A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide in healthy Chinese subjects.

AIM: The trial (NCT04016974) investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide, the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes, in healthy Chinese subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled trial randomized 32 healthy Chinese adults to once-daily oral semaglutide (3 mg escalating to 14 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected regularly during treatment and follow-up. The primary endpoint was the area under the semaglutide concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (0-24 h) at steady state (AUC0-24h,sema,SS). Secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints included the maximum observed semaglutide plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,sema,SS). Supportive secondary pharmacodynamics endpoints included changes in body weight and fasting plasma glucose. RESULTS: Treatment with all oral semaglutide doses showed dose-dependent increases in semaglutide exposure in healthy Chinese subjects at steady state, determined by AUC0-24h,sema,SS (233, 552 and 1288 h·nmol/L for 3, 7 and 14 mg of oral semaglutide, respectively) and Cmax,sema,SS. Oral semaglutide treatment was associated with significant reductions in body weight (p = .0001) and fasting plasma glucose (p = .0011) versus placebo at the end of treatment. The safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were consistent with the known profile of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, with no severe or blood-glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic events, serious adverse events or deaths. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSIONS: At steady state, oral semaglutide exposure was dose dependent and close to dose proportionality in healthy Chinese subjects. This is consistent with previous clinical pharmacology results for oral semaglutide.

Effect of Various Dosing Schedules on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Semaglutide: A Randomised Trial in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing information instructs taking oral semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue) in the fasting state, followed by a post-dose fasting period of ≥ 30 min. This trial compared the recommended dosing schedule with alternative schedules. METHODS: This was a randomised, single-centre, multiple-dose, open-label, five-armed, parallel-group trial in healthy subjects who received once-daily oral semaglutide (3 mg for 5 days followed by 7 mg for 5 days). Subjects (n = 156) were randomised to five dosing schedules: 2-, 4-, or 6-h pre-dose fast followed by a 30-min post-dose fast (treatment arms: 2 h-30 min, 4-30 min, 6 h-30 min); 2-h pre-dose fast followed by an overnight post-dose fast (treatment arm: 2 h-night); or overnight pre-dose fast followed by a 30-min post-dose fast (reference arm: night-30 min). Semaglutide plasma concentration was measured regularly until 24 h after the 10th dose. Endpoints included area under the semaglutide plasma concentration-time curve during a 24-h interval after the 10th dose (AUC0-24h) (primary endpoint) and maximum observed semaglutide plasma concentration after the 10th dose (Cmax) (secondary endpoint). RESULTS: Compared with an overnight pre-dose fast (reference arm: night-30 min), shorter pre-dose fasting times in the 2 h-night, 2 h-30 min, 4 h-30 min, and 6 h-30 min treatment arms resulted in significantly lower semaglutide AUC0-24h and Cmax after the 10th dose (estimated treatment ratio ranges: 0.12-0.43 and 0.11-0.44, respectively; p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Semaglutide AUC0-24h and Cmax after the 10th dose were similar for the 2 h-30 min and 2 h-night treatment arms. CONCLUSION: This trial supports dosing oral semaglutide in accordance with prescribing information, which requires dosing in the fasting state. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04513704); registered August 14, 2020.

Oral semaglutide is a human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue that has been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It has been established that taking oral semaglutide with food or large volumes of water decreases absorption of the drug in the body. Current prescribing information instructs taking oral semaglutide on an empty stomach (known as the fasting state), with 120 mL/4 oz of water, then waiting for at least 30 min before consuming any food, water, or taking other oral medications. This study investigates whether different dosing schedules for oral semaglutide could potentially offer more flexibility to patients in the timing of their oral semaglutide dosing. The trial, conducted in healthy volunteers, compares the dosing schedule described in the prescribing information with different fasting times before (pre-dose) and after (post-dose) taking oral semaglutide during the day or evening, to see if there were any effects on the concentration of drug in the body. Compared to the recommended overnight fasting period, shorter pre-dose fasting periods of 2­6 h with a 30-min post-dose fast considerably reduced semaglutide exposure in the body. Similarly, semaglutide exposure was also reduced with a 2-h pre-dose fast combined with post-dose overnight fasting. These findings further support the current prescribing information, which states that patients should take their oral semaglutide dose after an overnight fast.

Effect of oral semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of thyroxine after dosing of levothyroxine and the influence of co-administered tablets on the pharmacokinetics of oral semaglutide in healthy subjects: an open-label, one-sequence crossover, single-center, multiple-dose, two-part trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral semaglutide comprises the glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, semaglutide, and sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). Levothyroxine has similar dosing conditions to oral semaglutide. This trial investigated if oral semaglutide co-administered with levothyroxine affects thyroxine (T4) exposure and if multiple placebo tablets co-administered with oral semaglutide affect semaglutide exposure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this one-sequence crossover trial, 45 healthy subjects received levothyroxine (600 µg single-dose) alone, or with concomitant SNAC 300 mg or concomitant oral semaglutide 14 mg at steady-state. Subjects also received oral semaglutide 14 mg at steady-state alone or with five placebo tablets once-daily for 5 weeks. RESULTS: A 33% increase in total T4 exposure was observed with levothyroxine/oral semaglutide vs levothyroxine alone, but baseline-corrected maximum concentration (Cmax) was unaffected. SNAC alone did not affect total T4 exposure, whereas Cmax was slightly decreased. A 34% decrease in semaglutide exposure was observed when oral semaglutide was co-administered with placebo tablets, and Cmax also decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Levothyroxine pharmacokinetics were influenced by co-administration with oral semaglutide. Monitoring of thyroid parameters should be considered when treating patients with both oral semaglutide and levothyroxine. Oral semaglutide exposure was influenced by co-administration with multiple tablets, which is addressed in the dosing guidance.

Absence of QTc Prolongation with Sodium N-(8-[2-Hydroxybenzoyl] Amino) Caprylate (SNAC), an Absorption Enhancer Co-Formulated with the GLP-1 Analogue Semaglutide for Oral Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Oral delivery of proteins, including glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, is impeded by low gastrointestinal permeation. Oral semaglutide has been developed for once-daily oral administration by co-formulation of the GLP-1 analogue semaglutide with an absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC, 300 mg). A randomised, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled thorough QT/corrected QT (QTc) trial was conducted to confirm the absence of unacceptable QTc interval prolongation with SNAC. QT is defined as interval on the electrocardiogram, measured from the start of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave. METHODS: Part A of the study sought to identify an appropriate dose of SNAC (which was substantially higher than that used in the oral semaglutide co-formulation) for QTc assessment. Three sequential healthy volunteer cohorts were randomised to escalating single oral doses of SNAC (1.2, 2.4 or 3.6 g) or placebo. Following identification of an appropriate dose, a cross-over trial was conducted (Part B). Healthy volunteers received one of four treatment sequences, including single oral doses of SNAC, moxifloxacin (positive control) and placebo. Primary objectives were to (1) assess adverse events (AEs) with escalating SNAC doses and (2) confirm that SNAC does not cause unacceptable QTc interval prolongation versus placebo, using the Fridericia heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcF). RESULTS: All subjects completed Part A (N = 36) and 46 subjects completed Part B. In Part A, all AEs were mild to moderate in severity; no relationship was identified between AE incidence and SNAC dose. SNAC 3.6 g, the maximum investigated SNAC dose, was selected for Part B. There was no unacceptable prolongation of the QTcF interval with SNAC 3.6 g, and assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin as the positive control. There was no significant exposure-response relationship between SNAC concentration and QTcF interval, and no instances of QTc interval > 450 ms or increases > 30 ms. CONCLUSION: This QT/QTc trial demonstrates that SNAC doses 12-fold higher than the 300 mg dose used in the oral formulation of semaglutide do not cause unacceptable prolongation of the QTcF interval. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02911870.

Medications that are taken orally can be broken down by acid in the stomach before they are absorbed and therefore be less effective. Oral semaglutide is a novel type 2 diabetes medication that is formulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC), which helps to protect against semaglutide degradation in the stomach. Regulatory authority guidelines recommend that new therapies should be tested for prolongation of the QT interval, an important part of the heart's electrical cycle. A previous trial demonstrated that semaglutide alone, which is currently available as an injectable diabetes therapy, did not prolong the QT interval when given in doses higher than those used in patients. Therefore, the current trial was conducted to assess whether the SNAC component of oral semaglutide has any relevant prolonging effect on the QT interval. Following regulatory guidelines for trials evaluating prolongation of the QT interval, the first part of the trial aimed to find a suitably high dose of SNAC. The second part of the trial aimed to confirm that SNAC does not prolong the QT interval. The results of this trial demonstrated that a 3.6 g dose of SNAC, which is 12-fold higher than the amount contained in oral semaglutide, does not prolong the QT interval. The safety and tolerability of SNAC 1.2 g, 2.4 g and 3.6 g were assessed in this trial and no concerns were identified. These results, taken alongside those of the previous QT interval study with subcutaneous semaglutide, indicate no relevant effect of oral semaglutide on the QT interval.

Effect of Various Dosing Conditions on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Semaglutide, a Human Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analogue in a Tablet Formulation.

INTRODUCTION: Oral semaglutide is a novel tablet formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide. In two trials, the effects of prior food ingestion (food effect), post-dose fasting period and water volume with dosing (dosing conditions) on oral semaglutide pharmacokinetics were investigated. METHODS: Subjects received once-daily oral semaglutide for 10 days. In the food-effect trial, 78 healthy subjects were randomised 1:1:1 to fed (meal 30 min pre-dose; 240 mL water with dosing), fasting (overnight until 4 h post-dose; 240 mL) or reference (fasting overnight until 30 min post-dose; 120 mL) arms. In the dosing conditions trial, 161 healthy men were randomised into eight dosing groups (overnight fasted with 50/120 mL water and 15/30/60/120 min post-dose fasting). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured frequently until 504 h after the 10th dose. RESULTS: In the food-effect trial, limited or no measurable semaglutide exposure was observed in the fed arm, while all subjects in the fasting arm had measurable semaglutide exposure. Area under the semaglutide concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h,semaglutide,day10) and maximum semaglutide concentration (Cmax,semaglutide,day10) were numerically greater by approximately 40% for the fasting versus reference arm (p = 0.082 and p = 0.080, respectively). In the dosing conditions trial, AUC0-24h,semaglutide,day10 and Cmax,semaglutide,day10 were not different between water volumes (p = 0.541 and p = 0.676), but increased with longer post-dose fasting (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of oral semaglutide in the fasting state with up to 120 mL water and at least 30 min post-dose fasting results in clinically relevant semaglutide exposure. These dosing conditions have been used in the oral semaglutide phase 3 trials and are part of the approved label. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02172313, NCT01572753.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oral Semaglutide: Analyses of Data from Clinical Pharmacology Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The absorption, distribution and elimination of oral semaglutide, the first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for treating type 2 diabetes, was investigated using a population pharmacokinetic model based on data from clinical pharmacology trials. METHODS: A previously developed, two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, based on subcutaneous and intravenous semaglutide, was extended to include data from six oral semaglutide trials conducted in either healthy volunteers or subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. Five trials employed multiple doses of oral semaglutide (5-10 mg) and one was a single-dose (10 mg) trial. In a separate analysis, the model was re-estimated using data from a trial in subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: The model accurately described concentration profiles across trials. Post-dose fasting time, co-ingestion of a large water volume, and body weight were the most important covariates affecting semaglutide exposure. Bioavailability was 0.8% when oral semaglutide was dosed using the recommended dosing conditions (30 min post-dose fasting time, administered with ≤ 120 mL of water), increasing with a longer post-dose fasting time and decreasing with higher water volume. Within-subject variability in bioavailability was 137%, which with once-daily dosing and a long half-life translates into 33% within-subject variability in steady-state exposure. There was no significant difference in oral bioavailability of semaglutide in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The updated model provided a general characterisation of semaglutide pharmacokinetics following oral, subcutaneous and intravenous administration in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. Within-individual variation of oral bioavailability was relatively high, but reduced considerably at steady state. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT01572753, NCT01619345, NCT02014259, NCT02016911, NCT02249871, NCT02172313, NCT02877355.

Relationship Between Oral Semaglutide Tablet Erosion and Pharmacokinetics: A Pharmacoscintigraphic Study.

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue, has been coformulated in a tablet with the absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). We investigated tablet erosion and the pharmacokinetics of oral semaglutide administered with 2 different water volumes and evaluated the relationships between these parameters. In a randomized, single-center (Quotient Sciences, UK), open-label, 2-period crossover trial, 26 healthy men received single doses of 10 mg oral semaglutide with 50 or 240 mL water while fasting. Tablet erosion and gastrointestinal transit were assessed by gamma scintigraphy. Semaglutide and SNAC plasma concentrations were measured until 24 and 6 hours, respectively, after administration. Complete tablet erosion (CTE) occurred in the stomach irrespective of water volume administered with the tablet (primary end point). Mean time to CTE was 85 versus 57 minutes with 50 versus 240 mL water (ratio 50/240 mL, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.37; P = .072). Area under the semaglutide concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24h,semaglutide ) and maximum semaglutide concentration (Cmax,semaglutide ) were ∼70% higher with 50 versus 240 mL water (P = .056 and P = .048, respectively). Median time to maximum semaglutide concentration (tmax,semaglutide ) was 1.5 hours independent of water volume with dosing. Higher AUC0-24h,semaglutide and Cmax,semaglutide and longer tmax,semaglutide were significantly correlated with longer time to CTE and later gastric emptying of tablet and water (all P < .05). The safety profile was as expected for the GLP-1 receptor agonist drug class. In conclusion, the oral semaglutide tablet erodes in the stomach irrespective of water volume with dosing. Slower tablet erosion in the stomach results in higher semaglutide plasma exposure.

Effect of Oral Semaglutide on the Pharmacokinetics of Levonorgestrel and Ethinylestradiol in Healthy Postmenopausal Women and Furosemide and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: The first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) comprises semaglutide co-formulated with the absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). Oral semaglutide may alter the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs via effects of semaglutide or SNAC. Two separate one-sequence crossover trials investigated the effects of oral semaglutide and SNAC on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel, furosemide and rosuvastatin. METHODS: Healthy, postmenopausal women (n = 25) received once-daily combined ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (Trial 1) and healthy male and female subjects (n = 41) received single doses of furosemide and rosuvastatin (Trial 2), either alone, with SNAC alone or with oral semaglutide. Lack of drug-drug interaction was concluded if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) or maximum concentration (Cmax), with/without oral semaglutide, were within a pre-specified interval (0.80-1.25). RESULTS: The AUC values of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were not affected by oral semaglutide co-administration (estimated ratios [90% CI] 1.06 [1.01-1.10] and 1.06 [0.97-1.17], respectively); Cmax was not affected. The no-effect criterion was not met for furosemide or rosuvastatin for the AUC (1.28 [1.16-1.42] and 1.41 [1.24-1.60], respectively) or Cmax. SNAC alone did not affect the AUC or Cmax of ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel or rosuvastatin; the Cmax of furosemide was slightly decreased. Adverse events were similar to those previously observed for GLP-1RAs (both trials). CONCLUSION: Co-administration with oral semaglutide did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol or levonorgestrel. There was a small increase in exposure of furosemide and rosuvastatin; however, these increases are not expected to be of clinical relevance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02845219 and NCT03010475.

Oral semaglutide improves postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delays gastric emptying, in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To assess the effects of oral semaglutide on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and gastric emptying, in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, single-centre, crossover trial, subjects with T2D received once-daily oral semaglutide (escalated to 14 mg) followed by placebo, or vice versa, over two consecutive 12-week periods. Glucose and lipid metabolism, and gastric emptying (paracetamol absorption) were assessed before and after two types of standardized meals (standard and/or fat-rich) at the end of each treatment period. The primary endpoint was area under the glucose 0-5-h curve (AUC0-5h ) after the standard breakfast. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects were enrolled (mean age 58.2 years, HbA1c 6.9%, body weight 93.9 kg, diabetes duration 3.1 years; 13 [86.7%] males). Fasting concentrations of glucose were significantly lower, and C-peptide significantly greater, with oral semaglutide versus placebo. Postprandial glucose (AUC0-5h ) was significantly lower with oral semaglutide versus placebo (estimated treatment ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63, 0.81; p < .0001); glucose incremental AUC (iAUC0-5h/5h ) and glucagon AUC0-5h were also significantly reduced, with similar results after the fat-rich breakfast. Fasting concentrations of triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and apolipoprotein B48 (ApoB48) were significantly lower with oral semaglutide versus placebo. AUC0-8h for triglycerides, VLDL and ApoB48, and triglycerides iAUC0-8h/8h , were significantly reduced after oral semaglutide versus placebo. During the first postprandial hour, gastric emptying was delayed (a 31% decrease in paracetamol AUC0-1h ) with oral semaglutide versus placebo. One serious adverse event (acute myocardial infarction) occurred during oral semaglutide treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral semaglutide significantly improved fasting and postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delayed gastric emptying.

Effect of Oral Semaglutide on the Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril, Warfarin, Digoxin, and Metformin in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Oral semaglutide is a tablet co-formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog semaglutide with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). The absorption of coadministered oral drugs may be altered due to enhancement by SNAC, potential gastric emptying delay by semaglutide, or other mechanisms. Two one-sequence crossover trials investigated the effect of oral semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, and metformin. METHODS: In trial 1, 52 healthy subjects received lisinopril (20 mg single dose) or warfarin (25 mg single dose) with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone (300 mg single dose), followed by oral semaglutide 20 mg once daily (steady state). In trial 2, 32 healthy subjects received digoxin (500 µg single dose) or metformin (850 mg twice daily for 4 days), with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone followed by oral semaglutide, as in trial 1. RESULTS: There were no apparent effects of oral semaglutide on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for lisinopril, warfarin, and digoxin. The AUC of metformin was increased by 32% (90% confidence interval 1.23-1.43) by oral semaglutide coadministration versus metformin alone, whereas the Cmax was unaffected. SNAC alone did not affect exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, or metformin. Adverse events were in line with those previously observed for GLP-1 receptor agonists. CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide or SNAC alone did not appear to affect the exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, or digoxin, and, based on its wide therapeutic index, the higher metformin exposure with oral semaglutide was not considered clinically relevant.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of the Novel Oral Human GLP-1 Analogue, Oral Semaglutide, in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Oral semaglutide is a novel tablet containing the human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP­1) analogue semaglutide, co-formulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). The safety and pharmacokinetics of oral semaglutide were investigated in two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. METHODS: In a single-dose, first-in-human trial, 135 healthy males received oral semaglutide (2-20 mg semaglutide co-formulated with 150-600 mg SNAC) or placebo with SNAC. In a 10-week, once-daily, multiple-dose trial, 84 healthy males received 20 or 40 mg oral semaglutide (with 300 mg SNAC), placebo, or placebo with SNAC, and 23 males with type 2 diabetes (T2D) received 40 mg oral semaglutide (with 300 mg SNAC), placebo, or placebo with SNAC. RESULTS: Oral semaglutide was safe and well-tolerated in both trials. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild, with the most common AEs being gastrointestinal disorders. In the single-dose trial, semaglutide exposure was highest when co-formulated with 300 mg SNAC. In the multiple-dose trial, semaglutide exposure was approximately twofold higher with 40 versus 20 mg oral semaglutide in healthy males, in accordance with dose proportionality, and was similar between healthy males and males with T2D. The half-life of semaglutide was approximately 1 week in all groups. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of oral semaglutide was as expected for the GLP-1 receptor agonist drug class. Oral semaglutide co-formulated with 300 mg SNAC was chosen for further clinical development. The pharmacokinetic results supported that oral semaglutide is suitable for once-daily dosing. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT01037582, NCT01686945.

Transcellular stomach absorption of a derivatized glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

Oral administration of therapeutic peptides is hindered by poor absorption across the gastrointestinal barrier and extensive degradation by proteolytic enzymes. Here, we investigated the absorption of orally delivered semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, coformulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) aminocaprylate] (SNAC) in a tablet. In contrast to intestinal absorption usually seen with small molecules, clinical and preclinical dog studies revealed that absorption of semaglutide takes place in the stomach, is confined to an area in close proximity to the tablet surface, and requires coformulation with SNAC. SNAC protects against enzymatic degradation via local buffering actions and only transiently enhances absorption. The mechanism of absorption is shown to be compound specific, transcellular, and without any evidence of effect on tight junctions. These data have implications for understanding how highly efficacious and specific therapeutic peptides could be transformed from injectable to tablet-based oral therapies.

A randomized study investigating the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral semaglutide.

BACKGROUND: Since the first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 analog comprises semaglutide co-formulated with an absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate, which induces a transient, localized increase in gastric pH, we have investigated whether a proton pump inhibitor affects the pharmacokinetics of oral semaglutide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial investigated pharmacokinetic interactions of oral semaglutide with omeprazole (40 mg once-daily) in 54 healthy subjects. Primary endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h for semaglutide (AUC0-24h,semaglutide,Day10) and maximum concentration of semaglutide (Cmax,semaglutide,Day10) at day 10. RESULTS: Exposure of semaglutide appeared to be slightly increased, although not statistically significantly, with oral semaglutide plus omeprazole versus oral semaglutide alone (AUC0-24h,semaglutide,Day10 [estimated treatment ratio 1.13; 90%CI 0.88, 1.45] and Cmax,semaglutide,Day10 [estimated treatment ratio 1.16; 90%CI 0.90, 1.49]). Gastric pH was higher with oral semaglutide and omeprazole versus oral semaglutide alone. Adverse events were mild or moderate and, most commonly, gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSIONS: There was a slight non-statistically significant increase in semaglutide exposure when oral semaglutide was administered with omeprazole, but this is not considered clinically relevant and no dose adjustment is likely to be required.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Semaglutide in Subjects With Hepatic Impairment.

Semaglutide is a human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog that has been co-formulated with the absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate, for oral administration. This trial (NCT02016911) investigated whether hepatic impairment affects the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral semaglutide. Subjects were classified into groups: normal hepatic function (n = 24), and mild (n = 12), moderate (n = 12), or severe (n = 8) hepatic impairment according to Child-Pugh criteria, and received once-daily oral semaglutide (5 mg for 5 days followed by 10 mg for 5 days). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured during dosing and for up to 21 days post-last dose. Area under the semaglutide plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours after the 10th dose (primary end point) and maximum semaglutide concentration after the 10th dose appeared similar across hepatic function groups. Similarly, there was no apparent effect of hepatic impairment on time to maximum semaglutide concentration (median range 1.0-1.5 hours) or half-life (geometric mean range 142-156 hours). No safety concerns were identified in subjects with hepatic impairment receiving semaglutide. Reported adverse events were in line with those observed for other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. There was no apparent effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral semaglutide. The results of this trial suggest that dose adjustment of oral semaglutide is not warranted in subjects with hepatic impairment.