Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 293: 113420, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861099

RESUMO

Assessing the factors that influence duration and number of hospitalizations may support mental health services planning and delivery. This study examines the factors associated with length of stay and readmission in Portuguese psychiatric inpatient services during 2002, 2007 and 2012. Data from all admissions were extracted from clinical files. Logistic regression models estimated the association between length of stay (<17 vs ≥17 days) and number of admissions per year (1 vs >1 admission) with sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual factors. Older age, a diagnosis of psychosis, and compulsory admission were associated with higher odds of longer length of stay. Being married, secondary education, suicide attempt, a diagnosis of substance use and "other mental disorders", being admitted in 2012, and two of the psychiatric inpatient services associated with lower odds of longer length of stay. Being retired (or others), a diagnosis of psychosis, compulsory admission, and psychiatric service were associated with increased odds of readmission. Older age, and secondary and higher education were associated with lower odds of readmission. The findings indicate that multiple factors influence length of stay and readmission. Identifying these factors provides useful evidence for clinicians and policy makers to design more targeted and cost-effective interventions.


Assuntos
Hospitais Psiquiátricos/tendências , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Escolaridade , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 28(6): 638-643, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30078385

RESUMO

AIMS: Portugal was one of the European countries most affected by the period of economic recession initiated in 2008. Social inequalities are likely to widen during such periods and disproportionately affect people with mental disorders. The present study aims to compare self-reported changes in indicators of socioeconomic position during the economic recession in Portugal among people with and without mental disorders in the beginning of this period. Three dimensions were assessed, namely employment situation, experiences of financial hardship and subjective social status. METHODS: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative Portugal (2008/2009) and from the National Mental Health Survey Follow-up (2015/2016) were used (n = 911). Multinomial and logistic recession models were performed to examine the association between the presence of any 12-month mood or anxiety mental disorder in 2008/2009 and indicators of socioeconomic position in 2015/2016. All analyses were adjusted for gender, age, presence of any physical disorder and education at the baseline. RESULTS: Participants that had any mental disorder in the beginning of the economic recession reported 2.20 (95% CI 1.31-3.71; P < 0.01) higher odds of financial hardship related to daily life in 2015/2016, when compared with those without any mental disorder, after adjusting for age, gender, education and presence of any physical disorder. The results may also suggest a pattern of increased socioeconomic disadvantage among people with prior mental disorder, despite not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the economic recession may have contributed to wider social inequalities between people with and without mental disorders. Policies to support these individuals, such as access to treatment and alleviation of financial hardship, should be a priority in times of economic downturn.


Assuntos
Recessão Econômica/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Rhinology ; 53(4): 332-9, 2015 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410357

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Spreader grafts are commonly used in rhinoplasty to achieve an aesthetic improvement of the nose or a functional improvement of the nasal airway. Currently, the aesthetic role of spreader grafts is well established. The functional effect of these grafts, however, has been controversial due to the lack of studies clearly demonstrating an increase on nasal airflow assigned to spreader grafts. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of spreader grafts on nasal breathing. METHODS: Nasal breathing of 72 consecutive patients undergoing rhinoplasty was evaluated by measuring peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) before surgery and six months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean preoperative PNIF of the 72 patients included in this study was 79.44 l/min and the mean postoperative PNIF was 110.42 l/min (p < 0.001). In 37 patients of this study no spreader grafts were used. In this group of patients the mean PNIF values changed from 73.24 l/min before surgery to 99.46 l/min after surgery. In the group of 35 patients in whom spreader grafts were used the mean PNIF values changed from 86.00 l/min before surgery to 122.00 l/min after surgery. The increase in the mean PNIF value after rhinoplasty was slightly higher in the group of patients with spreader grafts than in the group of patients without spreader grafts. The difference in the postoperative increase of PNIF between these two groups of patients, however, is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients undergoing rhinoplasty have a statistically significant improvement in nasal breathing after surgery. However, patients receiving spreader grafts in a non-randomized way do not have statistically significant greater benefit than those who do not.


Assuntos
Nariz/fisiologia , Respiração , Rinoplastia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplantes , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...