Can the use of the radial artery be expanded to all patients with different surgical grafting techniques? Early clinical and angiographic results in 600 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The use of the radial artery (RA) as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is gaining in popularity worldwide and is being increasingly adopted by many cardiac surgeons. Encouraged by our satisfactory early experience with the use of the RA conduit, we have expanded its use to more than 90% of all coronary surgery patients. The aim of the present study was to review our clinical and angiographic results when the use of the RA conduit was expanded to all patients including those aged 65 years and older and diabetics with different surgical grafting techniques. METHODS: The records of 600 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG using the RA graft at Harefield Hospital between January 1999 and August 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety-three (15.5%) patients consented and underwent angiography before discharge at the earliest on the fourth postoperative day, aiming to look at the quality of anastomoses and the patency of the RA grafts. RESULTS: The 600 patients had 613 RA grafts to perform 652 distal RA anastomoses. The proximal ends of 515 (84%) RA grafts were anastomosed to the aorta, 98 (16%) RA grafts were constructed as Y-grafts with 49 (8%) RA off a vein graft hood, and 49 (8%) RA grafts were constructed as T- or Y-grafts off an internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft. The proximal ends of 19 (19/294 or 6.5%) vein grafts were constructed as Y-grafts off the RA grafts. Two hundred and sixty-one (43.5%) patients were above the age of 65 years and 111 (18.5%) patients were diabetics. There were four in-hospital deaths (0.6%) among the study patients. Six (1%) patients developed forearm hematoma/seroma postoperatively. The operation time, the hospital stay, and the incidence of conduit harvest site infection for the patients who had vein grafts in addition to the RA grafts were significantly higher than those of patients who had RA grafts only. On postoperative angiography, 86 out of 93 (92.5%) RA grafts were found to be patent with good quality distal anastomoses. The maximum stenosis of the coronary arteries bypassed by the patent 86 RA grafts was 82.6 +/- 6.2%, while it was 56.3 +/- 15.4% for the coronary arteries bypassed by the occluded seven RA grafts, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The use of the RA can be expanded to all patients with different surgical grafting techniques and provides satisfactory clinical and angiographic outcomes.

Use of radial artery graft reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients aged 65 years and older.

BACKGROUND: The use of the radial artery graft in patients aged 65 years and older could prevent the occurrence of leg wound infection, which is known to increase the morbidity of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: We reviewed, retrospectively, 261 patients aged 65 years and older (age range 65 to 93 years), who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery between February 1998 and August 2001. All the patients received at least one radial artery graft in addition to either a left internal thoracic artery, right internal thoracic artery, or saphenous vein graft as required. Saphenous vein grafts were used in 141 (54.1%) patients (group 1), and these were compared to 120 (45.9%) patients (group 2) who received only arterial conduits. Angiography was performed on 26 consecutive patients. The aim of the study was to review the clinical and angiographic outcomes in this population. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses performed was 2.98. Mean global operating time was 204 minutes. This time dropped to 201 minutes in group 1 versus 231 minutes in group 2; p = 0.009. Sixteen (11.3%) patients receiving saphenous vein grafts had leg wound infection whereas only 1 (0.3%) patient of the global population had a forearm infection. The mean global hospital stay was 9.81 days; this duration increased to 13 days when leg wound infection occurred versus 9.1 days when infection did not occur; p = 0.008. Twenty-six (10%) patients underwent an early angiographic study. Twenty-four (92.3%) radial artery grafts were patent. CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of radial artery grafts in patients aged 65 years and older is feasible, safe, and does not increase mortality, morbidity, or the complexity of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.