Real-time PCR quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA using automated sample preparation and murine cytomegalovirus internal control.

Quantitation of circulating hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for monitoring disease progression and for assessing the response to antiviral therapy. Several commercial and 'in house' assays for HBV DNA quantitation have been described but many of these have limitations of relatively low sensitivity and limited dynamic range. This study describes the development and evaluation of a FRET-based real-time PCR assay designed to overcome these limitations and to provide accurate quantitation of DNA from all eight genotypes of HBV (A-H). The assay employs a fully automated nucleic acid extraction system permitting high-sample throughput with minimal 'hands-on' time and incorporates a murine cytomegalovirus (mCMV) internal control to prevent false negative results and under-reporting due to unrecognised problems with viral lysis, DNA purification or PCR amplification. Sensitivity, assessed by Probit analysis at the 95% detection level, was 24.4 IU/ml, associated with an extremely wide dynamic range (approximately 9 log10). Coefficients of variation were low for both intra-assay and inter-assay variability (CV%, 7-11%) and quantitative data correlated well (R2 = 0.97) with the Digene hybrid capture assay. This assay provides an ideal system for therapeutic monitoring and for studying the relationship between HBV viral load and stage of disease.

Development and evaluation of an internally controlled semiautomated PCR assay for quantification of cell-free cytomegalovirus.

Quantification of circulating human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is useful in clinical contexts such as virological surveillance of bone marrow transplant recipients and monitoring of antiviral therapy. This report describes an internally controlled, quantitative, semiautomated, HCMV genome assay that was developed primarily to measure HCMV DNA in the plasma of severely leucopaenic patients. It exhibits greater sensitivity, wider dynamic range and higher sample throughput than a number of previously described commercial and "in-house" assays. Viral DNA extraction from EDTA plasma samples was automated using a BioRobot 9604 (Qiagen). HCMV strain AD169 was used to prepare a calibration curve and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) strain Smith was added as internal control to all calibration standards and test samples. Amplification was performed using a set of primers based on the HCMV UL50 region, capable of amplifying both human and murine CMV. The yield of biotinylated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products was estimated using HCMV-specific and MCMV-specific enzyme-labelled probes and automated chemiluminescence detection. Log-transformed HCMV-to-MCMV signal ratios were calculated and used for quantification of test samples against simultaneously extracted MCMV-spiked calibration standards. Evaluation of the assay sensitivity by Probit analysis demonstrated a 95% probability of detection at 100 HCMV genomes per ml of plasma; the dynamic range was shown to be > or = 4 log(10). A total of 315 samples from 61 bone marrow transplant patients were analysed by both the quantitative PCR (qPCR) and by a previously validated nested nonquantitative PCR (NQPCR). A high level of concordance (90%) was observed between the two assays, although the qPCR assay exhibited slightly greater sensitivity.

Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

BACKGROUND: Although several diagnostic methods are available for the surveillance of patients at risk of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease, little data is available on their comparative performances in the diagnostic setting. OBJECTIVES: To compare different assays for CMV detection, especially assays based on (quantitative) DNA and mRNA detection. STUDY DESIGN: Eight allogeneic bone marrow and stem cell transplant recipients at high risk for developing CMV disease (donor CMV-negative, recipient positive) were regularly tested for 7-20 weeks post-transplant by spin-amplification rapid culture from urine (viruria), antigenemia (pp65 assay), pp67 mRNA in whole blood (NASBA), and CMV DNA both qualitatively (in-house PCR, whole blood) and quantitatively (in-house PCR, plasma; Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, plasma and whole blood; Hybrid Capture, whole blood). RESULTS: Four patients (50%) suffered CMV reactivation during follow-up. Out of 104 sample dates, 41 (39.4%) yielded a positive CMV result in at least one assay. Out of the 28 samples tested by all assays, the highest percentage of positive results was obtained with the in-house quantitative PCR (60.7%), followed by the Hybrid Capture system (39.3%), the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, plasma version (35.7%), the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, whole blood version (32.1%), in-house qualitative PCR (28.6%), and the mRNA assay (21.4%). Viruria was positive in one sample and pp65 antigenemia was found in two samples. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a considerable incidence of CMV reactivations, pre-emptive anti-CMV chemotherapy prevented the development of CMV disease with the exception of one case. The molecular assays had superior sensitivity to conventional ones. The antigenemia assay proved unsuitable for the surveillance of hematological transplant patients. However, none of the tests recognized all timepoints with CMV reactivation. Further comparative studies are needed to determine their respective diagnostic values.

HIV-1 RNA serum-load and resistant viral genotypes during early zidovudine therapy.

The response of HIV-1 to initial zidovudine (ZDV) treatment was assessed in 11 patients with severe HIV disease. We quantified serum HIV-1 concentrations and mutations associated with ZDV resistance by culture-independent methods. There was a prompt fall in serum HIV-1 RNA within 1-2 days of treatment with maximum suppression by seven days, which was paralleled by changes in serum p24 antigen (p24 Ag). Serum RNA started to return to pretreatment levels within weeks. The HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) gene in most patients developed mutations associated with drug resistance within months and as early as 25 days on therapy in one patient. The codon changes were not sufficient to explain the early return of serum HIV-1 RNA levels and their patterns continued to evolve after patients stopped taking ZDV. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the limited long-term efficacy of ZDV. The dynamic time course of viral load and RT responses to ZDV is of particular importance in short-term interventions such as pregnancy.

Evaluation of commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detection of B19 parvovirus IgM and IgG.

An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Parvoscan-B19; Sweden) was compared with an in-house MACRIA for the detection of B19 specific IgM. A Parvoscan-B19 IgG test was also evaluated for its ability to detect a recent B19 infection in paired sera. Two hundred and twenty sera submitted to the laboratory for B19 serology and four MACRIA positive control sera were assayed for B19 IgM. Confirmation of the response of sera giving discordant results in the two assays was sought by the use of a "nested" polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of B19 DNA. The Parvoscan-B19 IgM test was 79% sensitive and 96% specific. Parvoscan-B19 was poor at detecting parvovirus infection in sera collected two to three months after the onset of symptoms. When sera collected more than seven weeks after the onset of symptoms were excluded from the analysis, Parvoscan-B19 IgM was 84% sensitive and 96% specific. Rubella specific IgM positive sera, rheumatoid factor positive sera, and heterophil antibody positive sera were also assayed for B19 IgM. No false positive results were encountered with these problematic sera. By using the cut off criteria for the Parvoscan-IgM test previously advocated by the manufacturers, 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity could be achieved. False positive results, however, occurred with six of the 17 rubella IgM positive sera, four of the 10 rheumatoid factor positive sera, and two of the 11 heterophil antibody positive sera tested. It is concluded that the Parvoscan-B19 was specific but insensitive when compared with in-house assays.