Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 58(5): 606-612, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29315660

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship, precision, and bias of a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) system during prolonged infusion in neurosurgical patients. We retrospectively included patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective neurosurgical removal of brain tumors and postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit over a period of 3 months. TCI of propofol (Diprifusor - Marsh model) and remifentanil were used for general anesthesia and sedation. We compared propofol blood concentration (Cmeas ) measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy with predicted concentrations (Cpred ) by the TCI system at 40 minutes (T0), 2 hours (T1), and 4 hours (T2) and every 8 hours after starting the drug infusion and at the time of emergence from sedation. Ninety-four paired determinations of Cmeas and Cpred from 15 adult ASA I patients (8 men and 7 women 54.9 ± 13 years old; BMI, 24 ± 3.2 kg/m2 ) were analyzed. Mean duration of drug administration was 31 ± 6 hours. The coefficient of determination (R2 ) of the linear regression model for the relationship of Cmeas and Cpred was 0.43. At the time of emergence, Cmeas was 0.5 ± 0.18 µg/mL. The bias of the TCI system (median performance error) was -34.7%, and the precision (median absolute performance error) was 36%. Wobble and divergence were 0.3% and 12.3%, respectively. This study found bias of the system out of the range of tolerability and showed a high tendency toward overestimation. These findings may lead to undersedation when propofol TCI is used for prolonged infusion.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Drugs ; 68(17): 2427-43, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19016572

RESUMO

Following the initial resuscitation of burn patients, the pain experienced may be divided into a 'background' pain and a 'breakthrough' pain associated with painful procedures. While background pain may be treated with intravenous opioids via continuous infusion or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and/or less potent oral opioids, breakthrough pain may be treated with a variety of interventions. The aim is to reduce patient anxiety, improve analgesia and ensure immobilization when required. Untreated pain and improper sedation may result in psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression or delirium. This review summarizes recent developments and current techniques in sedation and analgesia in non-intubated adult burn patients during painful procedures performed outside the operating room (e.g. staple removal, wound-dressing, bathing). Current techniques of sedation and analgesia include different approaches, from a slight increase in background pain therapy (e.g. morphine PCA) to PCA with rapid-onset opioids, to multimodal drug combinations, nitrous oxide, regional blocks, or non-pharmacological approaches such as hypnosis and virtual reality. The most reliable way to administer drugs is intravenously. Fast-acting opioids can be combined with ketamine, propofol or benzodiazepines. Adjuvant drugs such as clonidine or NSAIDs and paracetamol (acetaminophen) have also been used. Patients receiving ketamine will usually maintain spontaneous breathing. This is an important feature in patients who are continuously turned during wound dressing procedures and where analgo-sedation is often performed by practitioners who are not specialists in anaesthesiology. Drugs are given in small boluses or by patient-controlled sedation, which is titrated to effect, according to sedation and pain scales. Patient-controlled infusion with propofol has also been used. However, we must bear in mind that burn patients often show an altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to drugs as a result of altered haemodynamics, protein binding and/or increased extracellular fluid volume, and possible changes in glomerular filtration. Because sedation and analgesia can range from minimal sedation (anxiolysis) to general anaesthesia, sedative and analgesic agents should always be administered by designated trained practitioners and not by the person performing the procedure. At least one individual who is capable of establishing a patent airway and positive pressure ventilation, as well as someone who can call for additional assistance, should always be present whenever analgo-sedation is administered. Oxygen should be routinely delivered during sedation. Blood pressure and continuous ECG monitoring should be carried out whenever possible, even if a patient is undergoing bathing or other procedures that may limit monitoring of vital pulse-oximetry parameters.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Analgésicos Opioides , Queimaduras , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Dissociativos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletroencefalografia , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...