinuria, and it may tend to present as late as 4-6 weeks' postpartum period. It is a leading cause of maternal mortality in both developed and developing countries. In order to prevent PE, the disease must be diagnosed at its earliest stage, however, the triads of high blood pressure, edema and albuminuria is neither specific nor sensitive enough for diagnosing the disease. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is useful biochemical marker reflecting the occurrence of complications associated with preeclampsia. Besides, it has been suggested as potential biomarker to predict the severity of preeclampsia and as indicator of multi-organ involvement. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of LDH, which is affordable and easy to test, as a potential clinical biomarker to predict onset of preeclampsia. Methods: A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted as of September 9 to December 24, 2022 at Debre Birhan Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DBCSH). A total of 132 study subjects (66 preeclamptic and 66 normotensive controls) were enrolled in the study. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and determine diagnostic accuracy of LDH. Youden's index was used to identify an optimal cut-off point for LDH in detecting preeclampsia associated complications. Result: AUC for LDH was found to be 0.963 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.0; p = 0.000) from ROC curve analysis. An optimal cut-off point for LDH was 376.5 U/L having a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5 and 90.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Serum LDH had an AUC of greater than 0.8 and showed good diagnostic accuracy in predicting development of preeclampsia. Disease duration, gestational age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure among enormous number of predictor variables had association with serum level of LDH.

Systematic review on the frequency of occurrence in nerve branches and the side of the face involved in trigeminal neuralgia and its clinical implication.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review is to answer the focused question, "What is the commonly affected nerve branch and the side of the face involved in trigeminal neuralgia?" Types of studies reviewed: This systematic review included studies reporting commonly affected trigeminal nerve branches and the side of the face involved in trigeminal neuralgia. To find the potential studies published, the authors utilized specific search databases such as PubMed, and Google scholar. Results: Among 132 published studies, the authors selected only 11 to be included for this systematic review. The sample size ranged from 50 to 43,518 study subjects. This review identified that the mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve were the most affected, followed by the maxillary branch. The review also identified that the right side of the face was predominantly affected. Conclusion and practical implications: The authors of this review identified a higher occurrence of trigeminal neuralgia in the mandibular division of the nerve, commonly affected on the right side of the face. Further prospective-based research and meta-analysis are required to validate the commonly occurring trigeminal nerve branch and sidedness of the face involved with its clinical implications in trigeminal neuralgia.