A 10-year retrospective cohort study to assess objective and subjective outcomes of combined stapled transanal rectal resection and urogynecological surgery for pelvic floor dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of combined stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) and urogynecological surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse, with a 10-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing prospectively collected data from 53 consecutive patients who underwent combined stapled transanal rectal resection and urogynecological surgery, from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007 at a tertiary referral Pelvic Floor Unit of an Italian hospital. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range (IQR) 67-52t), underwent STARR and concomitant urogynecological surgery. No serious postoperative complications were recorded, and 37/53 women (70%) were evaluated at the 10-year follow-up visit. The cure rate was optimal in 34 women (64.1%). Regarding persistent and/or recurrent symptoms, five sexually-active patients (9%) reported dyspareunia only; obstructed defecation symptoms recurred in ten women (19%); urinary incontinence occurred in eight patients (15%); four patients (11%) reported persistent perineal pain; and two patients (5%) experienced both the urge to defecate and voiding dysfunction. At the 10-year follow-up, 14/27 patients (52%) stated that they would undergo the same operation again, if necessary. Furthermore, the survey found that patients would recommend the combined surgery. CONCLUSION: The 10-year results of this study proved that combined rectal and urogynecological surgery is well tolerated, associated with low morbidity, and more effectively treats a distressing and debilitating condition vs separate surgeries for rectal and pelvic organ prolapse. We recommend complementing the relatively small scale of this study with randomized trials involving a sufficient number of patients, to provide more conclusive evidence on the cumulative long-term effects of combined surgery vs 2- or 3-stage surgery.

Urolastic®, a new bulking agent for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of injections of the new bulking agent Urolastic® in the treatment of patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A systematic search was carried out to select observational and experimental studies on Urolastic® in female patients with SUI. Three different databases, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus, were used to retrieve scientific articles published from their inception to 31 January 2018. RESULTS: Eight full texts were evaluated but only five were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Duration of follow-up after Urolastic® injections was significantly heterogeneous, ranging from 6 to 24 months. Secondary injections were needed in 16.7%-35.0% of the treated patients. The pooled proportion of secondary injections was 20% (95% CI: 15%-24%; I2: 0%). Subjective improvement, measured by different means (i.e., patient global impression of improvement PGI-I score) was only assessed by 40% of the selected papers and was > 80% in two cohorts. The objective treatment success was evaluated by four (80.0%) papers and was achieved in all cohorts with a wide proportional range: from 32.7% (i.e., patients without objective SUI symptom cough tests and with a negative pad test) to 67.0%. Its pooled proportion was 57% (95% CI: 38%-75%; I2: 82.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Urolastic® showed effectiveness in patients with SUI during a follow-up period of 6-24 months.