Associations between left bundle branch block with different PR intervals, QRS durations, heart rates and the risk of heart failure: a register-based cohort study using ECG data from the primary care setting.

AIM: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF). We assessed the impact of common ECG parameters on this association using large-scale data. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using ECGs recorded in a large primary care population from 2001 to 2011, we identified HF-naive patients with a first-time LBBB ECG. We obtained information on sex, age, emigration, medication, diseases and death from Danish registries. We investigated the association between the PR interval, QRS duration, and heart rate and the risk of HF over a 2-year follow-up period using Cox regression analysis.Of 2471 included patients with LBBB, 464 (18.8%) developed HF during follow-up. A significant interaction was found between QRS duration and heart rate (p<0.01), and the analyses were stratified on these parameters. Using a QRS duration <150 ms and a heart rate <70 beats per minute (bpm) as the reference, all groups were statistically significantly associated with the development of HF. Patients with a QRS duration ≥150 ms and heart rate ≥70 bpm had the highest risk of developing HF (HR 3.17 (95% CI 2.41 to 4.18, p<0.001). There was no association between the PR interval and HF after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Prolonged QRS duration and higher heart rate were associated with increased risk of HF among primary care patients with LBBB, while no association was observed with PR interval. Patients with LBBB with both a prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms) and higher heart rate (≥70 bpm) have the highest risk of developing HF.

Association between T-wave discordance and the development of heart failure in left bundle branch block patients: Results from the Copenhagen ECG study.

BACKGROUND: In left bundle branch block (LBBB), discrepancies between depolarization and repolarization of the heart can be assessed by similar direction (concordant) or opposite direction (discordant) of the lateral T-waves compared to the direction of the QRS complex and by the QRS-T angle. We examined the association between discordant T-waves and high QRS-T angles for heart failure development in primary care LBBB patients. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2011, we identified 2540 patients from primary care with LBBB without overt heart failure. We examined the development of heart failure in relation to two ECG measures: (1) LBBB as either discordant (two or three monophasic T-waves in the opposite direction of the QRS complex in leads I, V5 or V6) or concordant, and (2) the frontal plane QRS-T angle in quartile groups. RESULTS: In total, 244 of 913 patients (26.7%) with discordant LBBB developed heart failure compared to 302 of 1627 patients (16.7%) with concordant LBBB. Multivariable Cox regression comparing discordant with concordant LBBB showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.58 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.71-3.89) for heart failure development within 30 days of follow-up and a HR of 1.45 (95%CI 1.19-1.77) after 30 days. For QRS-T angle, comparing the highest quartile (160°-180°) with the lowest quartile (0°-110°) we found a HR of 2.25 (95%CI 1.26-4.02) within 30 days and a HR of 1.67 (95%CI 1.25-2.23) after 30 days. CONCLUSION: T-wave discordance in lateral ECG leads and a high QRS-T angle are associated with heart failure development in primary care LBBB patients.