Effect of verapamil on prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients implanted with an implantable atrial defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The role of verapamil in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with recurrent AF is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of verapamil on the prevention of AF in patients implanted with an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD). METHODS: The effects of verapamil (240 mg/day) on the total duration of AF, number of AF recurrences, and number of cardioversions were prospectively evaluated in a randomized, crossover fashion over an 8-week period in 11 patients (9 men, 2 women; mean age: 60 +/- 6 years) implanted with an IAD. RESULTS: Implantable atrial defibrillators successfully converted 13 of 14 (93%) spontaneous episodes of AF. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of cardioversion (86 vs. 100%, p = 0.8), the total duration of AF (173 +/- 198 vs. 270 +/- 241 h, p = 0.5), the number of AF episodes (8.5 +/- 9.0 vs. 9.3 +/- 10.2, p = 0.3), and the number of cardioversions (1.7 +/- 2.4 vs. 1.8 +/- 2.1 p = 0.7) with or without treatment with verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that treatment with verapamil has no significant effect on the prevention of AF in patients treated with an LAD.

Time course of recovery of left atrial mechanical dysfunction after cardioversion of spontaneous atrial fibrillation with the implantable atrial defibrillator.

The effect of the timing of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on left atrial mechanical function was studied in 11 patients treated with the implantable atrial defibrillator. Results of this study suggested that prompt cardioversion of spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation within 48 hours after onset was associated with early resolution of left atrial mechanical dysfunction seen after cardioversion.

The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the impact of intermittent atrial fibrillation (AF) on health-related quality of life (QoL). BACKGROUND: Intermittent AF is a common condition with little data on health-related QoL questionnaires to guide investigational therapies. METHODS: Outpatients from four centers, with documented AF (n = 152), completed validated QoL questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36], Specific Activity, Symptom Checklist, Illness Intrusiveness and University of Toronto AF Severity Scales). Comparison groups were made up of healthy individuals (n = 47) and four cardiac control groups: published (n = 78) and created for study (n = 69) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA); published heart failure (n = 216) and published postmyocardial infarction (MI) (n = 107). RESULTS: Across all domains of the SF-36, AF patients reported substantially worse QoL than healthy controls (1.3 to 2.0 standard deviation units), with scores of 24%, 23%, 16% and 30% lower than healthy individuals on measures of physical and social functioning, mental and general health, respectively (all p < 0.001). Patients with AF were either significantly worse (p < 0.05, published controls) or as impaired (study controls) as either PTCA or post-MI patients on all domains of the SF-36 and the same as heart failure controls on SF-36 psychological subscales. Patients with AF were as impaired or worse than study PTCA controls on measures of illness intrusiveness, activity limitations and symptoms. Associations between objective disease indexes and subjective QoL measures had poor correlations and accounted for <6% of the total variability in QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life is as impaired in patients with intermittent AF as in patients with significant structural heart disease. Patients' perception of QoL is not dependent on the objective measures of disease severity that are usually employed.

Initial clinical experience with ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Metrix Investigators.

BACKGROUND: A recent study has shown that the implantable atrial defibrillator can restore sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation when therapy was delivered under physician observation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambulatory use of the implantable atrial defibrillator. METHODS AND RESULTS: An atrial defibrillator was implanted in 105 patients (75 men; mean age, 59+/-12 years) with recurrent, symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. After successful 3-month testing, patients could transition to ambulatory delivery of shock therapy. Patients completed questionnaires regarding shock therapy discomfort and therapy satisfaction using a 10-point visual-analog scale (1 represented "not at all," 10 represented "extremely") after each treated episode of atrial fibrillation. During a mean follow-up of 11.7 months, 48 of 105 patients satisfied criteria for transition and received therapy for 275 episodes of atrial fibrillation. Overall shock therapy efficacy was 90% with 1.6+/-1.2 shocks delivered per episode (median, 1). Patients rated shock discomfort as 5.2+/-2.4 for successful therapy and 4.2+/-2.2 for unsuccessful therapy (P:>0.05). The satisfaction score was higher for successful versus unsuccessful therapy (3.4+/-3. 3 versus 8.7+/-1.3, P:<0.05). There was no ventricular proarrhythmia observed throughout the course of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator can safely and successfully convert most episodes of atrial fibrillation, often requiring only a single shock. Successful therapy is associated with high satisfaction and only moderate discomfort.

Decreasing the number of leads required for an implantable atrial defibrillator: use of a new 2-lead system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a new 2-lead system for detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial defibrillation. METHODS: In 16 patients undergoing elective cardioversion of AF, a 2-lead system was compared with the conventional 3-lead system in a randomized trial. The new 2-lead system consisted of a catheter with a distal bipolar right ventricular electrode pair and a proximal right atrial shock electrode coil and a separate decapolar defibrillation catheter in the coronary sinus. For the 3-lead system, an additional decapolar catheter was placed in the right atrium. AF and sinus rhythm signal amplitude detection and atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) were compared in each patient with both systems. RESULTS: Successful defibrillation was obtained in all patients. ADFT for the 2-lead system was significantly higher compared with the 3-lead system (370 +/- 112 vs 316 +/- 100 V, P < .05; 9.3 +/- 5.2 vs 6.8 +/- 4.2 J, P < .05). In contrast, there was an increase in impedance for the 3-lead system (77 +/- 16 ohms vs 68 +/- 13 ohms; P < .05). AF had a lower signal amplitude compared with sinus rhythm for both systems (P < .05), and the 2-lead system had a lower signal amplitude compared with the 3-lead system for both rhythms (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The use of a 2-lead system with this configuration is not superior to the 3-lead system regarding AF signal amplitude detection and ADFT. Further study is needed with implantable-quality leads in place of the temporary catheters used in this study.

Atrial pacing for suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of atrial pacing in the suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: The efficacy of atrial pacing in suppressing early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation was studied in 12 of 45 (29%) patients with early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion. These patients were randomized to undergo either repeated defibrillation alone or repeated defibrillation followed by high right atrial pacing at 500 ms in a crossover fashion. In patients with persistent early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation despite atrial pacing at 500 ms and repeated defibrillation, atrial pacing at 300 ms was tested. Lastly, if early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation persisted, administration of intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg. kg(-1)) was tested. Atrial pacing at 500 ms after defibrillation prevented early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation in five of 12 (42%) patients, and was significantly more effective than repeated defibrillation (0/9 patients, 0%, P<0.05). During atrial pacing at 500 ms, the density of atrial premature depolarizations (APDs) was significantly decreased (2.4+/-2.4 APDs. min(-1)vs 16.4+/-9.8 APDs. min(-1), P<0. 05) and the coupling interval of atrial premature depolarization was significantly increased (420+/-32 ms vs 398+/-19 ms, P<0.05) as compared to no pacing. In the remaining seven (58%) patients, atrial pacing at 500 ms failed to prevent early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation, but significantly decreased the density of atrial premature depolarization (3.4+/-2.4 APDs. min(-1)vs 14.2+/-4.8 APDs. min(-1), P<0.05) and delayed the onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (33+/-17s vs 11+/-11 s, P<0.05). Atrial pacing at 300 ms decreased the coupling interval of atrial premature depolarization as compared to no pacing and during atrial pacing at 500 ms (P<0.05), but without early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation suppression. Administration of intravenous sotalol was effective in preventing early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation in five of seven (71%) patients where pacing failed to suppress early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that atrial pacing can be useful when combined with transvenous defibrillation in patients with early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation.

Failure of coronary sinus pacing in reducing local atrial conduction delay in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion.

Recent studies suggested that distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing may prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) by reducing site dependent intraatrial conduction delay. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of high right atrial (HRA) and distal CS pacing on local conduction delay in patients with AF. The study population consisted of 10 patients with persistent AF after transvenous atrial defibrillation and 10 control subjects. The local conduction delays along the anterolateral right atrium (RA), in the CS, and at the right atrial septum (RAS), and the incidence of AF in response to an atrial extrastimulus during HRA and distal CS pacing at a drive cycle length of 400, 500, and 600 ms were evaluated. In patients with AF, distal CS and HRA pacing are associated with more prominent and similar extent of conduction delay within the atria, without any significant difference in the dispersion of conduction delay and susceptibility to AF induction (70% vs 60%, P = 0.9). In normal controls, distal CS pacing reduces the conduction delay at the RAS and CS ostium and decreases the dispersion of conduction delay and the propensity for AF induction (0% vs 50%, P = 0.03) compared to HRA pacing. The pacing drive cycle length has no significant effect on conduction delay in patients with AF and normal controls (P > 0.05). Compared to normal controls, patients with AF have significantly longer conduction delay at the RAS and along the anterolateral RA during HRA and distal CS pacing. The result of this study demonstrates that the effect of HRA and distal CS pacing on the local atrial conduction delay in patients with and without AF differ significantly. These patients with AF may have more diffuse atrial anisotropy causing the changes in conduction, and pacing from distal CS in these patients dose not reduce the propensity for AF.

Atrial fibrillation induction and determination of atrial vulnerable period using very low energy synchronized biatrial shock in normal subjects and in patients with atrial fibrillation.

The atrial vulnerable periods (AVP) for shock induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) in humans have not been clearly defined. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of using low energy biatrial shock delivered transvenously for AF induction are unknown. We tested the safety and efficacy of using very low energy biatrial shocks, delivered between the right atrium and the coronary sinus for AF induction and used this technique to characterize the AVP in nine controls and nine patients with AF. Thirty-volt and 60-V 3/3-ms biphasic shocks were delivered, starting from 50 ms before the atrial effective refractory period with 20-ms increments until the end of the QRS interval to determine the AVP front, AVP end, and the AVP duration. Successful AF induction could be achieved in eight (89%) of the nine controls and in nine (100%) of the nine patients with AF without any complication. In patients with AF, the AVP front started significantly earlier within the QRS complex, and the AVP duration and the AVP duration/QRS percent ratios were also significantly greater as compared to controls. Furthermore, a higher induction shock energy in patients with AF was associated with an increase in AF inducibility and significantly increased the AVP duration and AVP duration/QRS percent ratio as compared to the controls. This study demonstrated the safe and efficacy of delivering a very low energy biatrial shock during the AVP within the R wave for AF induction. The characteristics of AVP in patients with AF were significantly different from normal subjects.

Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation after implantation of the Metrix Atrioverter: observations on treated and nontreated episodes. Metrix Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the number and duration of device-treated and self-terminating, nontreated episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) after implantation of the Metrix Atrioverter. BACKGROUND: A recent study has shown that the Atrioverter can rapidly restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF; however, the effect of the device on the clinical course of the arrhythmia in these patients is unknown. METHODS: The Atrioverter was implanted in 51 patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory AF. The device was programmed to periodically monitor the cardiac rhythm. Defibrillation of AF episodes was performed under physician observation. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 260 +/- 144 days, 1,161 episodes of AF were observed during valid monitoring periods in 45 of 51 patients. Forty-one patients experienced 231 episodes for which they sought defibrillation therapy. The average duration of the treated episodes during valid monitoring periods (190 of 231 episodes in 39 of 41 patients) was significantly longer than that of the nontreated episodes (38 +/- 44 vs. 10 +/- 8 h; p < 0.05). The time between episodes requiring Atrioverter therapy increased, and the risk of having an episode requiring treatment decreased. No changes were observed in the number and duration of the short-lasting, nontreated episodes as time since implantation of the device increased. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory AF, the frequency of long-lasting episodes, which were treated under observation with repeated defibrillation using the Atrioverter, decreased. The number and duration of short-lasting, nontreated episodes did not change during the 20-month study period. The effect of ambulatory use of the device on the recurrence of short-lasting episodes needs to be evaluated.

New concepts in atrial defibrillation.

External cardioversion of AF is an established and accepted method for termination of individual episodes of AF. Recent advances have taken place in the area of non-pharmacologic management of AF, and despite its long history and well established technique, defibrillation has not been spared from these advances. The success of low-energy internal atrial defibrillation for the termination of both chronic and acute onset atrial fibrillation has resulted in the development of implantable defibrillators that treat this arrhythmia. Many of the advances have come about as a result of the use of defibrillation in implanted devices for recurrent AF due to the substantial efforts in an attempt to make this form of restoration of sinus rhythm more efficacious and tolerable to the patient. Additionally, the use of other non-pharmacologic control of atrial fibrillation has also been recently explored, namely the use of ablation and atrial pacing. The use of these other non-pharmacologic therapies are likely to both reduce the recurrence rate, as well as enhance the efficacy of defibrillation. However, defibrillation is likely to still be needed to terminate atrial fibrillation for persistent episodes, and its combination with these other therapies is likely synergistic. Electrical therapy to restore sinus rhythm for persistent episodes of atrial fibrillation is likely to be perceived by the patient. Therefore, the concept of patient controlled therapy from implanted devices to treat atrial fibrillation has shown promising results and will likely be a requirement of such devices in the future. Major advances in defibrillation therapy for atrial fibrillation have been made and have resulted in the development of implantable atrial defibrillators. Despite these advances in defibrillation and other therapies for atrial fibrillation, it is likely that combined pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies for atrial fibrillation will prevail over the individual entities themselves. Future study is needed to determine the best therapy or combination of therapies for individual patients with atrial fibrillation.

Design and preliminary data of the Metrix Atrioverter expanded indication trial.

The Metrixtrade mark Atrioverter Expanded Indication Trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of an implantable atrial defibrillator in patients with symptomatic, recurrent and drug refractory atrial fibrillation who also have structural heart disease. In this ongoing multicenter study, all patients are anticoagulated and concomitant antiarrhythmic drug treatment is left to the preference of the physician. Holter monitoring is performed prior to enrollment in the study. Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) are treated under physician observation and when patients are ambulatory, the device is programmed in a monitoring mode. The atrial defibrillation threshold is measured at implantation and at 3, 6 and 12 months thereafter. The performance of the AF detection and R-wave synchronization algorithm is assessed at implantation, at regular follow-up intervals, and each time the patient visits the hospital for treatment of a spontaneous episode of AF. An echocardiogram is performed prior to implantation, at 3 and 6 month follow-up and for patients with an implanted heart valve, after 20 and 50 atrial defibrillation shocks have been delivered. The study started on October 1997 and will end after the last patient enrolled completes his/her six-month post-implantation follow-up, unless a safety issue arises. As of September 1998, 6 patients (2 patients with tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, 1 patient with a mitral valve prosthesis, 2 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 1 patient with congenital heart disease) have been enrolled in the study. Over 350 shocks have been delivered for atrial defibrillation testing or termination of spontaneous AF episodes. There have been no reported cases of ventricular proarrhythmia or inaccurately synchronized shocks and no complications of device therapy in this population.

Experience with a single-pass, dual-electrode implantable atrial defibrillator lead for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

The implantable atrial defibrillator is a new potential nonpharmacologic treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation. The results of this study suggest that a simplified lead configuration, with a single-pass, dual-electrode atrial defibrillation lead can be used for both atrial fibrillation detection and defibrillation with an implantable atrial defibrillator.

Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol.

OBJECTIVES: To study the incidence and mode of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) following successful internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation, and to determine the effects of sotalol in the prevention of ERAF. DESIGN: The incidence and modes of onset of ERAF and the acute effects of intravenous sotalol in the prevention of ERAF were studied retrospectively. SETTING: Electrophysiology laboratory at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 64 patients, mean (SD) age 62 (10) years, who underwent internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (mean duration of atrial fibrillation 31 (39) months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ECGs and intracardiac electrograms recorded during the internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using 3/3 ms biphasic, R wave synchronised shocks. RESULTS: 52 patients (81%) had successful electrical cardioversion, and 20 (31%) of these had ERAF during the procedure. There was no clinical predictor for the occurrence of ERAF. Fifty eight episodes of ERAF were observed. Five ERAF episodes (9%) had preceding bradycardia and 53 (91%) of these were triggered by atrial premature beats with normal preceding heart rate. Atrial premature beats that reinitiated atrial fibrillation had a shorter coupling interval (333 (43) ms v 396 (100), p < 0.001) and a lower prematurity index (0.44 (0.11) v 0. 55 (0.14), p < 0.001) than those that did not reinitiate atrial fibrillation. Repeated shock delivery and increasing the defibrillation energy did not prevent ERAF. Intravenous sotalol infusion decreased the numbers of atrial premature beats and prolonged their coupling interval, and prevented ERAF after repeated defibrillation in 83% of patients with ERAF. CONCLUSIONS: ERAF is a significant clinical problem after successful internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation, and was observed in up to 31% of patients. In most episodes, ERAF was triggered by short coupling atrial premature beats with preceding normal heart rate. Intravenous sotalol was effective in preventing ERAF in most cases.

Implantable atrial defibrillator with a single-pass dual-electrode lead.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility and efficacy of using a single-pass, dual-electrode (Solo) lead for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and defibrillation. BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD) has been extensively studied; however, separate right atrial (RA) and coronary sinus (CS) defibrillation leads are used for the present system. METHODS: We studied the use of the Solo lead for AF detection and defibrillation in 17 patients who underwent cardioversion of chronic AF. The Solo lead with a proximal 6-cm RA electrode and a distal 6-cm spiral-shaped CS electrode were positioned into the CS with the RA electrode against the anterolateral RA wall. The RA-CS electrogram signal amplitudes were measured and the efficacy of the Solo lead for AF detection and defibrillation was assessed by using an external version of the IAD. RESULTS: The leads were inserted in all patients without complication (mean fluoroscopy time: 13.3+/-6.8 min). The mean RA-CS signal amplitude was 484+/-229 microV during sinus rhythm and 274+/-88 microV during AF (p < 0.05). All patients had satisfactory atrial signal amplitude to allow accurate detection of sinus rhythm. Successful cardioversion was achieved in 16/17 (94%) patients with an atrial defibrillation threshold of 320+/-70 V (5.5+/-2.7 J). Insufficient interelectrode spacing resulted in suboptimal electrode locations, associated with a lower atrial signal amplitude, a higher atrial defibrillation threshold and diaphragmatic stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a simplified lead configuration with optimal interelectrode spacing can be used with an IAD for AF detection and defibrillation.

Effect of butorphanol tartrate on shock-related discomfort during internal atrial defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation, intracardiac atrial defibrillation causes discomfort. An easily applicable, short-acting analgesic and anxiolytic drug would increase acceptability of this new treatment mode. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner, the effect of intranasal butorphanol, an opioid, was evaluated in 47 patients with the use of a step-up internal atrial defibrillation protocol (stage I). On request, additional butorphanol was administered and the step-up protocol continued (stage II). Thereafter, if necessary, patients were intravenously sedated (stage III). After each shock, the McGill Pain Questionnaire was used to obtain a sensory (S), affective (A), evaluative (E), and total (T) pain rating index (PRI) and a visual analogue scale analyzing pain (VAS-P) and fear (VAS-F). For every patient, the slope of each pain or fear parameter against the shock number was calculated and individual slopes were averaged for the placebo and butorphanol group. All patients were cardioverted at a mean threshold of 4.4+/-3.3 J. Comparing both patient groups for stage II, the mean slopes for PRI-T (P=0.0099), PRI-S (P=0.019), and PRI-E (P=0.015) became significantly lower in the butorphanol group than in the placebo group. Comparing patients who received the same shock intensity ending stage I and going to stage II, in those patients randomized to placebo the mean VAS-P (P=0.023), PRI-T (P=0. 029), PRI-S (P=0.030), and PRI-E (P=0.023) became significantly lower after butorphanol administration. CONCLUSIONS: During a step-up internal atrial defibrillation protocol, intranasal butorphanol decreased or stabilized the value of several pain variables and did not affect fear. Of the 3 qualitative components of pain, only the affective component was not influenced by butorphanol. The PRI evaluated pain more accurately than the VAS.

Defibrillation-guided radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation secondary to an atrial focus.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a potential focal source of atrial fibrillation (AF) by unmasking spontaneous early reinitiation of AF after transvenous atrial defibrillation (TADF), and to describe a method of using repeated TADF to map and ablate the focus. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation may develop secondary to a rapidly discharging atrial focus that the atria cannot follow synchronously, with suppression of the focus once AF establishes. Focus mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation may be curative but is limited if the patient is in AF or if the focus is quiescent. Early reinitiation of AF has been observed following defibrillation, which might have a focal mechanism. METHODS: We performed TADF in patients with drug-refractory lone AF using electrodes in the right atrium (RA) and the coronary sinus. When reproducible early reinitiation of AF within 2 min after TADF was observed that exhibited a potential focal mechanism, both mapping and RF ablation were performed to suppress AF reinitiation. Clinical and ambulatory ECG monitoring was used to assess AF recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 44 lone AF patients (40 men, 4 women; 32 persistent, 12 paroxysmal AF) with a mean age of 58+/-13 years underwent TADF. Sixteen patients had early reinitiation of AF after TADF, nine (20%; 5 paroxysmal) exhibited a pattern of focal reinitiation. Earliest atrial activation was mapped to the right superior (n = 4) and the left superior (n = 3) pulmonary vein, just inside the orifice, in the seven patients who underwent further study. At the onset of AF reinitiation, the site of earliest activation was 86+/-38 ms ahead of the RA reference electrogram. The atrial activities from this site were fragmented and exhibited progressive cycle-length shortening with decremental conduction to the rest of the atrium until AF reinitiated. Radiofrequency ablation at the earliest activation site resulted in suppression of AF reinitiation despite pace-inducibility. Improved clinical outcome was observed over 8+/-4 months' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous atrial defibrillation can help to unmask, map, and ablate a potential atrial focus in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. A consistent atrial focus is the cause of early reinitiation of AF in 20% of patients with lone AF, and these patients may benefit from this technique.

Heterogeneous changes in electrophysiologic properties in the paroxysmal and chronically fibrillating human atrium.

INTRODUCTION: The regional changes in atrial electrophysiologic properties related to atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and chronic AF (CAF) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the regional changes in atrial electrophysiology in patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the atrial electrophysiology at different sites (high right atrium, low right atrium [LRA], and distal coronary sinus [DCS]) in 11 patients with CAF, 8 patients with PAF, and 10 controls. Patients with CAF had significantly prolonged interatrial conduction and corrected sinus node recovery time, and shortened atrial effective refractory period (ERP) with loss of rate-related adaptation in the DCS, but had paradoxic prolongation of atrial ERP in the LRA, as compared with patients with PAF and the controls. As a result, the spatial distribution of atrial ERP that was observed in the controls and in patients with PAF was reversed in patients with CAF, without an increase in the dispersion of atrial refractoriness. Patients with PAF showed intermediate changes in atrial conduction times and atrial refractoriness as compared with patients with CAF and controls. CONCLUSION: There was a regional heterogeneity on the changes of atrial electrophysiology in different parts of the atrium, and the "normal" spatial distribution of atrial refractoriness was reversed in patients with CAF. The electrophysiologic changes observed in patients with PAF appear to behave as if in transition from the control state to CAF, suggesting progressive changes in atrial electrophysiologic properties.

Long-term outcome in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion.

Internal cardioversion is safe and effective in restoring sinus rhythm, even in patients with persistent AF of prolonged duration. Up to 40% to 50% of patients with AF lasting >1 year but <3 years could be maintained in sinus rhythm using a class III antiarrhythmic drug after successful internal cardioversion, and amiodarone appears to be more effective than sotalol in this patient population.

Favorable effects of flecainide in transvenous internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of intravenous (IV) flecainide on defibrillation energy requirements in patients treated with low-energy internal atrial cardioversion. BACKGROUND: Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is becoming a more widely accepted therapy for acute episode termination and for implantable atrial defibrillators. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with atrial fibrillation (19 persistent, 5 paroxysmal) underwent elective transvenous cardioversion according to a step-up protocol. After successful conversion in a drug-free state, atrial fibrillation was induced by atrial pacing; IV flecainide (2 mg/kg) was administered and a second threshold was determined. In patients in whom cardioversion in a drug-free state failed notwithstanding a 400- to 550-V shock, a threshold determination was attempted after flecainide. RESULTS: Chronic persistent atrial fibrillation was converted in 13/19 (68%) patients at baseline and in 16/19 (84%) patients after flecainide. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was successfully cardioverted in all the patients. A favorable effect of flecainide was observed either in chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (13 patients) or in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (5 patients) with significant reductions in energy requirements for effective defibrillation (persistent atrial fibrillation: 4.42+/-1.37 to 3.50+/-1.51 J, p < 0.005; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1.68+/-0.29 to 0.84+/-0.26 J, p < 0.01). In 14 patients not requiring sedation, the favorable effects of flecainide on defibrillation threshold resulted in a significant reduction in the scores of shock-induced discomfort (3.71+/-0.83 vs. 4.29+/-0.61, p < 0.005). No ventricular proarrhythmia was observed for any shock. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous flecainide reduces atrial defibrillation threshold in patients treated with low-energy internal atrial cardioversion. This reduction in threshold results in lower shock-induced discomfort. Additionally, flecainide may increase the procedure success rate in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.

Detection of atrial fibrillation during sinus tachycardia induced by exercise in patients with implantable atrial defibrillators.

Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for appropriate operation of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD). However, during episodes of sinus tachycardia, distinction between AF and sinus rhythm (SR) using the "quiet interval" and "baseline crossing" analysis in the detection algorithm of the IAD may be difficult. The efficacy of this AF detection algorithm was tested in five patients implanted with an IAD (METRIX, Model 3000 or 3020, InControl Inc.) during treadmill exercise testing. The IADs were programmed to Monitor Mode with a wake up cycle of 1 minute for AF detection using the device nominal parameters or modified parameters, and to mark rhythms appropriate for shock delivery. A mean peak heart rate of 137 +/- 26 beats/min was reached during maximum exercise, and one patient developed transient AF. Seventy-eight (75 in SR, 3 in AF) and 91 (89 in SR, 2 in AF) runs of AF detection were performed using the nominal and modified parameters, respectively. The IAD detected AF and SR accurately, except for one episode of false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia at the nominal settings, but inappropriate shocks were prevented by minimum RR interval criteria that limited discharge at high heart rate. These results indicate that the AF detection algorithm in the IAD may become more vulnerable to false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia, which were avoided by reprogramming the Quiet Interval and minimum RR interval criteria for AF detection. Exercise testing appeared useful to program optimal settings of the IAD in preparation for daily activities.