Processing of LtaS restricts LTA assembly and YSIRK preprotein trafficking into Staphylococcus aureus cross-walls.

Septal membranes of Staphylococcus aureus serve as the site of secretion for precursors endowed with the YSIRK motif. Depletion of ltaS, a gene required for lipoteichoic acid (LTA) synthesis, results in the loss of restricted trafficking of YSIRK precursors to septal membranes. Here, we seek to understand the mechanism that ties LTA assembly and trafficking of YSIRK precursors. We confirm that catalytically inactive lipoteichoic acid synthase (LtaS)T300A does not support YSIRK precursor trafficking to septa. We hypothesize that the enzyme's reactants [gentiobiosyldiacylglycerol (Glc2-DAG) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG)] or products [LTA and diacylglycerol (DAG)], not LtaS, must drive this process. Indeed, we observe that septal secretion of the staphylococcal protein A YSIRK precursor is lost in ypfP and ltaA mutants that produce glycerophosphate polymers [poly(Gro-P)] without the Glc2-DAG lipid anchor. These mutants display longer poly(Gro-P) chains, implying enhanced PG consumption and DAG production. Our experiments also reveal that in the absence of Glc2-DAG, the processing of LtaS to the extracellular catalytic domain, eLtaS, is impaired. Conversely, LTA polymerization is delayed in a strain producing LtaSS218P, a variant processed more slowly than LtaS. We conclude that Glc2-DAG binding to the enzyme couples catalysis by LtaS and the physical release of eLtaS. We propose a model for the temporal and localized assembly of LTA into cross-walls. When LtaS is not processed in a timely manner, eLtaS no longer diffuses upon daughter cell splitting, LTA assembly continues, and the unique septal-lipid pool, PG over DAG ratio, is not established. This results in profound physiological changes in S. aureus cells, including the inability to restrict the secretion of YSIRK precursors at septal membranes.IMPORTANCEIn Staphylococcus aureus, peptidoglycan is assembled at the septum. Dedicated cell division proteins coordinate septal formation and the fission of daughter cells. Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) assembly and trafficking of preproteins with a YSIRK motif also occur at the septum. This begs the question as to whether cell division components also recruit these two pathways. This study shows that the processing of lipoteichoic acid synthase (LtaS) to extracellular LtaS by signal peptidase is regulated by gentiobiosyldiacylglycerol (Glc2-DAG), the priming substrate for LTA assembly. A model is proposed whereby a key substrate controls the temporal and spatial activity of an enzyme. In turn, this mechanism enables the establishment of a unique and transient lipid pool that defines septal membranes as a targeting site for the secretion of YSIRK preproteins.

Small RNAs Activate Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 by Modulating mRNA Stability through the hilD mRNA 3' Untranslated Region.

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is an enteric pathogen associated with foodborne disease. Salmonella invades the intestinal epithelium using a type three secretion system encoded on Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1). SPI-1 genes are tightly regulated by a complex feed-forward loop to ensure proper spatial and temporal expression. Most regulatory input is integrated at HilD, through control of hilD mRNA translation or HilD protein activity. The hilD mRNA possesses a 310-nucleotide 3' untranslated region (UTR) that influences HilD and SPI-1 expression, and this regulation is dependent on Hfq and RNase E, cofactors known to mediate small RNA (sRNA) activities. Thus, we hypothesized that the hilD mRNA 3' UTR is a target for sRNAs. Here, we show that two sRNAs, SdsR and Spot 42, regulate SPI-1 by targeting different regions of the hilD mRNA 3' UTR. Regulatory activities of these sRNAs depended on Hfq and RNase E, in agreement with previous roles found for both at the hilD 3' UTR. Salmonella mutants lacking SdsR and Spot 42 had decreased virulence in a mouse model of infection. Collectively, this work suggests that these sRNAs targeting the hilD mRNA 3' UTR increase hilD mRNA levels by interfering with RNase E-dependent mRNA degradation and that this regulatory effect is required for Salmonella invasiveness. Our work provides novel insights into mechanisms of sRNA regulation at bacterial mRNA 3' UTRs and adds to our knowledge of post-transcriptional regulation of the SPI-1 complex feed-forward loop. IMPORTANCE Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is a prominent foodborne pathogen, infecting millions of people a year. To express virulence genes at the correct time and place in the host, Salmonella uses a complex regulatory network that senses environmental conditions. Known for their role in allowing quick responses to stress and virulence conditions, we investigated the role of small RNAs in facilitating precise expression of virulence genes. We found that the 3' untranslated region of the hilD mRNA, encoding a key virulence regulator, is a target for small RNAs and RNase E. The small RNAs stabilize hilD mRNA to allow proper expression of Salmonella virulence genes in the host.

A Novel Family of RNA-Binding Proteins Regulate Polysaccharide Metabolism in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.

Human gut microbiome composition is constantly changing, and diet is a major driver of these changes. Gut microbial species that persist in mammalian hosts for long periods of time must possess mechanisms for sensing and adapting to nutrient shifts to avoid being outcompeted. Global regulatory mechanisms mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that govern responses to nutrient shifts have been characterized in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes but remain undiscovered in the Bacteroidetes. Here, we report the identification of RBPs that are broadly distributed across the Bacteroidetes, with many genomes encoding multiple copies. Genes encoding these RBPs are highly expressed in many Bacteroides species. A purified RBP, RbpB, from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron binds to single-stranded RNA in vitro with an affinity similar to other characterized regulatory RBPs. B. thetaiotaomicron mutants lacking RBPs show dramatic shifts in expression of polysaccharide utilization and capsular polysaccharide loci, suggesting that these RBPs may act as global regulators of polysaccharide metabolism. A B. thetaiotaomicron ΔrbpB mutant shows a growth defect on dietary sugars belonging to the raffinose family of oligosaccharides (RFOs). The ΔrbpB mutant had reduced expression of BT1871, encoding a predicted RFO-degrading melibiase, compared to the wild-type strain. Mutation of BT1871 confirmed that the enzyme it encodes is essential for growth on melibiose and promotes growth on the RFOs raffinose and stachyose. Our data reveal that RbpB is required for optimal expression of BT1871 and other polysaccharide-related genes, suggesting that we have identified an important new family of global regulatory proteins in the Bacteroidetes. IMPORTANCE The human colon houses hundreds of bacterial species, including many belonging to the genus Bacteroides, that aid in breaking down our food to keep us healthy. Bacteroides have many genes responsible for breaking down different dietary carbohydrates, and complex regulatory mechanisms ensure that specific genes are only expressed when the right carbohydrates are available. In this study, we discovered that Bacteroides use a family of RNA-binding proteins as global regulators to coordinate expression of carbohydrate utilization genes. The ability to turn different carbohydrate utilization genes on and off in response to changing nutrient conditions is critical for Bacteroides to live successfully in the gut, and thus the new regulators we have identified may be important for life in the host.

Dynamic interactions between the RNA chaperone Hfq, small regulatory RNAs, and mRNAs in live bacterial cells.

RNA-binding proteins play myriad roles in regulating RNAs and RNA-mediated functions. In bacteria, the RNA chaperone Hfq is an important post-transcriptional gene regulator. Using live-cell super-resolution imaging, we can distinguish Hfq binding to different sizes of cellular RNAs. We demonstrate that under normal growth conditions, Hfq exhibits widespread mRNA-binding activity, with the distal face of Hfq contributing mostly to the mRNA binding in vivo. In addition, sRNAs can either co-occupy Hfq with the mRNA as a ternary complex, or displace the mRNA from Hfq in a binding face-dependent manner, suggesting mechanisms through which sRNAs rapidly access Hfq to induce sRNA-mediated gene regulation. Finally, our data suggest that binding of Hfq to certain mRNAs through its distal face can recruit RNase E to promote turnover of these mRNAs in a sRNA-independent manner, and such regulatory function of Hfq can be decoyed by sRNA competitors that bind strongly at the distal face.

Messenger RNAs or mRNAs are molecules that the cell uses to transfer the information stored in the cell's DNA so it can be used to make proteins. Bacteria can regulate their levels of mRNA molecules, and they can therefore control how many proteins are being made, by producing a different type of RNA called small regulatory RNAs or sRNAs. Each sRNA can bind to several specific mRNA targets, and lead to their degradation by an enzyme called RNase E. Certain bacterial RNA-binding proteins, such as Hfq, protect sRNAs from being degraded, and help them find their mRNA targets. Hfq is abundant in bacteria. It is critical for bacterial growth under harsh conditions and it is involved in the process through which pathogenic bacteria infect cells. However, it is outnumbered by the many different RNA molecules in the cell, which compete for binding to the protein. It is not clear how Hfq prioritizes the different RNAs, or how binding to Hfq alters RNA regulation. Park, Prévost et al. imaged live bacterial cells to see how Hfq binds to RNA strands of different sizes. The experiments revealed that, when bacteria are growing normally, Hfq is mainly bound to mRNA molecules, and it can recruit RNase E to speed up mRNA degradation without the need for sRNAs. Park, Prévost et al. also showed that sRNAs could bind to Hfq by either replacing the bound mRNA or co-binding alongside it. The sRNA molecules that strongly bind Hfq can compete against mRNA for binding, and thus slow down the degradation of certain mRNAs. Hfq could be a potential drug target for treating bacterial infections. Understanding how it interacts with other molecules in bacteria could provide help in the development of new therapeutics. These findings suggest that a designed RNA that binds strongly to Hfq could disrupt its regulatory roles in bacteria, killing them. This could be a feasible drug design opportunity to counter the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Effects of individual base-pairs on in vivo target search and destruction kinetics of bacterial small RNA.

Base-pairing interactions mediate many intermolecular target recognition events. Even a single base-pair mismatch can cause a substantial difference in activity but how such changes influence the target search kinetics in vivo is unknown. Here, we use high-throughput sequencing and quantitative super-resolution imaging to probe the mutants of bacterial small RNA, SgrS, and their regulation of ptsG mRNA target. Mutations that disrupt binding of a chaperone protein, Hfq, and are distal to the mRNA annealing region still decrease the rate of target association, kon, and increase the dissociation rate, koff, showing that Hfq directly facilitates sRNA-mRNA annealing in vivo. Single base-pair mismatches in the annealing region reduce kon by 24-31% and increase koff by 14-25%, extending the time it takes to find and destroy the target by about a third. The effects of disrupting contiguous base-pairing are much more modest than that expected from thermodynamics, suggesting that Hfq buffers base-pair disruptions.

Translation inhibition from a distance: The small RNA SgrS silences a ribosomal protein S1-dependent enhancer.

Many bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) efficiently inhibit translation of target mRNAs by forming a duplex that sequesters the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence or start codon and prevents formation of the translation initiation complex. There are a growing number of examples of sRNA-mRNA binding interactions distant from the SD region, but how these mediate translational regulation remains unclear. Our previous work in Escherichia coli and Salmonella identified a mechanism of translational repression of manY mRNA by the sRNA SgrS through a binding interaction upstream of the manY SD. Here, we report that SgrS forms a duplex with a uridine-rich translation-enhancing element in the manY 5' untranslated region. Notably, we show that the enhancer is ribosome-dependent and that the small ribosomal subunit protein S1 interacts with the enhancer to promote translation of manY. In collaboration with the chaperone protein Hfq, SgrS interferes with the interaction between the translation enhancer and ribosomal protein S1 to repress translation of manY mRNA. Since bacterial translation is often modulated by enhancer-like elements upstream of the SD, sRNA-mediated enhancer silencing could be a common mode of gene regulation.

Stochastic Analysis Demonstrates the Dual Role of Hfq in Chaperoning E. coli Sugar Shock Response.

Small RNAs (sRNAs) play a crucial role in the regulation of bacterial gene expression by silencing the translation of target mRNAs. SgrS is an sRNA that relieves glucose-phosphate stress, or "sugar shock" in E. coli. The power of single cell measurements is their ability to obtain population level statistics that illustrate cell-to-cell variation. Here, we utilize single molecule super-resolution microscopy in single E. coli cells coupled with stochastic modeling to analyze glucose-phosphate stress regulation by SgrS. We present a kinetic model that captures the combined effects of transcriptional regulation, gene replication and chaperone mediated RNA silencing in the SgrS regulatory network. This more complete kinetic description, simulated stochastically, recapitulates experimentally observed cellular heterogeneity and characterizes the binding of SgrS to the chaperone protein Hfq as a slow process that not only stabilizes SgrS but also may be critical in restructuring the sRNA to facilitate association with its target ptsG mRNA.

Determinants of target prioritization and regulatory hierarchy for the bacterial small RNA SgrS.

Small RNA (sRNA) regulators promote efficient responses to stress, but the mechanisms for prioritizing target mRNA regulation remain poorly understood. This study examines mechanisms underlying hierarchical regulation by the sRNA SgrS, found in enteric bacteria and produced under conditions of metabolic stress. SgrS posttranscriptionally coordinates a nine-gene regulon to restore growth and homeostasis. An in vivo reporter system quantified SgrS-dependent regulation of target genes and established that SgrS exhibits a clear target preference. Regulation of some targets is efficient even at low SgrS levels, whereas higher SgrS concentrations are required to regulate other targets. In vivo and in vitro analyses revealed that RNA structure and the number and position of base pairing sites relative to the start of translation impact the efficiency of regulation of SgrS targets. The RNA chaperone Hfq uses distinct modes of binding to different SgrS mRNA targets, which differentially influences positive and negative regulation. The RNA degradosome plays a larger role in regulation of some SgrS targets compared to others. Collectively, our results suggest that sRNA selection of target mRNAs and regulatory hierarchy are influenced by several molecular features and that the combination of these features precisely tunes the efficiency of regulation of multi-target sRNA regulons.

Translational regulation by bacterial small RNAs via an unusual Hfq-dependent mechanism.

In bacteria, the canonical mechanism of translational repression by small RNAs (sRNAs) involves sRNA-mRNA base pairing that occludes the ribosome binding site (RBS), directly preventing translation. In this mechanism, the sRNA is the direct regulator, while the RNA chaperone Hfq plays a supporting role by stabilizing the sRNA. There are a few examples where the sRNA does not directly interfere with ribosome binding, yet translation of the target mRNA is still inhibited. Mechanistically, this non-canonical regulation by sRNAs is poorly understood. Our previous work demonstrated repression of the mannose transporter manX mRNA by the sRNA SgrS, but the regulatory mechanism was unknown. Here, we report that manX translation is controlled by a molecular role-reversal mechanism where Hfq, not the sRNA, is the direct repressor. Hfq binding adjacent to the manX RBS is required for sRNA-mediated translational repression. Translation of manX is also regulated by another sRNA, DicF, via the same non-canonical Hfq-dependent mechanism. Our results suggest that the sRNAs recruit Hfq to its binding site or stabilize the mRNA-Hfq complex. This work adds to the growing number of examples of diverse mechanisms of translational regulation by sRNAs in bacteria.