Anxiety, depressive, or cognitive disorders in rehabilitation patients: effect on length of stay.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that anxiety, depressive, or cognitive disorders are associated with an increase in length of stay of physical rehabilitation inpatients. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a 1-yr prospective data recording. Three treatment and rehabilitation centers in the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland). Ninety-five percent of inpatients admitted from November 15, 1990, to November 14, 1991, agreed to participate. Apart from length of stay, data consisted of demographic and medical data results from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mini-Mental State Score, and Functional Autonomy Measurement System. Multivariate linear regression was used in the analysis. RESULTS: The presence of anxiety or depression altered length of stay in a bivariate analysis, although all effects disappeared in a multivariate approach. Factors that had an independent association with length of stay were gender, length of stay in an acute care hospital before hospitalization, treatment and rehabilitative centers, Functional Autonomy Measurement System mobility score, and Functional Autonomy Measurement System Activities of Daily Living score. Results concerning the association between cognition abilities and length were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our results recognize that an influence of psychiatric disorders acted on length of stay through a relationship between the psychiatric status and the control variables. If mental state influences physical state, then early intervention studies are desirable. If somatic state induces mental alterations, then interventions directed toward the psychiatric sphere will bring mostly qualitative benefits (amelioration of well-being without remarkable effects on length of stay).

Functional status of elderly home care users: do subjects, informal and professional caregivers agree?

Professional or informal proxy respondents are frequently used in surveys when physical or mental health may compromise the ability to participate or the quality of responses. Functional status (Katz activities of daily living [ADL], Lawton instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]) was assessed in a sample of 420 chronically dependent elderly receiving home care. Separate in-person interviews were conducted with subjects, main informal caregivers and professionals coordinating home care. We found substantial agreement (Kappa) particularly between subjects and informal caregivers in all ADL except continence and in all IADL except housekeeping. High levels of agreement were also found for cognitively impaired subjects (Mini-Mental State Examination <24). Disagreement was characterized by more frequent reports of dependence from informal and professional caregivers. Our data suggest that proxy responses by informal caregivers conform with answers provided by subjects but produce slightly higher estimates of dependence and that cognitively impaired elderly living in the community will provide accurate information on their functional status in most cases.

Effectiveness of preventive in-home geriatric assessment in well functioning, community-dwelling older people: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preventive in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prevents functional decline in community-dwelling older persons with different baseline functional status: (1) without any basic activities of daily living (BADL) dependency at baseline; and (2) without any instrumental ADL (IADL) and basic ADL dependency at baseline. DESIGN: Subgroup analyses of a 3-year randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The city of Santa Monica, California. PARTICIPANTS: Participants came from the original population (n = 414) of community-living older persons aged 75 years and older who participated in a trial testing the effectiveness of annual preventive in-home CGA. For the first subgroup analysis, we excluded subjects (n = 27) who were dependent in one or more BADL before randomization (final sample size, n = 387); for the second subgroup analysis, we excluded 93 additional subjects who were dependent in one or more IADL before randomization (final sample size, n = 294). INTERVENTION: Annual preventive in-home CGA, with quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners, for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: Functional status data were collected through yearly in-home interviews by independent observers. Subjects were classified as (1) independent in both BADL and IADL, (2) dependent in IADL but independent in BADL, or (3) dependent in both IADL and BADL. RESULTS: In both subgroup analyses, there was no difference in survival between intervention and control subjects. In the subgroup with no BADL impairment at baseline, intervention subjects spent significantly fewer days dependent in both BADL and IADL during each year of the study (5 days vs 14 days, P = .022; 13 vs 33, P = .016; and 19 vs 44, P = .014 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and over all 3 years combined (36 days vs 92 days, P = .016) in bivariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, the intervention reduced time spent in complete (BADL and IADL) dependency (P = .028). In the subgroup of subjects without any IADL or BADL impairment at baseline, no significant differences were apparent in the number of days spent in complete independence and days spent in complete dependency. Intervention group subjects spent more days in partial dependency during Year 1 (24 days vs 9 days, P = .021), but the difference was not significant during Year 2 (47 vs 29, P = .088), Year 3 (49 vs 41, P = .370), and over all 3 years combined (120 vs 79, P = .123) as well as in multivariate analysis (P = .062). CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that in-home preventive visits delay the onset of disability in people without initial BADL impairment. Further studies in larger samples are needed to determine optimal intervention strategies and effectiveness among well functioning older people.