Spontaneous Lymph Flow Restoration in Free Flaps: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Oncologic excision and trauma can be responsible for major defects and lymphedema. Free flaps are commonly used for reconstruction. We aimed to determine if lymphatic flow between flap and recipient site can be restored without lymphatic surgery. METHODS: 15 free flaps were performed in different patients in our center. Infrared-based lymphography was used to plan surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) was injected in the flap's subdermal tissue and also at the edges of the skin defect. Circumferential lymphatic channels were marked 5 min after the ICG injection. Fluorescent images were recorded with an infrared camera system. The flap inset was obtained by putting side to side the flap markings and the recipient site markings. Infrared-based lymphography was performed on every patient one year after surgery. Spontaneous lymph flow restoration was judged positive if lymphatic connections were observed between the flap and the recipient site. RESULTS: seven free ALT and eight DIEP flaps were performed. All ALT flaps were designed following the limb axis which is the lymphatic axiality. Spontaneous lymph flow restoration was observed for the seven ALT flaps. Eight DIEP flaps were designed upside down and one was designed following the lymph axiality. Spontaneous lymph flow restoration was only observed for the one designed following the lymph axiality. CONCLUSIONS: designing reconstructive free flap regarding lymph axiality seems to improve spontaneous lymph flow restoration between flap and recipient site without any specific lymphatic surgery.

Primary Breast Augmentation with Autologous Fat Grafting Alone: Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using the BREAST-Q.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) for primary aesthetic breast augmentation has grown in popularity over recent years but patient satisfaction has never been objectively evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to use the standardized BREAST-Q questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction in patients who had received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with AFG alone. METHODS: All recipients of primary aesthetic breast augmentation by AFG performed between 2013 and 2017 in our plastic surgery department were included. The primary endpoint was assessment of patient satisfaction with the standardized breast augmentation BREAST-Q questionnaire. Three additional questionnaires were used to evaluate patient and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: In total, 42 patients (84 breasts) underwent breast augmentation by AFG. Mean patient age was 34 years (range, 23-53 years). The mean volume of reinjected fat was 312.2 mL per breast (range, 130-480 mL). We observed significant improvement in all BREAST-Q postoperative items (excluding physical well-being) with a mean increase of 39 points (95% confidence interval: 28.97, 49.03; P < 0.001) regarding patient satisfaction with breasts. Overall, 82% of patients were satisfied with the result of their liposuction. Minor complications were encountered in 6 of our patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast augmentation by AFG enhances patient satisfaction as measured by the BREAST-Q. This procedure has a high satisfaction rate and improves quality of life. Breast augmentation by AFG is a valid surgical option for moderate breast augmentation but is not an alternative to implants in large breast augmentation.Level of Evidence: 4.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: A Satisfactory Noninvasive Procedure for Neck Rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an advanced technology that has been developed in response to the growing demand for noninvasive face rejuvenation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rejuvenation effects, patient satisfaction, and safety of HIFU treatment of the neck in a European population. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 20 patients. The patients were treated with HIFU, and the outcomes were investigated. The modified FACE-Objective Assessment Scale, developed by our team, and the subjective Investigator Global Improvement Assessment Scale (IGIAS; -1 to 3) were used to judge the results of HIFU. Five blinded evaluators scored the procedure outcomes based on photographs taken before and 6 months after the procedure. Side effects were reported and pain was evaluated on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10. RESULTS: Clinical results, such as better definition of the cervicomental angle, were observed in the treated areas. The pretreatment and posttreatment evaluation scores for double chin and skin laxity were evaluated by 4 of 5 evaluators as significantly improved. The IGIAS score was between 1 and 5 in 2 patients, between 6 and 10 in 7 patients, and between 11 and 15 in 11 patients. No patients had a score between -5 and 0. No major complications were reported. The mean pain scores for the D4, M7, and S7 transducer treatments were 5.6 (range, 4.5-6.7), 4.2 (range, 2.5-5.9), and 2.05 (range, 1.05-3.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU may be considered a satisfactory, simple, reproducible, rapid, and safe procedure for neck rejuvenation.Level of Evidence: 4.