Rapid diagnostic tests failing to detect infections by Plasmodium falciparum encoding pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in a non-endemic setting.

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) detecting the histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) have a central position for the management of Plasmodium falciparum infections. Yet, variable detection of certain targeted motifs, low parasitaemia, but also deletion of pfhrp2 gene or its homologue pfhrp3, may result in false-negative RDT leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. This study aimed at investigating the prevalence, and understanding the possible causes, of P. falciparum RDT-negative infections at Montpellier Academic Hospital, France. METHODS: The prevalence of falsely-negative RDT results reported before and after the introduction of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, as part as the malaria screening strategy in January 2017, was analysed. Negative P. falciparum RDT infections were screened for pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 deletion; and exons 2 were sequenced to show a putative genetic diversity impairing PfHRP2 detection. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of P. falciparum negative RDTs from January 2006 to December 2018 was low (3/446). Whereas no cases were reported from 2006 to 2016 (0/373), period during which the malaria diagnostic screen was based on microscopy and RDT, prevalence increased up to 4.1% (3/73) between 2017 and 2018, when molecular detection was implemented for primary screening. Neither pfhrp2/3 deletion nor major variation in the frequency of repetitive epitopes could explain these false-negative RDT results. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates the presence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in three P. falciparum RDT-negative infections and reviews the possible reasons for non-detection of HRP2/3 antigens in a non-endemic setting. It highlights the emergence of falsely negative rapid diagnostic tests in a non-endemic setting and draws attention on the risk of missing malaria cases with low parasitaemia infections using the RDT plus microscopy-based strategy currently recommended by French authorities. The relevance of a novel diagnostic scheme based upon a LAMP assay is discussed.

Analytical performances of PENIA and PETIA urinary cystatin C determination allow tubular injury investigation.

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to evaluate the analytical performances of two ERM-DA471/IFCC traceable cystatin C (CysC) reagents available on the market for urinary CysC (u-CysC) quantification. In addition, clinical relevance was assessed by measuring u-CysC in healthy controls and in patients with tubular dysfunction. METHODS: CysC in urine was measured by a particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay using Siemens reagents and by a particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay using DiaSys reagents. Imprecision, linearity, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated according to CLSI recommendations. The two methods were tested on 150 urinary samples from 50 healthy subjects, 50 HIV patients with tubular dysfunction and 50 patients who developed acute kidney acute injury. RESULTS: Within-laboratory coefficients of variations were below 4%. The lower limit of quantification of the assay was found at 0.043 and 0.046 mg/L for DiaSys and Siemens, respectively. The following Passing-Bablok regression equations were obtained: DiaSys = 0.99 Siemens + 0.00. Using Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias was -0.004 mg/L on the analytical range between 0.02 and 1 mg/L. Median u-CysC in 50 HIV patients with tubular dysfunction and in 50 patients with AKI was higher than in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Both Siemens and DiaSys reagents demonstrated reliable and reproducible performances allowing easy determination of u-CysC on automated platforms in clinical practice with potential interest for the detection of tubular dysfunction.