Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 186(4): 324-9, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14553843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemical staining on breast sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is controversial. METHODS: Twenty-five SLN cases were reviewed by 10 pathologists (three academic, seven private) including 5 negative by both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry, 11 micrometastases (<2 mm) negative by H&E but positive by immunohistochemistry, and 8 micrometastases and 1 macrometastasis (>2 mm) positive for both H&E and immunohistochemistry. Answers included "positive," "negative," and "indeterminate" for each slide. RESULTS: The mean number of incorrect responses was 6.6 for immunohistochemistry and 5 for H&E. Twelve percent of cases were correct by all 10 pathologists; 80% of positive IHC cases had at least one pathologist score it incorrectly. As tumor cells decrease in number, incorrect responses increase. When tumor cells numbered less than 10, more than 30% of pathologists answered incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: As tumor cells decrease in number pathologists' ability to recognize them decreases. We propose adding "indeterminate" to "positive" and "negative" when tumor cells number less than 10.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Corantes , Erros de Diagnóstico , Amarelo de Eosina-(YS) , Feminino , Hematoxilina , Histocitoquímica , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Patologia Clínica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...