RESUMO
HCV variants were classified into six genotypes (1-6) subdivided into several subtypes with different geographic distribution worldwide. Previous studies conducted in Tunisia showed that genotype 1 counts for more than 80 % of circulating HCV genotypes and most of the isolates belong to subtype 1b. Genotype 2 comes in the second position, however, few sequences have been analyzed and published. In the present study, 89 isolates from Tunisian patients, typed as genotype 2 by the InnoLIPA commercial probe hybridization test, were sequenced in the NS5B and Core/E1 regions. All the isolates, clustered with the genotype 2 reference sequences, in the NS5B and in the Core/E1 region and the phylogenetic analyses in the two genomic regions were perfectly concordant: subtype 2c was the most frequent (58 out of 89, 65.1 %) and few isolates belonged to subtypes 2k(n = 10), 2i(n = 5), and 2b(n = 1). Fifteen isolates did not match with any of the reference sequences representing the genotype 2 subtypes, identified up-to-date. They divided into 2 separate clusters with high bootstrap values in both genomic regions. This study shows perfect concordance between the NS5B and the Core/E1 region suggesting that any of the two regions can be used for genotyping and that intergenotypic and intragenotypic recombinants are not very frequent, at least for HCV isolates from genotype 2. The present study also shows a predominance of subtype 2c among genotype 2 HCV isolates circulating in Tunisia, the co-circulation of minor subtypes (2k, 2i, and 2b) and proposes the possible existence of two other new subtypes.
Assuntos
Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Genes Virais , Hepacivirus/classificação , Funções Verossimilhança , Filogenia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , TunísiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study reports the prevalence and the viral aspects of HBV infection in HCV-positive patients from Tunisia, a country with intermediate and low endemicity for hepatitis B and C, respectively. RESULTS: HBV infection was assessed in the serum samples of 361 HCV-positive patients and compared to a group of HCV negative individuals. Serological markers were determined by ELISA tests and HBV DNA by real-time PCR. HBV serological markers were found in 43% and 44% of patients and controls, respectively. However, the serological and molecular expression of HBV infection differed in the two groups: The group of patients included more individuals with ongoing HBV infection, as defined by the presence of detectable HBsAg and or HBV DNA (17% and 12%, respectively). Furthermore, while most of the controls with ongoing HBV infection expressed HBsAg, the majority of HCV and HBV positive patients were HBsAg negative and HBV DNA positive. Genotyping of HCV isolates showed large predominance of subtype 1b as previously reported in Tunisia. Comparison of the replicative status of the two viruses found low HBV viral load in all co-infected patients as compared to patients with single HBV infection. In contrast, high levels of HCV viremia levels were observed in most of cases with no difference between the group of co-infected patients and the group with single HCV infection. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the knowledge on the prevalence and the virological presentation of HCV/HBV dual infection, providing data from the North African region. It shows that, given the local epidemiology of the two viruses, co-infected patients are likely to have low replication levels of HBV suggesting a suppressive effect of HCV on HBV. In contrast, high replication levels for HCV were fond in most cases which indicate that the presence of circulating HBV-DNA does not necessarily influence HCV replication.
